Abstract
Kinematic analysis is done by measurement of the position of bodies, followed by differentiation to get the accelerations of the centres of mass, and it is widely used in sport research. Another common approach is to measure the forces directly. Our intention here is to perform both a kinematic and a kinetic analysis of the same athlete-equipment system, in this case an athlete on a sliding kayak ergometer, with the aim of exploring the errors that may occur with each measurement type. The kayak ergometer with a sliding trolley, instrumented by seven uniaxial force sensors and two goniometers, was placed in a filming area. The instrumentation was validated in the direction of the anteroposterior axis using Newton’s second law. Ten athletes paddled at 92 strokes per minute, following a stationary phase. The comparison between the net force and the time-derivative of the linear momentum indicated a friction level of about 20 N between the trolley and the frame. Other errors came mainly from the inertial parameters of the trunk. A first analysis of contact forces shows a large inter-subject variability, in particular for the forces applied to the footrest and the seat.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ackland T, Ong K, Kerr D, Ridge B (2003) Morphological characteristics of olympic sprint canoe and kayak paddlers. J Sci Med Sport 6:285–294
Aitken D, Neal R (1992) An on-water analysis system for qualifying stroke force characteristics during kayak events. Int J Sport Biomech 8:165–173
Begon M, Colloud F (2007) A kayak ergometer using a sliding trolley to reproduce accurate on-water mechanical conditions. J Biomech 40(S2):S439
Begon M, Mancini G, Lacouture P, Durand F (2003) Comparison of kayak stroke kinematics on ergometer and in situ. Arch Physiol Biochem 111(S):16
Campagna P, Brien D, Holt L, Alexander A, Greenbgerger H (1982) A biomechanical comparison of olympic flatwater kayaking and a dry-land kayak ergometer. Can J Appl Sport Sci 7:242
Colloud F, Bahuaud P, Doriot N, Champely S, Cheze L (2006) Fixed versus free-floating stretcher mechanism in rowing ergometers: mechanical aspects. J Sports Sci 24(5):479–493
Elliot B, Lyttle A, Birkett O (2001) The rowperfect ergometer: a training aid for on-water single scull rowing. Sport Biomech 1:123–134
Hatze H (1980) A mathematical model for the computational determination of parameter values of anthropomorphic segments. J Biomech 13(10):833–843
Kendal S, Sanders R (1992) The technique of elite flatwater kayak paddlers using the wing paddle. Int J Sport Biomech 8:233–250
Kingma I, Toussaint H, De Looze M, Dieen J (1996) Segment inertial parameter evaluation in two anthropometric models by application of a dynamic linked segment model. J Biomech 29:693–704
Lamb DH (1989) A kinematic comparison of ergometer and on-water rowing. Am J Sports Med 17(3):367–373
Logan SM, Holt LE (1985) The flatwater kayak stroke. Natl Strength Cond Assoc J 7:4–11
Mann R, Kearney J (1980) A biomechanical analysis of the olympic-style flatwater kayak stroke. Med Sci Sport Exerc 12:183–188
Ong K, Ackland T, Hume P, Ridge B, Broad E, Kerr D (2005) Equipment set-up among olympic sprint and slalom kayak paddlers. Sports Biomech 4(1):47–58
Ong K, Elliot B, Ackland T, Lyttle A (2006) Performance tolerance and boat set-up in elite sprint kayaking. Sports Biomech 5(1):77–94
Petrone N, Quaresimin M, Spina S (1998) A load aquisition device for the paddling action on olympic kayak. In: Allison (ed) Experimental mechanics, advances in design, testing and analysis: proceedings of XI ICEM, vol 2, Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 817–822
Petrone N, Isotti A, Guerrini G (2006) Biomechanical analysis of olympic kayak athletes during indoor paddling. In: Proceedings of 6th international conference on the engineering of sport, Munich Technical University, 11–14 July 2006, vol 1. Springer, Heidelberg, pp. 413–418
Plagenhoef S, Gaynor Evans F, Abdelnour T (1983) Anatomical data for analysing human motion. Res Q Exerc Sport 54:169–178
Sanders R, Kendal S (1992a) A description of olympic flatwater kayak stroke technique. Aust J Sci Med Sport 24:25–30
Sanders R, Kendal S (1992b) Quantifying lift and drag forces in flatwater kayaking. In: Rodano R, Ferrigno G, Santambrogio GC (eds) Proceedings of the 10th international symposium on biomechanics in sport. Edi-Ermes, Milano
Szanto C (2004) Racing canoeing. International Canoe Federation, Switzerland
Winter D (1990) Biomechanics and motor control of human movement. 2nd edn, Wiley-Interscience, New York
Yeadon MR (1990) The simulation of aerial movement–ii. a mathematical inertia model of the human body. J Biomech 23(1):67–74
Acknowledgments
This study was support by a grant from the French Office of Youth and Sports. We thank those who participated in this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Begon, M., Colloud, F. & Lacouture, P. Measurement of contact forces on a kayak ergometer with a sliding footrest–seat complex. Sports Eng 11, 67–73 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12283-008-0011-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12283-008-0011-2