Skip to main content

On metrics to assess road bicycle dynamic comfort during impacts

Sports Engineering volume 25, Article number: 1 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

A road bicycle’s dynamic comfort relates to its capacity to filter vibration generated by the road surface. Typically, four quantities have been used to assess a road bicycle’s dynamic comfort, acceleration, force, power, and energy; however, little has been done to compare the effectiveness of these in distinguishing between impact events. The aim of this study was to assess the ability of these four quantities when measured at a cyclist’s hands, to discriminate between small changes in the level of an impact load applied at the front wheel of a road bicycle. With a rider seated on a bicycle, acceleration and force time signals were recorded at the left and right hands using instrumented brake hoods during a series of impacts at the front wheel on a bicycle treadmill. Six derived parameters of the acceleration, force, and power time signals were considered: discrete values: maximum, peak; mean values: root-mean-square, root-mean-quad; ratio values: crest factor, shock content quotient. Integral values were used for the energy. Various criteria were developed to assess the performance of these parameters and whether they should be recommended as road bicycle dynamic comfort metrics for impact events. The criteria were related to three characteristics: the consistency of the measurements, the parameter’s statistical discrimination power, and how well changes in the parameter matched corresponding changes in impact level. The energy and root-mean-square value of power were found to be the top performers and are recommended as road bicycle dynamic comfort metrics for impact events. All acceleration-based parameters are not recommended. The remaining parameters demonstrated mixed results.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price includes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

References

  1. Lépine J, Champoux Y, Drouet J-M (2015) The relative contribution of road bicycle components on vibration induced to the cyclist. Sports Eng 18:79–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ayachi F, Dorey S, Guastavino C (2015) Identifying factors of bicycle comfort: an online survey with enthusiast cyclists. Appl Erg 46:124–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Vanwalleghem J, Mortier F, De Baere I, Loccufier M, Van Paepegem W (2012) Design of an instrumented bicycle for the evaluation of bicycle dynamics and its relation with the cyclist’s comfort. Procedia Eng 34:485–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Champoux Y, Vanwallenghem J, Drouet J-M (2015) Dynamic calibration of an instrumented bicycle brake hood in measuring power absorbed by the hands. Procedia Eng 112:225–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Caya A, Champoux Y, Drouet J-M (2012) Dynamic behaviour and measurement accuracy of a bicycle brake hood force transducer. Procedia Eng 34:526–531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Vanwalleghem J, De Baere I, Loccufier M, Van Paepegem W (2015) Dynamic calibration of a strain gauge based handlebar force sensor for cycling purposes. Procedia Eng 112:219–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Petrone N, Giubilato F (2013) Development of a test method for the comparative analysis of bicycle saddle vibration transmissibility. Procedia Eng 60:288–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Thite AN, Gerguri S, Coleman F, Doody M, Fisher N (2013) Development of an experimental methodology to evaluate the influence of a bamboo frame on the bicycle ride comfort. Veh Syst Dyn 51:1287–1304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lépine J, Champoux Y, Drouet J-M (2014) Road bike comfort: on the measurement of vibrations induced to cyclist. Sports Eng 17:113–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Pelland-Leblanc J-P, Lepine J, Champoux Y, Drouet J-M (2014) Using power as a metric to quantify vibration transmitted to the cyclist. Procedia Eng 72:392–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lépine J, Champoux Y, Drouet J-M (2016) Test protocol for in-situ bicycle wheel dynamic comfort comparison. Procedia Eng 147:568–572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lépine J, Champoux Y, Drouet J-M (2013) A laboratory excitation technique to test road bike vibration transmission. Exp Tech 40:227–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mason G, Larson M, Deng R, Reed D, Pahlmeyer M, Wright N, Wu Z, Yahata J (2016) A robust low cost device for measuring road induced vibrations. J Sci Cycling 5:13–17

    Google Scholar 

  14. Petrone N, Giubilato F (2011) Comparative analysis of wheels vibration transmissibility after full bicycle laboratory tests, 40̊ Convegno Nazionale AIAS, Palermo

  15. Giubilato F, Petrone N (2012) A method for evaluating the vibrational response of racing bicycles wheels under road roughness excitation. Procedia Eng 34:409–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Olieman M, Marin-Perianu R, Marin-Perianu M (2012) Measurement of dynamic comfort in cycling using wireless acceleration sensors. Procedia Eng 34:568–573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Pelland-Leblanc J-P, Lépine J, Champoux Y, Drouet J-M (2014) Effect of structural damping on vibrations transmitted to road cyclists. In: De Clerck J (ed) Topics in modal analysis I, conference proceedings of the society for experimental mechanics series, vol 7. Springer, Cham

    Google Scholar 

  18. Drouet J-M, Covill D, Duarte W (2018) On the exposure of hands to vibration in road cycling: an assessment of the effect of gloves and handlebar tape. Proceedings 2:213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Marcolin G, Paoli A, Panizzolo FA, Biasco G, Petrone N (2010) A method for the analysis of cyclist shorts with different pads for perineal area protection: comparison between drum and road tests. Procedia Eng 2:2831–2835

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hölzel C, Höchtl F, Senner V (2012) Cycling comfort on different road surfaces. Procedia Eng 34:479–484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Litzenberger S, Christensen T, Hofstätter O, Sabo A (2018) Prediction of road surface quality during cycling using smartphone accelerometer data. Proceedings 2:217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Taylor M D, Edgar A, Raine M (2018) Scottish cycling pavement assessment using hand–arm vibration exposure. Infrastructure Asset Management, pp 1–16

  23. Bíl M, Andrášik R, Kubeček J (2015) How comfortable are your cycling tracks? A new method for objective bicycle vibration measurement. Transport Res Part C Emerg Technol 56:415–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Nuñez J Y M, Bisconsini D R, Rodrigues da Silva A N (2018) Combining environmental quality assessment of bicycle infrastructures with vertical acceleration measurements. Transport Res Part A Policy Pract

  25. Richard S, Champoux Y, Lépine J, Drouet J-M (2015) Using an alternative forced-choice method to study shock perception at cyclists’ hands: the effect of tyre pressure. Procedia Eng 112:361–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Drouet J-M, Guastavino C, Girard N (2016) Perceptual thresholds for shock-type excitation of the front wheel of a road bicycle at the cyclist’s hands. Procedia Eng 147:724–729

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ayachi FS, Drouet J-M, Champoux Y, Guastavino C (2018) Perceptual thresholds for vibration transmitted to road cyclists. Hum Factors 60:844–854

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. ISO/TS 15694:2004 Mechanical vibration and shock—measurement and evaluation of single shocks transmitted from hand-held and hand-guided machines to the hand-arm system

  29. Efron B, Tibshirani RJ (1993) An introduction to the bootstrap. Chapman and Hall, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  30. Wood M (2005) Bootstrapped confidence intervals as an approach to statistical inference. Organ Res Methods 8:454–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Gardner MJ, Altman D (1986) Confidence intervals rather than P values: estimation rather than hypothesis testing. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 292:746–750

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Lee DK (2016) Alternatives to P value: confidence interval and effect size. Kor J Anesthesiol 69:555–562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Hinkle DE, Wiersma W, Jurs SG (2003) Applied statistics for behavioural sciences, 5th edn. Houghton Mifflin, Boston

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. VÉLUS Laboratory, Mechanical Engineering Department, Université de Sherbrooke, 2500 boulevard de l’Université, Sherbrooke, QC, J1K 2R1, Canada

    Jean-Marc Drouet, Marianne Leroux & Simon Richard

  2. School of Computing, Engineering and Mathematics, University of Brighton, Cockcroft Building, Lewes Road, Brighton, BN2 4GJ, UK

    Derek Covill

Authors
  1. Jean-Marc Drouet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Derek Covill
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Marianne Leroux
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Simon Richard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jean-Marc Drouet.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Drouet, JM., Covill, D., Leroux, M. et al. On metrics to assess road bicycle dynamic comfort during impacts. Sports Eng 25, 1 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12283-021-00366-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12283-021-00366-x

Keywords

  • Comfort metrics
  • Vibration
  • Impact loads
  • Acceleration
  • Force
  • Power
  • Energy