Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Centrally located breast carcinomas treated with central quadrantectomy and immediate nipple–areola reconstruction: a cohort study

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Mastectomy has often been cited as the favoured option for centrally located breast tumours because lumpectomies or quadrantectomies that remove the nipple–areola complex often result in poor cosmesis. Currently, breast-conserving treatment is a preferred treatment for centrally located breast tumours, but this approach requires oncoplastic breast technique to avoid aesthetic sequels. This article describes the use of breast reduction techniques with immediate nipple–areola complex reconstruction (utilised to treat breast cancer) for centrally sited breast tumours

Patients

Ten patients suffering from a centrally located breast carcinoma were treated at our breast unit over a period of 16 years (2006–2022). Oncologic and patient-reported outcomes were updated revising electronic reports and surveying with BREAST-Q module Breast conserving therapy (version 2, Spanish) postoperative scales.

Results

Excision margins were complete in all cases. There have been no postoperative complications, all patients are alive and no cases of recurrence after 84.8 months of mean follow-up. Patients score the domain satisfaction with breast: mean 61.7 (Standard deviation 12.5) out of 100.

Conclusions

Breast reduction mammaplasty with immediate nipple–areola complex reconstruction allows surgeons to carry out a central quadrantectomy to treat centrally located breast carcinoma with good oncologic and cosmetic outcome.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Data availability statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

References

  1. Zhang M, Wu K, Zhang P, Wang M, Bai F, Chen H. Breast-conserving surgery is oncologically safe for well-selected, centrally located breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021;28:330–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Yu T, Cheng W, Wang T, Chen Z, Ding Y, Feng J, Duan Y, Hu A, Li M, Zhang H, Li Y, Ma F, Guo B. Survival outcomes of breast-conserving therapy versus mastectomy in early-stage breast cancer, including centrally located breast cancer: A SEER-based study. Breast J. 2022;2022(27):5325556. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5325556.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Shen YF, Huang J, Zhou WB, Li JH, Xiao Z, Huang AJ, Liu XY, Hu YP, Li TX, Yang M, Cao AY. Breast-conserving in centrally located breast cancer patients confirmed safe by SEER based study. Gland Surg. 2022;11(1):226–35. https://doi.org/10.21037/gs-21-914.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Almahariq MF, Quinn TJ, Siddiqui Z, Jawad MS, Chen PY, Gustafson GS, et al. Breast conserving therapy is associated with improved overall survival compared to mastectomy in early-stage, lymph node-negative breast cancer. Radiother Oncol. 2020;142:186–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2019.09.018.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Acea B. Técnicas oncoplásticas para el manejo de tumores centrales de mama. Cir Esp. 2009;85(1):14–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Pasta V, D’Orazi V, Merola R, Frusone F, Amabile MI, De Luca A, Buè R, Monti M. Oncoplastic central quadrantectomies. Gland Surg. 2016;5(4):422–6. https://doi.org/10.21037/gs.2016.04.01.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Carrie K. Chu, Summer E. Hanson, Rosa F. Hwang, Liza C. Wu. Oncoplastic partial breast reconstruction: concepts and techniques. Gland Surg 2021;10(1):398–410. https://doi.org/10.21037/gs-20-380

  8. Pusic A, Klassen AF, Scott AM, Klot JA, Cordeiro PG, Cano SJ. Development of a new patient-reported outcome measure for breast surgery: the breast-Q. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;14:345–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fu W-D, Wang X-H, Lu K-K, Lu Y-Q, Zhou J-Y, Huang Q-D, Guo G-L. Real-world outcomes for Chinese breast cancer patients with tumor location of central and nipple portion. Front Surg. 2021;9:993263. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.993263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mc Culley SJ, Durani P, Macmillan RD. Therapeutic mammaplasty for centrally located breast tumors. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;117:366–73. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000200874.31320.c2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Schoeller T, Huemer GM. Immediate reconstruction of the nipple/areola complex in oncoplastic surgery after central quadrantectomy. Ann Plast Surg. 2006;57(6):611–5. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sap.0000235444.51056.31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wagner E, Schrenk P, Huemer GM, Sir A, Schreiner M, Wayand W. Central quadrantectomy with resection of the nipple-areola complex compared with mastectomy in patients with retroareolar breast cancer. Breast J. 2007;13(6):557–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4741.2007.00492.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Carty H, McCullough P, Aluwihare N, Matey P. Breast conserving surgery for breast cancer involving the nipple. The Breast. 2008;17:107–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2007.07.036.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hamdi M, Mariana C, De Baerdemaeker R, Kapila AK, Vanhoeij M, Giunta G, Zeltzer A. A new oncoplastic technique with immediate nipple reconstruction for central breast tumors using Würinger´s spetum-based flap. J Plastic Reconstruct Aesthetic Surg. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2022.08.005

  15. Hernanz F, Jimeno J, Muñoz P, et al. Patient-reported outcomes following breast-conserving treatment using BREAST-Q questionnaire. Eur J Plast Surg. 2020;43:353–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-019-01589-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Fernando H, Jaime J, Lucía P, Javier A, Erik G, Pedro M. Comparison of Conventional vs. Oncoplastic Breast Conserving Surgery in a Breast Unit with Oncoplastic Training. World J Surg Surgical Res. 2021; 4: 1317.

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors would like to thank all the women who participated in this study for their indispensable and uninterested collaboration.

Funding

No funding sources.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

FH, substantial contributions to the conception and design of the work; or the acquisition, analysis and interpretation of data for the work. Final approval of the version to be published. NG, the acquisition of data for the work. ME, the acquisition of data for the work. PM, analysis and interpretation of data for the work. Final approval of the version to be published.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hernanz Fernando.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Statement of ethics

This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Clinical Research Ethics Committee of Cantabria (Comité Ético de Investigación Clínica de Cantabria). The participants signed the informed consent form and completed the Breast Conserving Therapy Module Postoperative Scales (Spanish for the Spanish version).

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fernando, H., Noelia, G., Maria, E. et al. Centrally located breast carcinomas treated with central quadrantectomy and immediate nipple–areola reconstruction: a cohort study. Breast Cancer 30, 552–558 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-023-01445-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-023-01445-6

Keywords

Navigation