Skip to main content
Log in

On the numerical implementation of a shear modified GTN damage model and its application to small punch test

  • Original Research
  • Published:
International Journal of Material Forming Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Gurson-type models have been widely used to predict failure during sheet metal forming process. However, a significant limitation of the original GTN model is that it is unable to capture fracture under relatively low stress triaxiality. This paper focused on the fracture prediction under this circumstance, which means shear-dominated stress state. Recently, a phenomenological modification to the Gurson model that incorporates damage accumulation under shearing has been proposed by Nahshon and Hutchinson. We further calibrated new parameters based on this model in 22MnB5 tensile process and developed the corresponding numerical implementation method. Lower stress triaxiality were realized by new-designed specimens. Subsequently, the related shear parameters were calibrated by means of reverse finite element method and the influences of new introduced parameters were also discussed. Finally, this shear modified model was utilized to model the small punch test (SPT) on 22MnB5 high strength steel. It is shown that the shear modification of GTN model is able to predict failure of sheet metal forming under wide range of stress state.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bao YB, Wierzbicki T (2004) A comparative study on various ductile crack formation criteria. J Eng Mater-T Asme 126:314–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bonora N, Gentile D, Pirondi A, Newaz G (2005) Ductile damage evolution under triaxial state of stress: theory and experiments. Int J Plasticity 21:981–1007

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Jiang W, Li Y, Su J (2016) Modified GTN model for a broad range of stress states and application to ductile fracture. Eur J Mech A Solids 57:132–148

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Nahshon K, Hutchinson JW (2008) Modification of the Gurson model for shear failure. Eur J Mech A-Solid 27:1–17

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Gurson AL (1977) Continuum theory of ductile rupture by void nucleation and growth: part I—yield criteria and flow rules for porous ductile media. J Eng Mater Technol 99:2–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Rice RJ, Tracey D (1969) On the ductile fracture by the growth of holes. J Mech Phys Solids 17:201–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tvergaard V (1981) Influence of voids on shear band instabilities under plane-strain conditions. Int J Fract 17:389–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Tvergaard V (1982) Influence of void nucleation on ductile shear fracture at a free surface. J Mech Phys Solids 30:399–425

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Tvergaard V, Needleman A (1984) Analysis of the cup-cone fracture in a round tensile bar. Acta Metall 32:157–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Tvergaard V, Needleman A et al (1981) Flow localization in the plane strain tensile test. J Mech Phys Solids 29:115–142

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Bao Y, Wierzbicki T (2004) On fracture locus in the equivalent strain and stress triaxiality space. Int J Mech Sci 46:81–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lou Y, Huh H (2013) Evaluation of ductile fracture criteria in a general three-dimensional stress state considering the stress triaxiality and the lode parameter. Acta Mech Solida Sin 26:642–658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Xue L (2008) Constitutive modeling of void shearing effect in ductile fracture of porous materials. Eng Fract Mech 75:3343–3366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Soyarslan C, Malekipour Gharbi M, Tekkaya AE (2012) A combined experimental–numerical investigation of ductile fracture in bending of a class of ferritic–martensitic steel. Int J Solids Struct 49:1608–1626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dunand M, Mohr D (2011) On the predictive capabilities of the shear modified Gurson and the modified Mohr–coulomb fracture models over a wide range of stress triaxialities and lode angles. J Mech Phys Solids 59:1374–1394

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Xue Z, Pontin MG, Zok FW, Hutchinson JW (2010) Calibration procedures for a computational model of ductile fracture. Eng Fract Mech 77:492–509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Nahshon K, Xue Z (2009) A modified Gurson model and its application to punch-out experiments. Eng Fract Mech 76:997–1009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Tvergaard V, Nielsen KL (2010) Relations between a micro-mechanical model and a damage model for ductile failure in shear. J Mech Phys Solids 58:1243–1252

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Nielsen KL, Tvergaard V (2009) Effect of a shear modified Gurson model on damage development in a FSW tensile specimen. Int J Solids Struct 46:587–601

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Nielsen KL, Tvergaard V (2010) Ductile shear failure or plug failure of spot welds modelled by modified Gurson model. Eng Fract Mech 77:1031–1047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Abbassi F, Belhadj T, Mistou S, Zghal A (2013) Parameter identification of a mechanical ductile damage using artificial neural networks in sheet metal forming. Mater Des 45:605–615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Arunkumar S, Prakash RV (2016) Estimation of tensile properties of pressure vessel steel through automated ball indentation and small punch test. T Indian I Metals 69:1245–1256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Moreno MF (2016) Application of small punch testing on the mechanical and microstructural characterizations of P91 steel at room temperature. Int J Pres Ves Pip 142-143:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Nakata T, Komazaki S, Kohno Y, Tanigawa H (2016) Development of a small punch testing method to evaluate the creep property of high Cr ferritic steel: part I—effect of atmosphere on creep deformation behavior. Mater Sci Eng A 666:54–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hu R, Ling X (2009) Three-dimensional numerical simulation on plastic damage in small punch specimen of zirconium. Int J Press Vessel Pip 86:813–817

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Linse T, Kuna M, Viehrig HW (2014) Quantification of brittle-ductile failure behavior of ferritic reactor pressure vessel steels using the small-punch-test and micromechanical damage models. Mater Sci Eng A 614:136–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research is financially supported by the Key Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.11272075), China’s Post-doctoral Science Fund (2014M561223) and Fundamental Research Fund for the Central University (DUT16RC(4)28, DUT17JC38).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dan-tong Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ying, L., Wang, Dt., Liu, Wq. et al. On the numerical implementation of a shear modified GTN damage model and its application to small punch test. Int J Mater Form 11, 527–539 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-017-1362-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-017-1362-7

Keywords

Navigation