Advertisement

Sports Engineering

, Volume 20, Issue 4, pp 255–266 | Cite as

Ice hockey skate starts: a comparison of high and low calibre skaters

  • Philippe J. RenaudEmail author
  • Shawn M. K. Robbins
  • Philippe C. Dixon
  • Jaymee R. Shell
  • René A. Turcotte
  • David J. Pearsall
Original Article

Abstract

The forward skating start is a fundamental skill for ice hockey players, yet extremely challenging given the low traction of the ice surface. The technique for maximum skating acceleration of the body is not well understood. The aim of this study was to evaluate kinematic ice hockey skating start movement technique in relation to a skater’s skill level. A 10-camera motion capture system placed on the ice surface recorded “hybrid-V” skate start movement patterns of high and low calibre male ice hockey players (n = 7, 8, respectively). Participants’ lower body kinematics and estimated body centre of mass (CoM) movement during the first four steps were calculated. Both skate groups had similar lower body strength profiles, yet high calibre skaters achieved greater velocity; skating technique differences most likely explained the performance differences between the groups. Unlike over ground sprint start technique, skating starts showed greater concurrent hip abduction, external rotation and extension, presumably for ideal blade-to-ice push-off orientation for propulsion. Initial analysis revealed similar hip, knee and ankle joint gross movement patterns across skaters, however, further scrutiny of the data revealed that high calibre skaters achieved greater vertical CoM acceleration during each step that in turn allowed greater horizontal traction, forward propulsion, lower double-support times and, accordingly, faster starts with higher stride rates.

Keywords

Ice hockey Ice skating Biomechanics 3D kinematics Motion capture Hip Knee Ankle 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was financially supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) under [Grant Number CRDPJ 453725-13]; as well as Bauer Hockey Corp. The authors would like to thank Adrien Gerbé and Spencer Paveck for their help during the data collection process.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Hamel J (2011) What is the maximum speed ice hockey players reach? https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-maximum-speed-ice-hockey-players-reach. Accessed 3 Mar 2016
  2. 2.
    NHL (2015) NHL Skills Competition All-Time Results, 1990–2012. http://www.nhl.com/ice/page.htm?id=67157. Accessed 3 Mar 2016
  3. 3.
    Marino G (1995) Biomechanics of power skating: past research, future trends. In: Proceedings of the XIII international symposium for biomechanics in sport, International Society for Biomechanics in Sport. Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, ON, pp 246–252Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lafontaine D (2007) Three-dimensional kinematics of the knee and ankle joints for three consecutive push-offs during ice hockey skating starts. Sports Biomech 6(3):391–406. doi: 10.1080/14763140701491427 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    McPherson MN, Wrigley A, Montelpare WJ, Pearsall D, Ashare A (2004) The biomechanical characteristics of development-age hockey players: determining the effects of body size on the assessment of skating technique. In: Safety in ice hockey, pp 272–287Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Shackel B (2008) A biomechanical comparison of starting technique in speed skating and hockey. M.Sc. thesis, University of ManitobaGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Buckeridge E, LeVangie MC, Stetter B, Nigg SR, Nigg BM (2015) An on-ice measurement approach to analyse the biomechanics of ice hockey skating. PLoS One 10(5):e0127324. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127324 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dewan C, Pearsall D, Turcotte R (2004) Ankle kinematics during forward hockey skating: acceleration to constant velocity. In: International Society for the Biomechanics of Sport, pp 387–390Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zuiker T (2014) The effects of different speed skating push-off techniques on the mechanical power, power distribution and energy expenditure. Dissertation, Delft University of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Upjohn T, Turcotte R, Pearsall DJ, Loh J (2008) Three-dimensional kinematics of the lower limbs during forward ice hockey skating. Sports Biomech 7(2):206–221. doi: 10.1080/14763140701841621 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Stidwill TJ, Pearsall D, Turcotte R (2010) Comparison of skating kinetics and kinematics on ice and on a synthetic surface. Sports Biomech 9(1):57–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Stull JD, Philippon MJ, LaPrade RF (2011) “At-risk” positioning and hip biomechanics of the Peewee ice hockey sprint start. Am J Sports Med 39(Suppl):29S–35S. doi: 10.1177/0363546511414012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    de Koning J, Thomas R, Berger M, de Groot G, van Ingen Schenau G (1995) The start in speed skating: from running to gliding. Med Sci Sports Exerc 27(12):1703–1708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chang R, Turcotte R, Pearsall D (2009) Hip adductor muscle function in forward skating. Sports Biomech 8(3):212–222. doi: 10.1080/14763140903229534 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Oxford Metrics Ltd (1999) Plug-in Gait. Oxford Metrics Ltd, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ernst M, Götze M, Müller R, Blickhan R (2014) Vertical adaptation of the center of mass in human running on uneven ground. Hum Mov Sci 38:293–304. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2014.05.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Myklebust H, Gloersen O, Hallen J (2015) Validity of ski skating center of mass displacement measured by a single inertial measurement unit. J Appl Biomech. doi: 10.1123/jab.2015-0081 Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Baker R, Finney L, Orr J (1999) A new approach to determine the hip rotation profile from clinical gait analysis data. Hum Mov Sci 18(5):655–667. doi: 10.1016/S0167-9457(99)00027-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Robertson DGE, Dowling JJ (2003) Design and responses of Butterworth and critically damped digital filters. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 13(6):569–573. doi: 10.1016/S1050-6411(03)00080-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dixon PC, Tisseyre M, Damavandi M, Pearsall DJ (2011) Inter-segment foot kinematics during cross-slope running. Gait Posture 33(4):640–644. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.02.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zeni JA Jr, Richards JG, Higginson JS (2008) Two simple methods for determining gait events during treadmill and overground walking using kinematic data. Gait Posture 27(4):710–714. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2007.07.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hreljac A, Marshall RN (2000) Algorithms to determine event timing during normal walking using kinematic data. J Biomech 33(6):783–786CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Dixon PC, Loh JJ, Michaud-Paquette Y, Pearsall DJ (2016) biomechZoo: an open-source toolbox for the processing, analysis, and visualization of biomechanical movement data. Comput Methods Progr Biomed. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2016.11.007 Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Armstrong RA (2014) When to use the Bonferroni correction. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 34(5):502–508. doi: 10.1111/opo.12131 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Grieve AP (1984) Tests of sphericity of normal distributions and the analysis of repeated measures designs. Psychometrika 49(2):257–267. doi: 10.1007/bf02294176 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Saibene F, Minetti AE (2003) Biomechanical and physiological aspects of legged locomotion in humans. Eur J Appl Physiol 88(4–5):297–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Nagahara R, Matsubayashi T, Matsuo A, Zushi K (2014) Kinematics of transition during human accelerated sprinting. Biol Open 3(8):689–699. doi: 10.1242/bio.20148284 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Marino G (1983) Selected mechanical factors associated with acceleration in ice skating. Res Q Exerc Sport 54(3):234–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Owings TM, Grabiner MD (2004) Step width variability, but not step length variability or step time variability, discriminates gait of healthy young and older adults during treadmill locomotion. J Biomech 37(6):935–938. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2003.11.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Arellano CJ, Kram R (2011) The effects of step width and arm swing on energetic cost and lateral balance during running. J Biomech 44(7):1291–1295. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.01.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Pearsall D, Turcotte R, Lefebvre R, Bateni H, Nicolaou M, Montgomery D, Chang R (2001) Kinematics of the foot and ankle in forward ice hockey skating. In: ISBS-conference Proceedings archive, vol 1Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Stidwill T, Turcotte R, Dixon P, Pearsall D (2009) Force transducer system for measurement of ice hockey skating force. Sports Eng 12(2):63–68. doi: 10.1007/s12283-009-0033-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Bruening DA, Richards JG (2006) The effects of articulated figure skates on jump landing forces. J Appl Biomech 22(4):285CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Sports Engineering Association 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Philippe J. Renaud
    • 1
    Email author
  • Shawn M. K. Robbins
    • 2
  • Philippe C. Dixon
    • 1
    • 3
  • Jaymee R. Shell
    • 1
  • René A. Turcotte
    • 1
  • David J. Pearsall
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Kinesiology and Physical Education, McGill Research Centre for Physical Activity and HealthMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada
  2. 2.Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation, Constance Lethbridge Rehabilitation Centre and the School of Physical and Occupational TherapyMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada
  3. 3.Department of Engineering ScienceUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations