Lower Total Leukocyte and Neutrophil Counts in Healthy Young Africans from Uganda
The total leukocyte count (TLC) is an important component of the complete blood count and influences many clinical decisions. The effect of race or ethnicity on TLC is not well known. The African population has been reported to have lower than normal TLC and neutrophil counts. In this study, thirty eight African students referred for medical check up to a tertiary care hospital were included. Complete blood count was done on a three part automated hematology analyzer. Blood smear examination and manual differential count was also done. The control group included 38 age and sex matched healthy individuals. Student t test was used to compare the differences between the groups. The mean TLC in African students (4.95 ± 1.09 × 109/l) was significantly lower (p < 0.0001) than that seen in the control group (7.42 ± 1.7 × 109/l). The mean neutrophil percentage was also lower (49 ± 7.5%) in African students compared to the control group (63.6 ± 9.8%) [p < 0.0001] while lymphocyte percentage was higher (45.2 ± 7.5%) in the African students as compared to the control group (31.0 ± 9.3%) [p < 0.0001]. Absolute neutrophil count was also lower (2.45 ± 0.76 × 109/l) in African students compared to the control group (4.76 ± 1.47 × 109/l) while absolute lymphocyte count was comparable (2.21 ± 0.5 × 109/l vs. 2.26 ± 0.72 × 109/l) [p = 0.7212]. This study has shown lower leukocyte and neutrophil counts in apparently healthy African individuals. Knowledge of this variation from normal white cell and neutrophil counts is important in avoiding unnecessary investigations and influencing therapeutic decisions in these individuals.
KeywordsAfrican Ethnicity Neutrophil Race Total leukocyte count
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. No patient/subject identifying information has been disclosed in the manuscript. No patient/subject intervention was done and the subjects were not exposed to any risks during the study.
Since the study involved a retrospective review of data only from routine testing offered by the laboratory, separate informed consent was not taken for the study. “For this type of study formal consent is not required.”