Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Leitlinie Wurzelspitzenresektion der DGMKG/BZÄK

Entstehung, Inhalte, Grenzen

Guidelines on apicectomy of the German Society for Oral and Craniomaxillofacial Medicine/German Federal Dental Association

Development, contents, limits

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
Der MKG-Chirurg Aims and scope

Zusammenfassung

Die langjährige, mitunter leidenschaftlich geführte Kontroverse um die Indikation zur Wurzelspitzenresektion mit scheinbar unüberbrückbaren Ansichten in den Disziplinen der Endodontologie und Chirurgie hat zu einer erheblichen Verunsicherung in der Therapieentscheidung bei einem der häufigsten chirurgischen Eingriffe in der Zahnheilkunde geführt. Aus diesem Grund haben die deutschen zahnmedizinischen wissenschaftlichen Fachgesellschaften unter Federführung der Bundeszahnärztekammer eine S2-Leitlinie zur Indikationsstellung bei der Wurzelspitzenresektion erarbeitet, die nach einem langwierigen Konsensusprozess im Jahr 2007 abgeschlossen und publiziert wurde. Der vorliegende Beitrag soll zum einen eine kurze Übersicht zu methodischen Aspekten und Problemen der Leitlinienerstellung geben und zum anderen die deutschen Leitlinienempfehlungen zur Indikationsstellung vorstellen.

Abstract

The longstanding, sometimes passionately discussed controversy over the indications for apicectomy with apparently irreconcilable viewpoints between endodontology and surgery, has led to considerable uncertainty in therapy decision-making for one of the most common surgical interventions in dentistry. For this reason the German dental scientific societies under the lead management of the German Federal Dental Association have produced S2 guidelines on the indications for apicectomy, which were finalized and published in 2007 after a prolonged consensus process. This article gives a brief overview of the methodological aspects and problems with production of the guidelines and also presents the German guideline recommendations for evaluation of indications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Abb. 1

Literatur

  1. Boucher Y, Matossian L, Rilliard F, Machtou P (2002) Radiographic evaluation of the prevalence and technical quality of root canal treatment in a French subpopulation. Int Endod J 35:229–238

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chueh L-H, Chen S-C, Lee C-M et al (2003) Technical quality of root canal treatment in Taiwan. Int Endod J 36:416–422

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Danin J, Strömberg T, Forsgren H et al (1996) Clinical management of nonhealing periradicular pathosis – surgery versus endodontic retreatment. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 82:213–217

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Del Fabbro M, Taschieri S, Testori T et al (2007) Surgical versus non-surgical endodontic re-treatment for periradicular lesions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3:CD005511

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dugas NN, Lawrence HP, Teplitsky PE et al (2003) Periapical health and treatment quality assessment of root filled teeth in two Canadian populations. Int Endod J 36:181–192

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Eriksen HM, Kirkevang LL, Peterson K (2002) Endodontic epidemiology and treatment outcome, general considerations. Endod Topics 2:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Friedman S (2002) Prognosis of initial endodontic therapy. Endod Topics 2:59–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Harradine NWT, Pearson MH, Toth B (1998) The effect of extraction of third molars on late lower incisor crowding: a randomized controlled trial. Br J Orthod 25:117–122

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kirkevang L-L, Hörsted-Bindslev P, Orstavik D, Wenzel A (2001) Frequency and distribution of endodontically treated teeth and apical periodontitis in an urban Danish population. Int Endod J 34:198–205

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kirkevang L-L, Orstavik D, Hörsted-Bindslev P, Wenzel A (2000) Periapical status and quality of root fillings and coronal restorations in a Danish population. Int Endod J 33:509–515

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kunkel M, Allroggen S, Appel C et al (2007) Leitlinie Wurzelspitzenresektion. Mund Kiefer GesichtsChir 11:251–257

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kvist T, Reit C (1999) Results of endodontic retreatment: a randomized clinical study comparing surgical and nonsurgical procedures J Endod 25:814–817

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lupi-Pegurier L, Bertrand M-F, Muller-Bola M et al (2002) Periapical status, prevalence and quality of endodontic treatment in an adult French population. Int Endod J 35:690–697

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Mettes TG, Nienhuijs MEL, Sanden WJM van der et al (2007) Interventions for treating asymptomatic impacted wisdom teeth in adolescents and adults (Review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2:CD003879

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ng Y-L, Mann V, Gulabivala K (2008) Outcome of secondary root canal treatment: a systematic review of the literature. Int Endod J 41:1026–1046

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Patel S, Dawood A, Mannocci F et al (2009) Detection of periapical bone defects in human jaws using cone beam computed tomography and intraoral radiography. Int Endod J 42:507–515

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Song F, O’Meara S, Wilson P et al (2000) The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of prophylactic removal of wisdom teeth. Health Technol Assess 4:1–15

    Google Scholar 

  18. Weiger R, Hitzler S, Hermla G, Löst C (1997) Periapical status, quality of root canal fillings and estimated endodontic treatment need in an urban German population. Endod Dent Traumatol 13(2):69–74

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Wu M-K, Shemesh H, Wesselink PR (2009) Limitations of previously published systematic reviews evaluating the outcome of endodontic treatment. Int Endod J 42:656–666

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Interessenkonflikt

Der korrespondierende Autor gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Klinik für Mund-, Kiefer- und plastische Gesichtschirurgie der Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum-Langendreer, In der Schornau 23–25, 44892, Bochum, Deutschland

    M. Kunkel

Authors
  1. M. Kunkel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Kunkel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kunkel, M. Leitlinie Wurzelspitzenresektion der DGMKG/BZÄK. MKG-Chirurg 3, 115–120 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12285-009-0140-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12285-009-0140-z

Schlüsselworter

Keywords

Search

Navigation