A multi-sensor system for automatic analysis of classical cross-country skiing techniques
- 971 Downloads
Commercial systems utilizing data from inertial measurement units (IMUs) to analyse movement patterns have not yet been adapted to monitor daily training in cross-country (XC) skiing. The main purposes of this study are to investigate: (1) the feasibility and potential of a multi-sensor system consisting of a heart rate sensor, global navigation satellite systems (GNSSs) data and seven IMUs placed at multiple locations on the body for outdoor XC skiing, and (2) the validity of employing hard decision rules based on the correlation between arms and legs for detecting sub-techniques in classical XC skiing. All sensor data were synchronously sampled and synchronized with GNSS data from a commercially available sports watch while XC skiing on varying tracks, from amateur skiers and world-class athletes. An algorithm based on the correlation of the angular velocity of arms and legs was developed to detect the three main classic sub-techniques, diagonal, double poling with a kick and double poling. Other sub-techniques were classified as miscellaneous (0–20%). The system is shown to work well outdoors on snow during different conditions, and the implemented algorithm was validated by video analyses to detect the three sub-techniques with a sensitivity of 99–100%. This study is the first to detect and link sub-techniques in XC skiing to GNSS data, thereby associating the detection and distribution of sub-techniques to different terrains. Such information gives insight into the technical and tactical aspects of skiers’ daily training and competitions, thereby providing a tool for coaches and athletes.
KeywordsCross-country technique Classical sub-techniques Inertial measurement units Physiological sensors Movement sensors
This work is part of the emPower Project, an IPN Project in the BIA Program supported by the Norwegian Research Council and Madshus, Project Number 245622. We thank the skiers for their participation in the study and Madshus for technical support during field tests.
- 13.Sakurai Y, Fujita Z, Ishige Y (2014) Automated identification and evaluation of subtechniques in classical-style roller skiing. J Sports Sci Med 13:651–657Google Scholar
- 14.Sakurai Y, Zenya F, Ishige Y (2016) Automated identification and evaluation of subtechniques in skating-style roller skiing. Sensors 16(473):651–657Google Scholar
- 15.Seeberg TM, Vedum J, Sandsund M, Austad HO, Liverud AE, Vardøy A-SB, Svagård I, Strisland F (2014) Development of a wearable multisensor device enabling continuous monitoring of vital signs and activity. Biomedical and Health Informatics. IEEE-EMBS International Conference. IEEE Press, Spain, pp 213–218Google Scholar
- 16.Liverud A, Vedum J, Fleurey F, Seeberg TM (2012) Wearable wireless multi-parameter sensor module for physiological monitoring. International conference on wearable micro and nano technologies for personalized health, Portugal, pp 210–215. http://www.iospress.nl/book/phealth-2012/
- 17.Dalgard S, Fleurey F, Liverud AE (2014) Peer synchronization method for wireless sensor networks using heterogeneous bluetooth sensor nodes. International conference on sensor networks, pp 175–180Google Scholar
- 18.Dahl C, Sandbakk O, Danielsen J, Ettema G (2014) The role of power fluctuations in the preference of diagonal vs. double poling sub-technique at different incline-speed combinations in elite cross-country skiers. Front Physiol 8:94Google Scholar