Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Welche vertikale Implantatposition ist die richtige?

Which vertical implant position is correct?

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
Der MKG-Chirurg Aims and scope

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund

Fehlpositionierungen von Implantaten in der vertikalen Ebene sind in vielen Fällen v. a. im ästhetischen Bereich nur durch eine Explantation zu korrigieren. Doch welche vertikale Implantatposition ist die richtige, um ein langfristig stabiles ästhetisches und funktionelles Ergebnis im Front- und Seitenzahnbereich zu erzielen.

Material und Methode

Zur Beantwortung dieser Frage wurden die Ergebnisse der 9. Europäischen Konsensuskonferenz (EuCC) im März 2014 in Köln unter Federführung des Bundesverbands der implantologisch tätigen Zahnärzte in Europa (BDIZ EDI) sowie einer aktuellen Literaturrecherche herangezogen.

Ergebnisse

Die Ergebnisse werden anhand des Resorptionsverhaltens von Implantaten mit verschiedener Implantathalskonfiguration bei unterschiedlich tiefer Implantatinsertion erläutert.

Abstract

Background

In many cases incorrect positioning of implants in the vertical plane can only corrected only by explantation, especially in the aesthetic zone; however, what vertical implant position is correct in order to achieve stable long-term aesthetic and functional results in the anterior and posterior dentition?

Material and methods

In order to answer this question the results of the 9th European Consensus Conference (EuCC) from March 2014 in Cologne under the leadership of the European Association of Dental Implantologists (BDIZ EDI) and a recent literature review were included.

Results

The results are discussed with respect to the resorption behavior of implants under conditions of varying depths of implant insertion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3
Abb. 4

Literatur

  1. Buser D, Martin W, Belser UC (2004) Optimizing esthetics for implant restorations in the anterior maxilla: anatomic and surgical considerations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 19(Suppl):43–61

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Buser D, Arx T von (2000) Surgical procedures in partially edentulous patients with ITI implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 11(suppl 1):83–100

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 9. Europäische Konsensuskonferenz (EuCC) in Köln (2014) Leitfaden – Fehlpositionierung von Implantaten vermeiden. BDIZ EDI (Hrsg.). www.bdizedi.org

  4. Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, Brånemark PI (1981) A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg 10(6):387–416

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eriksson AR (1986) The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1(1):11–25

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cox JF, Zarb GA (1987) The longitudinal clinical efficacy of osseointegrated dental implants: a 3‑year report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2(2):91–100

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Jemt T, Lekholm U, Gröndahl K (1990) 3‑year followup study of early single implant restorations ad modum Brånemark. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 10(5):340–349

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Adell R, Eriksson B, Lekholm U, Brånemark PI, Jemt T (1990) Long-term follow-up study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of totally edentulous jaws. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 5(4):347–359

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Johansson LA, Ekfeldt (2003) Implant-supported fixed partial prostheses: a retrospective study. Int J Prosthodont 16(2):172–176

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bratu EA, Tandlich M, Shapira L (2009) A rough surface implant neck with microthreads reduces the amount of marginal bone loss: a prospective clinical study. Clin Oral Implants Res 20(8):827–832

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Rokn AR, Badri S, Rasouli GAA, Manasheof R, Kharazi FMJ, Barikani H (2015) Comparison of bone loss around bone platform shift and non-bone platform shift implants after 12 months. J Dent (Tehran) 12(3):183–187

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gultekin BA, Gultekin P, Leblebicioglu B, Basegmez C, Yalcin S (2013) Clinical evaluation of marginal bone loss and stability in two types of submerged dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 28(3):815–823

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ungor C, Guven A, Songur T, Dayisoylu E, Kurt H, Tosun E, Senel FC (2013) Marginal bone resorption around dental implants placed in grafted sinuses; an up-to-30-month clinical and radiological follow-up. J Pak Med Assoc 63(9):1124–1128

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rismanchian M, Fazel A, Rakhshan V, Eblaghian G (2011) One-year clinical and radiographic assessment of fluoride-enhanced implants on immediate non-functional loading in posterior maxilla and mandible: a pilot prospective clinical series study. Clin Oral Implants Res 22(12):1440–1445

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Roccuzzo M, Bunino M, Prioglio F, Bianchi SD (2001) Early loading of sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) implants: a prospective split-mouth comparative study. Clin Oral Implants Res 12(6):572–578

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Salvi GE, Gallini G, Lang NP (2004) Early loading (2 or 6 weeks) of sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) ITI implants in the posterior mandible. A 1‑year randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 15(2):142–149

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Behneke A, Behneke N, d’Hoedt B (2000) The longitudinal clinical effectiveness of ITI solid-screw implants in partially edentulous patients: a 5‑year follow-up report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 15(5):633–645

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Behneke A, Behneke N, d’Hoedt B, Wagner W (1997) Hard and soft tissue reactions to ITI screw implants: 3‑year longitudinal results of a prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 12(6):749–757

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Piao CM, Lee JE, Koak JY, Kim SK, Rhyu IC, Han CH, Herr Y, Heo SJ (2009) Marginal bone loss around three different implant systems: radiographic evaluation after 1 year. J Oral Rehabil 36(10):748–754

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lee SY, Piao CM, Koak JY, Kim SK, Kim YS, Ku Y, Rhyu IC, Han CH, Heo SJ (2010) A 3‑year prospective radiographic evaluation of marginal bone level around different implant systems. J Oral Rehabil 37(7):538–544

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Shin YK, Han CH, Heo SJ, Kim S, Chun HJ (2006) Radiographic evaluation of marginal bone level around implants with different neck designs after 1 year. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 21(5):789–794

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Aloy-Prósper A, Maestre-Ferrín L, Peñarrocha-Oltra D, Peñarrocha-Diago M (2011) Marginal bone loss in relation to the implant neck surface: an update. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 16(3):365–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Atieh MA, Ibrahim HM, Atieh AH (2010) Platform switching for marginal bone preservation around dental implants: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Periodontol 81(10):1350–1366

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Annibali S, Bignozzi I, Cristalli MP, Graziani F, Monaca G La, Polimeni A (2012) Peri-implant marginal bone level: a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing platform switching versus conventionally restored implants. J Clin Periodontol 39(11):1097–1113

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Mailoa J, Fu JH, Chan HL, Khoshkam V, Li J, Wang HL (2015) The effect of vertical implant position in relation to adjacent teeth on marginal bone loss in posterior arches: A retrospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 30(4):931–936

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Yi JM, Lee JK, Um HS, Chang BS, Lee MK (2010) Marginal bony changes in relation to different vertical positions of dental implants. J Periodontal Implant Sci 40(5):244–248

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Hämmerle CH, Brägger U, Bürgin W, Lang NP (1996) The effect of subcrestal placement of the polished surface of ITI implants on marginal soft and hard tissues. Clin Oral Implants Res 7(2):111–119

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Huang B, Meng H, Piao M, Xu L, Zhang L, Zhu W (2012) Influence of placement depth on bone remodeling around tapered internal connection implant: a clinical and radiographic study in dogs. J Periodontol 83(9):1164–1171

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Huang B, Meng H, Zhu W, Witek L, Tovar N, Coelho PG (2015) Influence of placement depth on bone remodeling around tapered internal connection implant: a histologic study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res 26(8):942–949

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Koutouzis T, Neiva R, Nair M, Nonhoff J, Lundgren T (2014) Cone beam computed tomographic evaluation of implants with platform-switched Morse taper connection with the implant-abutment interface at different levels in relation to the alveolar crest. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 29(5):1157–1163

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Pellicer-Chover H, Peñarrocha-Diago MA, Peñarrocha-Oltra D, Gomar-Vercher S, Agustín-Panadero R, Peñarrocha-Diago M (2016) Impact of crestal and subcrestal implant placement in peri-implant bone: A prospective comparative study. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 21(1):e103–10

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Araujo M, Wennstrom JL, Lindhe J (2006) Modelling of buccal and lingual bone walls of fresh extraction sites following implant installation. Clin Oral Implants Res 17(6):606–614

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Botticelli D, Persson LG, Lindhe J, Berglundh T (2006) Bone tissue formation adjacent to implants placed in fresh extraction sockets: an experimental study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res 17(4):351–358

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Chen ST, Buser D (2014) Esthetic outcomes following immediate and early implant placement in the anterior maxilla – a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 29(Suppl):186–215

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Ferrus J, Cecchinato D, Pjetursson EB, Lang NP, Sanz M, Lindhe (2010) Factors influencing ridge alterations following immediate implant placement into extraction sockets. Clin Oral Implants Res 21(1):22–29

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Grunder U (2011) Crestal ridge width changes when placing implants at the time of tooth extraction with and without soft tissue augmentation after a healing period of 6 months: report of 24 consecutive cases. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 31(1):9–17

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Chung S, Rungcharassaeng K, Kan JY, Roe P, Lozada JL (2011) Immediate single tooth replacement with subepithelial connective tissue graft using platform switching implants: a case series. J Oral Implantol 37(5):559–569

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Reinhardt S (2012) Immediate implants with a simultaneous soft-tissue graft – 2 years results of a new technique. Z Zahnärztl Implantol 3:240–224

    Google Scholar 

  39. Negri B, Calvo-Guirado JL, Pardo-Zamora G, Ramírez-Fernández MP, Delgado-Ruíz RA, Muñoz-Guzón F (2012) Peri-implant bone reactions to immediate implants placed at different levels in relation to crestal bone. Part I: a pilot study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res 23(2):228–235

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Calvo-Guirado JL, Boquete-Castro A, Negri B, Delgado RR, Gómez-Moreno G, Iezzi G (2014) Crestal bone reactions to immediate implants placed at different levels in relation to crestal bone. A pilot study in Foxhound dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res 25(3):344–351

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Gemeinschaftspraxis Dr. B. Drüke, Dr. St. Reinhardt, Dr. Josef Janzen, Dr. A. Broschk, Schorlemer Str. 16, 48143, Münster, Deutschland

    S. Reinhardt

Authors
  1. S. Reinhardt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Reinhardt.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

S. Reinhardt gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Dieser Beitrag beinhaltet keine vom Autor durchgeführten Studien an Menschen oder Tieren.

Additional information

Redaktion

M. Bonsmann, Düsseldorf

H. Terheyden, Kassel

H.-P. Ulrich, Lübeck

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Reinhardt, S. Welche vertikale Implantatposition ist die richtige?. MKG-Chirurg 9, 101–106 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12285-016-0053-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12285-016-0053-6

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Search

Navigation