Sports Engineering

, Volume 17, Issue 4, pp 249–259 | Cite as

Comparison of algorithms to determine jump height and flight time from body mounted accelerometers

Technical Note

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate a new procedure of data processing from a body-mounted accelerometer to improve the assessment of vertical jump height. As the main difficulty when using an accelerometer is to detect the times of take-off and of landing, a new criterion was proposed to detect these times more accurately. Thirty physical education students participated in this study. They performed three squat jumps, three countermovement jumps with hands placed on the pelvis and three countermovement jumps with free arms (\(n = 270\) jumps). Flight time, vertical jump height and vertical velocity at take-off were collected from the accelerometer (the Myotest device and its specific software), the modified accelerometer (raw data of the Myotest and a specific treatment for the detection take-off and landing times) and a force platform, considered as the reference device. Concerning the flight time, systematic bias decreased from \(0.034 \pm 0.079\) s with the original accelerometer to \(-0.008 \pm 0.078\) s with the modified accelerometer. Regarding the vertical jump height, systematic bias decreased from \(4.8 \pm 9.4\) cm with the original accelerometer to \(-1.3 \pm 9.2\) cm with the modified accelerometer. Finally, the vertical velocity systematic bias was \(-0.12 \pm 0.28\) and \(-0.19 \pm 0.29\) m s\(^{-1}\) with the original accelerometer and the modified accelerometer, respectively. This study showed that the improvement proposed for the body-mounted accelerometer decreased the systematic bias, especially for the vertical jump height assessment, but not the random error.

Keywords

Myotest Force platform Vertical velocity Take-off Landing 

References

  1. 1.
    Mero A, Komi PV, Gregor RJ (1992) Biomechanics of sprint running. Sports Med 13:376–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Duthie G, Pyne D, Hooper S (2003) Applied physiology and game analysis of rugby union. Sports Med 33:973–991CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ebben WP, Carroll RM, Simenz CJ (2004) Strength and conditioning practices of national hockey league strength and conditioning coaches. J Strength Cond Res 18:889–897Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Stolen T, Chamari K, Castagna C, Wisloff U (2005) Physiology of soccer: an update. Sports Med 35:501–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ostojic S, Mazic S, Dikic N (2006) Profiling in basketball: physical and physiological characteristics of elite players. J Strength Cond Res 20:740–744Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ziv G, Lidor R (2010) Vertical jump in female and male basketball players, a review of observational and experimental studies. J Sci Med Sport 13:332–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sheppard J, Dingley A, Janssen I, Spratford W, Chapman DW, Newton R (2011) The effect of assisted jumping on vertical jump height in high-performance volleyball players. J Sci Med Sport 14:85–89Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Arsac LM, Belli A, Lacour J (1996) Muscle funciton during brief maximal exercise: accurate measurements on a friction-loaded cycle ergometer. Eur J Appl Physiol 74:100–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jakolska A, Goossens P, Veenstra B, Jakolski A, Skinner JS (1999) Comparison of treadmill and cycle ergometer measurements of force–velocity relationships and power outputs. Int J Sports Med 20:192–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rahmani A, Dalleau G, Viale F, Hautier CA, Lacour J (2000) Validity and reliability of a kinematic device for measuring the force developed during squatting. J Appl Biomech 16:26–35Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Samozino P, Morin JB, Hintzy F, Belli A (2008) A simple method for measuring force, velocity and power output during squat jump. J Biomech 41:2940–2945CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Maud P, Foster C (2006) Physiological assessment of human fitness. Human kinetetics.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Aragon-vargas L (1997) Kinesiological factors in vertical jump performance: differences among individuals. J Appl Biomech 13:24–44Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Glatthorn JF, Gouge S, Nussbaumer S, Stauffacher S, Impellizzeri FM, Maffiuletti NA (2011) Validity and reliability of optojump photoelectric cells for estimating vertical jump height. J Strength Cond Res 25(2):556–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nuzzo JL, Anning JH, Scharfenberg JM (2011) The reliability of three devices used for measuring vertical jump height. J Strength Cond Res 25(9):2580–2590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Casartelli N, Muller R, Maffiuletti NA (2010) Validity and reliability of the myotest accelerometric system for the assessment of vertical jump height. J Strength Cond Res 24(11):3186–3193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Castagna C, Ganzetti M, Ditroilo M, Giovannelli M, Rocchetti A, Manzi V (2013) Concurrent validity of vertical jump performance assessment systems. J Strength Cond Res 27(3):761–768CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bosquet L, Berryman N, Dupuy O (2009) A comparison of 2 optical timing systems designed to measure flight time and contact time during jumping and hopping. J Strength Cond Res 23:2660–2665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Petushek EJ, Van der Zanden T, Wurm B, Ebben WP (2010) Comparison of jump height values derived from a force platform and Vertec. In: International symposium on biomechanics in sports conference Pr, vol 28, p1Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Linthorne NP (2001) Analysis of standing vertical jumps using a force platform. Am J Phys 69(11):1198–2104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Musayev E (2006) Optoelectronic vertical jump height measuring method and device. Measurement 39(4):312–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bland J, Altman D (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 8:307–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tarlor JH (1999) An introduction to error analysis: the study of uncertainties in physical measurements. University Science Books, SausalitoGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavorial sciences, 2nd edn. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Cronin JB, Hing RD, McNair PJ (2004) Reliability and validity of a linear position transducer for measuring jump performance. J Strength Cond Res 18(3):590–593Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kibele A (1998) Possibilities and limitations in the biomechanical analysis of countermovement jumps: a methodological study. J Appl Biomech 14(1):105–117Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Sports Engineering Association 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tony Monnet
    • 1
  • Arnaud Decatoire
    • 1
  • Patrick Lacouture
    • 1
  1. 1.UPR 3346, Institut PprimeUniversité de Poitiers, CNRSFuturoscope CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations