Abstract
Rising energy prices and customers’ increasing ecological awareness pushed energy efficient manufacturing to the top position in industrial interests. Actually, companies want to identify the most effective measures to increase energy efficiency in manufacturing processes looking at the sustainability of their product as a point of strength and not only as an extra-cost according to an ancient production vision. For the above considerations, the scientific community introduced in the last years newer technological alternatives to improve the global efficiency in production processes. Incremental Sheet Forming belongs to this family and can be classified as a flexible solution for the modern market requirement. Nowadays, if the points of strength of the above process are widely recognized, more efforts are still necessary to enhance the product performance allowing a wider industrial suitability. In particular, a significant problem which penalizes the quality of the manufacture parts, is the not homogeneous thickness distribution. The research here presented can be placed in this frame: a promising analytical model is highlighted and a user friendly procedure is set up to simplify the design phase with the aim to optimise the thickness distribution along the profile. Satisfactory experimental results which validate the proposed technique are also presented.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bunse K, Vodicka M, Schönsleben P, Brülhart M, Ernst FO (2010) Integrating energy efficiency performance in production management e gap analysis between industrial needs and scientific literature. J of Clean Prod. Article in Press.
IEA (2007a) Tracking Industrial, Energy Efficiency and CO2 Emissions. http://www.iea.org/textbase/nppdf/free/2007/tracking_emissions.pdf.
Jeswiet J, Micari F, Hirt G, Bramley A, Duflou J, Allwood J (2005) Asymmetric single point incremental forming of sheet metal. Annals CIRP 54(2):88–114
Shim M, Park JJ (2001) The formability of aluminum sheet in incremental forming. Int J Mat Proc Tech 113:654–658
Kim YH, Park JJ (2003) Effect of process parameters on formability in incremental forming of sheet metal. Int J Mat Proc Tech 130–131:42–46
Filice L (2006) A phenomenology based approach for modelling material thinning and formability in incremental forming of cylindrical parts. J Eng Manufac B 220/.9:1449–1455
Petek A, Gantar G, Pepelnjak T, Kuzman K (2007) Economical and ecological aspects of single point incremental forming versus deep drawing technology. Key Eng Mater 344:931–938
Ambrogio G, Filice L, Fratini L, Micari F (2003) Some relevant correlations between process parameters and process performance in incremental forming of metal sheets. Proceedings of the 6th Esaform Conference on Material Forming, pp 175–178
Hussain G, Gao L (2007) A novel method to test the thinning limit of sheet-metals in negative incremental forming. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 47:419–435
Ambrogio G, Filice L, Manco GL (2010) Analysis of the thickness distribution varying tool trajectory in single-point incremental forming. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture 225:348–356
Zettler J, Rezai H, Taleb-Araghi B, Bambach M, Hirt G (2007) Incremental sheet forming: process simulation with LS-DYna. Proc LS-Dyna Conf, pp C-I-9, C-I-20
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Filice, L., Ambrogio, G. & Gaudioso, M. Optimised tool-path design to reduce thinning in incremental sheet forming process. Int J Mater Form 6, 173–178 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-011-1065-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-011-1065-4