The influence of equipment variations on sliotar–hurley impact in the Irish game of hurling

Abstract

The game of hurling is ranked as one of the fastest and most skilful field games in the world. It is played by a stick, hurley, made of ash wood and a ball, sliotar, made of a cork core or similar viscoelastic materials. Better standardisation of the game equipment requires analysing impacts to quantify precisely the effect of variations in equipment design on the resultant impact force at low and high striking speeds. Therefore, the purpose of the present study was to use a high-speed camera to (1) characterise the impact dynamics in term of impact force magnitude and duration, and (2) investigate whether a relationship exists between the game equipment and the magnitude of the impact force. An air cannon unit (ACU) test rig was set up to cause the sliotar to strike the hurley at predetermined speeds. A high-speed camera operating at 12,500 frames per second (fps) was used to capture 32 experimental impacts covering a range of sliotar and hurley brands, impact locations and impact speeds. The factor “sliotar brand” was identified as the most significant factor for the impact force among other main factors and two-factor interactions at a constant speed and it had a significant effect with up to 27 % difference between sliotar brands. It was demonstrated that, at higher impact speeds, the force–deformation curves of the sliotar brands varied significantly, even though similar force–deformation curves have been reported at quasi-static compression and similar COR values at low impact speeds using the standard free-drop test. This is the first known study to characterise the unique, highly non-linear and anisotropic sliotar–hurley impact using high-speed camera technology. It highlights the need for a tighter standard for sliotar materials and manufacturing to increase uniformity between different brands and strongly suggests that the standard free-drop test is not sufficient to characterise and compare game equipment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

References

  1. 1.

    Fahey G, Hassett L, Bradaigh C (1998) Mechanical analysis of equipment for the game of hurling. J Sports Eng 1:3–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Collins F, Brabazon D, Moran K (2010) The dynamic viscoelastic characterisation of the impact behaviour of the GAA sliotar. Proc Eng 2:2991–2997

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Gaelic Athletic Association (2008) Official guide part 1. http://www.gaa.ie. Accessed 10 January 2011

  4. 4.

    Cross R (1999) Impact of a ball with a bat or racket. Am J Phys 67(8):692–702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Nathan A (2000) Dynamics of the baseball–bat collision. Am J Phys 68(11):979–990

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Smith L, Shenoy M, Axtell J (2000) Simulated composite baseball bat impacts using numerical and experimental techniques. In Proceedings of the society of experimental mechanics, Orlando, FL, Society for Experimental Mechanics Inc., Bethal, pp 5–8

  7. 7.

    Shenoy M, Smith L, Axtell J (2001) Performance assessment of wood, metal and composite baseball bats. Compos Struct 52:397–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Nicholls R, Miller K, Elliott B (2006) Numerical analysis of maximal bat performance in baseball. J Biomech 39:1001–1009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Cheng N, Subic A, Takla M (2008) Development of a fast-solving numerical model for the structural analysis of cricket balls. Sport Technol 1(2–3):132–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Arakawa K, Mada T, Komatsu H, Shimizu T, Satou M, Takehara K, Etoh G (2009) Dynamic deformation behavior of a golf ball during normal impact. Exp Mech 49:471–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Alsakarneh A, Yigit AS, Cotterell M, Barrett J (2010) Nonlinear impact system identification using high speed camera. International Conference on Mechanical Engineering, Robotics and Aerospace, Bucharest, pp 200–205

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Koenig K, Mitchell N, Hannigan T, Clutter J (2004) The influence of moment of inertia on baseball/soft ball bat swing speed. J Sports Eng 7:105–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Cross R (2003) Oblique impact of a tennis ball on the strings of a tennis racket. J Sports Eng 6:235–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Montgomery DG (2005) Design and analysis of experiments. Wiley, New York. ISBN 978-0-471-48735-X

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Mr Ger Rasmussen for data collection and technical advice and the support of the CIT Department of Mechanical Engineering in making the air cannon unit and Instron mechanical tester freely available. The authors would like to acknowledge the funding from the Institutes of Technology of Ireland Strand 3 research programme in the Smart Systems Integration Group project.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amjad Alsakarneh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Alsakarneh, A., Bryan, K., Cotterell, M. et al. The influence of equipment variations on sliotar–hurley impact in the Irish game of hurling. Sports Eng 15, 177–188 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12283-012-0098-3

Download citation

Keywords

  • Analysis
  • High-speed camera
  • Hurling ball
  • Impact force
  • DoE