Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative Political Science in Germany: an outsider’s view

  • Aufsätze
  • Published:
Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

In diesem Beitrag werden der Hintergrund und die Entwicklung der Vergleichenden Politikwissenschaft in Deutschland von einer Außenperspektive behandelt. Nach einem Blick auf die Anfänge wird die Phase der Professionalisierung intensiver betrachtet. Dabei kann der deutsche oder teutonische Stil nicht als Sonderweg angesehen werden, sondern als Bestandteil einer europäischen Version von vergleichender Forschung und Lehre. Dies zeigt sich, wenn unterschiedliche Forschungsfelder und die beteiligten Forschenden diskutiert werden. Allerdings erweist sich die allgemeine Entwicklung über Zeit und Raum uneinheitlich. Näher betrachtet wird die Entwicklung von Theorien und Konzepten und gleichfalls werden methodologische Fallstricke und Widersprüche diskutiert. Die generelle Konklusion aus einer Außenperspektive bestätigt, dass Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft in Deutschland nicht nur fest in den europäischen ‚Stil‘ eingebunden ist, sondern eine wichtige, wenn nicht führende Rolle dabei spielt.

Abstract

In this contribution the background and development of comparative political science in Germany is described from an outsider’s viewpoint. After having narrated the earlier developments, the era of professionalization is highlighted. Instead of what may have been thought to be the German — or ‘Teutonic’-style cannot and should not be considered as a ‘Sonderweg’ but is clearly embedded in the ‘European’ way of doing comparative political research and teaching. By discussing fields of research developed and the individuals actively concerned it is shown that this is the case. However, the overall development can be seen as an uneven one in terms of loci and time. In the remainder, a number of observations are made as regards theory development, approaches and also a few methodological caveats and pitfalls are discussed. The overall conclusion from an outsider’s view is that comparative political science in Germany is not only firmly embedded in the European ‘style’ but also fulfils an important if not a guiding role in this respect.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Bibliography

  • Armingeon, Klaus. (1994) Staat und Arbeitsbeziehungen. Ein internationaler Vergleich. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg-Schlosser, Dirk und Ferdinand Müller-Rommel. (1987, 2003) Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft: ein einführendes Handbuch. Opladen: Leske + Budrich

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg-Schlosser, D. and G. de Meur. (1997) Reduction of Complexity for a Small-N Analysis — A Stepwise Multi-Methodological Approach. In: Comparative Social Research (16) 133–162

  • Braun, D. (eds.). (2000) Public Policy and Federalism. Aldershot etc: Ashgate

    Google Scholar 

  • Budge, I., D. Robertson and D.J. Hearl. (1987) Ideology, Strategy and Party Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Budge, I. and H. Keman. (1990) Parties and Democracies. Coalition Formation and Government Functioning in 20 States. Oxford: Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Castles, F.G. (eds.). (1982) The Impact of Parties. Politics and Policies in Democratic Capitalist States. London: Sage Publications

    Google Scholar 

  • Czada, R., A. Héritier and H. Keman (eds.). (1998) Institutions and Political Choice. On the limits of Rationality. Amsterdam: VU-University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Daalder, H. (1993) Comparative Politics: The development of a sub-discipline. In: Keman, H. (eds.), Comparative Politics. Amsterdam: VU University Press: 18–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Daalder, H. (eds.). (1997) Comparative European Politics. The Story of a Profession. London, Washington: Pinter

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, R.A. (eds.). (1966) Political Oppositions in Western Democracies. New Haven: Yale University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Fauré, A. (1994) Some Methodological Problems in Comparative Politics. In: Journal of Theoretical Politics (6, 3). 307–322

  • Flora, P. (eds.). (1986) Growth to Limits. The Western European Welfare States since World War II. Vols 1, 2, 4. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedrich, C.J. (eds.). (1954) Totalitarianism. Cambridge Mass.: Harvard University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, M, M. Laver and P. Mair. (2000) Representative Government in Western Europe. New York: McGraw-Hill

    Google Scholar 

  • Held, D. (1995) Democracy and the global order: from the modern state to cosmopolitan governance. Cambridge: Polity Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Hix, S. (1999) The political system of the European Union. Basingstoke, Macmillan, New York: St. Martin’s Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Jahn, D. (2006) Einführung in die vergleichende Politikwissenschaft. Wiesbaden: VS-Verlag

    Google Scholar 

  • Keman, H. (1993) Comparative Politics: A distinctive approach to Political Science? In: Keman, H. Comparative Politics. Amsterdam: VU University Press: 31–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Keman, H. (eds.) (1997) The Politics of Problem-Solving in Postwar Democracies. Houndmills: Macmillan

    Google Scholar 

  • Keman, H. and PJ. Knegtmans (1997) De wording van de “zevende” en de politicologie in Nederland: een som van misverstanden. In: A. Gevers (red.) Uit de Zevende. Vijftig jaar politieke en sociaal-culturele wetenschappen aan de Universiteit van Amsterdam. Amsterdam: Het Spinhuis: 11–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Keman, H. (2002) Comparative Democratic Politics: A Guide to Contemporary Theory and Researc., London: Sage Publishers

    Google Scholar 

  • King, G., R.O. Keohane and S. Verba. (1994) Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Kropp, S. und M. Minkenberg (Hrsg.). (2005) Vergleichen in der Politikwissenschaft. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften

    Google Scholar 

  • Landman, T. (2003) Issues and Methods in Comparative Politics. An Introduction. London: Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauth, H-J. (Hrsg.). (2006) Vergleichende Regierungslehre: Eine Einführung. Wiesbaden: VS-Verlag

    Google Scholar 

  • Laver, M. and I. Budge. (1992) Party policy and government coalition. Basingstoke: MacMillan

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehner, F. und U. Widmaier. (1995) Vergleichende Regierungslehre. VS Taschenbuch Verlag

  • Lichbach, M. and A.S. Zuckerman (eds.). (1997) Comparative Politics: Rationality, Culture, and Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieberson, S. (1994) More on the Uneasy Case for Using Mill-Type Methods in Small-N Comparative Studies. In: Social Forces (72, 4). 1225–1237

  • Lijphart, A. (1971) Comparative Politics and the Comparative Method. In: American Political Science Review (65, 3). 682–693

  • Lijphart, A. (1975) The Comparable-Cases Strategy in Comparative Research. In: Comparative Political Studies (8, 2). 158–177

  • Lijphart, A. (1999) Patterns of Democracy: Government Form and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven: Yale University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, L.C. (1989) Redefining Comparative Politics: Promise Versus Performance. Newbury Park, CA: Sage

    Google Scholar 

  • Nettl, J.P. (1968) The State as a Conceptual Variable. In: World Politics (20/4). 559–592

  • Nölke, A. (2004) Transnationale Politiknetzwerke: Eine Analyse grenzüberschreitender politischer Entscheidungsprozesse jenseits des regierungszentrischen Modells. Habilitationsschrift. Universität Leipzig: Fakultät für Sozialwissenschaften und Philosophie

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennings, P., H. Keman and J. Kleinnijenhuis. (2006) Doing Research in Political Science. An introduction to comparative methods and statistics. London: Sage

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennings, P. and J-E. Lane (eds.). (1998) Comparing Party System Change. London: Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Przeworski, A. (1987) Methods of Cross-National Research, (1970–83). An Overview. In: Dierkes, Meinolf and Hans N. Weiler (Hrsg.) Comparative Policy Research: Learning from Experience. Aldershot: Gower. 31–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Przeworski, A. and H. Teune. (1970) The Logic of Comparative Social Enquiry. New York: Wiley

    Google Scholar 

  • Ragin, Ch.C. (1987) The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Ragin, Ch.C. (2000) Fuzzy-Set Social Science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Reif, Karlheinz. (1997) Vergleichende Parteien- und Verbändeforschung. In: Berg-Schlossler, Dirk und Ferdinand Müller-Rommel (Hrsg.). Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft. Opladen: Leske + Budrich. 175–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, R., (eds.). (1974) Electoral Behavior: A Comparative Handbook. New York: Free Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartori, G. (eds.) (1984) Social science concepts: A systematic analysis. Beverly Hills: Sage

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartori, G. (1991) Comparing and Miscomparing. In: Journal of Theoretical Politics (3, 3). 243–257

  • Scharpf, F.W. (1991) Crisis and Choice in European Social Democracy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf, F.W. (1997) Games Real Actors Play. Boulder, Col.: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf, F.W. (1998) Political Institutions, Decision Styles and Policy Choices. In: Czada et al. (eds.). Institutions and Political Choice. On the limits of Rationality. Amsterdam: VU-University Press. 53–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf, F.W. (1999) Governing in Europe. Effective and Democratic? Oxford: Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, M.G. (1982) Wohlfahrtsstaatliche Politik unter bürgerlichen und sozialdemokratischen Regierungen. Ein internationaler Vergleich. Frankfurt a.M.: Campus

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, M. G. (1989) Social policy in rich and poor countries: socio-economic trends and political-institutional determinants. In: European Journal of Political Research (17). 641–659

  • Schmitter, P.C. and G. Lehmbruch (eds.). (1979) Trends Towards Corporatist Intermediation. London: Sage

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitter, P.C. (2005) What Future For Comparative Politics? Working Paper EUI: Florence

  • Wildenmann, R. and F.G. Castles (eds.). (1986) Visions and realities of party government. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter

    Google Scholar 

  • Woldendorp, J., H. Keman and I. Budge. (2000) Party Government in 48 Democracies (1945–1998). Composition — Duration — Personnel. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hans Keman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Keman, H. Comparative Political Science in Germany: an outsider’s view. Z Vgl Polit Wiss 1, 66–79 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12286-007-0007-5

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12286-007-0007-5

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation