Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Dynamic changes in quality of life, psychological status, and body image in women who underwent a mastectomy as compared with breast reconstruction: an 8-year follow up

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Surgical decisions and methods of surgery highly influence long term QoL for breast cancer (BC) survivors. This study is aimed towards an exploration of the dynamic changes in quality of life (QoL), anxiety/depression status, and body image (BI) among women with BC who received a mastectomy compared with those receiving breast reconstruction (BR) within an 8-year follow-up period.

Methods

Women with major BC surgeries were invited to complete the World Health Organization Quality of Life–Brief (WHOQOL-BREF), the European quality of life five dimensions questionnaire (EQ-5D), and a body image scale within 8 years of surgery. Kernel smoothing methods were applied to describe dynamic changes in QoL, anxiety/depression, and BI at different time points. Linear mixed effects models were constructed to identify the interaction between time, different types of surgery, and the determinants of QoL in these patients.

Results

After 1:10 propensity score matching, a total of 741 women who had undergone a BR and mastectomy were included. The BR group exhibited a high WHOQOL QoL score one to five years after surgery with some fluctuations. The mastectomy group had comparatively stable QoL scores on WHOQOL items and were less depressed/anxious. The BR group generally showed fluctuating, higher BI scores two years after surgery, but they exhibited more anxiety/depression during follow up for 8 years. Medical comorbidities, the status of anxiety/depression, and BI were the major factors influencing all domains and items of the WHOQOL BREF among women with BC.

Conclusion

The mastectomy group showed a decreased trend toward depression in patients with BC. The BR group showed a significant improvement in QoL in the first 5 years with massive fluctuations. These findings should be considered and discussed in patient participatory decision-making and promotion of QoL for breast cancer survivors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The database data used and analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due to confidentiality and regulations regarding personal electronic data protection but are available from the corresponding author after approval from the IRB of the National Cheng Kung University Hospital.

References

  1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clinicians. 2021;71:209–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lei S, Zheng R, Zhang S, Wang S, Chen R, Sun K, et al. Global patterns of breast cancer incidence and mortality: a population-based cancer registry data analysis from 2000 to 2020. Cancer Commun. 2021;41:1183–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Society AC. Breast cancer facts & figures 2019–2020. Am Cancer Soc. 2019; 1–44.

  4. Wu T-Y, Chang T-W, Chang S-M, Lin Y-Y, Wang J-D, Kuo Y-L. Dynamic changes of body image and quality of life in breast cancer patients. Cancer Manag Res. 2019;11:10563.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Wu TY, Chung CH, Lin CN, Hwang JS, Wang JD. Lifetime risks, loss of life expectancy, and health care expenditures for 19 types of cancer in Taiwan. Clin Epidemiol. 2018;10:581–91.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Gradishar WJ, Anderson BO, Balassanian R, Blair SL, Burstein HJ, Cyr A, et al. Breast cancer, version 4.2017, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw. 2018;16:310–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Miller AM, Steiner CA, Barrett ML, Fingar KR, Elixhauser A. Breast reconstruction surgery for mastectomy in hospital inpatient and ambulatory settings, 2009–2014: statistical brief# 228. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) Statistical Briefs (Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US)). 2017: 1–28.

  8. Bland KI, Chang HR, Copeland EM III. Modified radical mastectomy and simple mastectomy. In: The breast. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2018. p. 443- 61.e3.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Doherty C, Pearce S, Baxter N, Knowles S, Ross D, McClure JA, et al. Trends in immediate breast reconstruction and radiation after mastectomy: a population study. Breast J. 2020;26:446–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Politi MC, Lee CN, Philpott-Streiff SE, Foraker RE, Olsen MA, Merrill C, et al. A randomized controlled trial evaluating the BREASTChoice tool for personalized decision support about breast reconstruction after mastectomy. Ann Surg. 2020;271:230–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Honkanen N, Mustonen L, Kalso E, Meretoja T, Harno H. Breast reconstruction after breast cancer surgery—persistent pain and quality of life 1–8 years after breast reconstruction. Scand J Pain. 2021;21:522–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chetrit A, Ben-Avraham S, Mandelzweig L, Amitai T, Danieli NS, Silverman B, et al. Breast cancer survivors: physical and mental quality of life 10 years following diagnosis, a case-control study. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-021-06156-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Chen W-L, Chen Y-Y, Wu W-T, Ho C-L, Wang C-C. Life expectancy estimations and determinants of return to work among cancer survivors over a 7-year period. Sci Rep. 2021;11:1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gonzalez L, Bardach A, Palacios A, Peckaitis C, Ciapponi A, Pichón-Riviere A, et al. Health-related quality of life in patients with breast cancer in Latin America and the Caribbean: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Oncologist. 2021;26:e794–806.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Marinkovic M, Djordjevic N, Djordjevic L, Ignjatovic N, Djordjevic M, Karanikolic V. Assessment of the quality of life in breast cancer depending on the surgical treatment. Support Care Cancer. 2021;29:3257–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mazo C, Kearns C, Mooney C, Gallagher WM. Clinical decision support systems in breast cancer: a systematic review. Cancers. 2020;12:369.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Dauplat J, Kwiatkowski F, Rouanet P, Delay E, Clough K, Verhaeghe J, et al. Quality of life after mastectomy with or without immediate breast reconstruction. J Br Surg. 2017;104:1197–206.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Thorarinsson A, Fröjd V, Kölby L, Ljungdal J, Taft C, Mark H. Long-term health-related quality of life after breast reconstruction: comparing 4 different methods of reconstruction. Plast Reconstruct Surg Glob Open. 2017;5:e1316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Słowik AJ, Jabłoński MJ, Michałowska-Kaczmarczyk AM, Jach R. Evaluation of quality of life in women with breast cancer, with particular emphasis on sexual satisfaction, future perspectives and body image, depending on the method of surgery. Psychiatr Pol. 2017;51:871–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Campbell-Enns HJ, Woodgate RL. The psychosocial experiences of women with breast cancer across the lifespan: a systematic review. Psychooncology. 2017;26:1711–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Maguire G, Lee E, Bevington D, Küchemann C, Crabtree R, Cornell C. Psychiatric problems in the first year after mastectomy. Br Med J. 1978;1:963–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Fanakidou I, Zyga S, Alikari V, Tsironi M, Stathoulis J, Theofilou P. Mental health, loneliness, and illness perception outcomes in quality of life among young breast cancer patients after mastectomy: the role of breast reconstruction. Qual Life Res. 2018;27:539–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhang Q, Zhao H, Zheng Y. Effectiveness of mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) on symptom variables and health-related quality of life in breast cancer patients—a systematic review and meta-analysis. Support Care Cancer. 2019;27:771–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Moshina N, Falk R, Hofvind S. Long-term quality of life among breast cancer survivors eligible for screening at diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Public Health. 2021;199:65–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Domenici L, Caputo GG, Losco L, Di Taranto G, Lo Torto F, Pierazzi DM, et al. Muscle-sparing skin-reducing breast reconstruction with pre-pectoral implants in breast cancer patients: long-term assessment of patients’ satisfaction and quality of life. J Investig Surg. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941939.2021.1923874.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Archangelo SDCV, Sabino Neto M, Veiga DF, Garcia EB, Ferreira LM. Sexuality, depression and body image after breast reconstruction. Clinics. 2019;74:883.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Eltahir Y, Werners LL, Dreise MM, van Emmichoven IAZ, Jansen L, Werker PM, et al. Quality-of-life outcomes between mastectomy alone and breast reconstruction: comparison of patient-reported BREAST-Q and other health-related quality-of-life measures. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;132:201e-e209.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Fang S-Y, Chang H-T, Shu B-C. Objectified body consciousness, body image discomfort, and depressive symptoms among breast cancer survivors in Taiwan. Psychol Women Q. 2014;38:563–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Padmalatha S, Tsai Y-T, Ku H-C, Wu Y-L, Yu T, Fang S-Y, et al. Higher risk of depression after total mastectomy versus breast reconstruction among adult women with breast cancer: a systematic review and metaregression. Clin Breast Cancer. 2021;21:e526–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ho PJ, Gernaat SA, Hartman M, Verkooijen HM. Health-related quality of life in Asian patients with breast cancer: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2018;8: e020512.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Yang S-C, Kuo C-W, Lai W-W, Lin C-C, Su W-C, Chang S-M, et al. Dynamic changes of health utility in lung cancer patients receiving different treatments: a 7-year follow-up. J Thorac Oncol. 2019;14:1892–900.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Kao Y-L, Ou C-H, Lin S-H, Chang S-M, Wang J-D, Tsai Y-S. Dynamic changes of generic quality of life after different treatments for localized prostate cancer. J Clin Med. 2021;10:158.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Pirnia B, Homayounfar N, Hosseini N, Ebrahimi F, Haj Sadeghi Z, Malekanmehr P. The predictive role of body image and sexual function in quality of life after modified radical mastectomy regarding the mediating role of emotion; a cross sectional study. Int J Cancer Manag. 2020. https://doi.org/10.5812/ijcm.101371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Group W. Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment. Psychol Med. 1998;28:551–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Group W. The World Health Organization quality of life assessment (WHOQOL): position paper from the World Health Organization. Soc Sci Med. 1995;41:1403–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Yao G, Chung C-W, Yu C-F, Wang J-D. Development and verification of validity and reliability of the WHOQOL-BREF Taiwan version. J Formos Med Assoc. 2002;101:342–51.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Lin C-Y, Hwang J-S, Wang W-C, Lai W-W, Su W-C, Wu T-Y, et al. Psychometric evaluation of the WHOQOL-BREF, Taiwan version, across five kinds of Taiwanese cancer survivors: Rasch analysis and confirmatory factor analysis. J Formos Med Assoc. 2019;118:215–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Yao G, Wu C-H. Factorial invariance of the WHOQOL-BREF among disease groups. Qual Life Res. 2005;14:1881–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Hwang J-S, Wang J-D. Integrating health profile with survival for quality of life assessment. Qual Life Res. 2004;13:1–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Pickard AS, Ray S, Ganguli A, Cella D. Comparison of FACT- and EQ-5D-based utility scores in cancer. Value in Health. 2012;15:305–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Tachi T, Teramachi H, Tanaka K, Asano S, Osawa T, Kawashima A, et al. The impact of outpatient chemotherapy-related adverse events on the quality of life of breast cancer patients. PLoS One. 2015;10: e0124169.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Lee H-Y, Hung M-C, Hu F-C, Chang Y-Y, Hsieh C-L, Wang J-D. Estimating quality weights for EQ-5D (EuroQol-5 dimensions) health states with the time trade-off method in Taiwan. J Formos Med Assoc. 2013;112:699–706.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Claessens AK, Ramaekers BL, Lobbezoo DJ, van Kampen RJ, de Boer M, van de Wouw AJ, et al. Quality of life in a real-world cohort of advanced breast cancer patients: a study of the SONABRE Registry. Qual Life Res. 2020;29:3363–74.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Hopwood P, Fletcher I, Lee A, Al GS. A body image scale for use with cancer patients. Eur J Cancer. 2001;37:189–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Spatuzzi R, Vespa A, Lorenzi P, Miccinesi G, Ricciuti M, Cifarelli W, et al. Evaluation of social support, quality of life, and body image in women with breast cancer. Breast Care. 2016;11:28–32.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Yang S-C, Lin C-C, Lai W-W, Chang S-M, Hwang J-S, Su W-C, et al. Dynamic changes in quality of life after three first-line therapies for EGFR mutation-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2018;10:1758834018755072.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Ahern TP, Lash TL, Thwin SS, Silliman RA. Impact of acquired comorbidities on all-cause mortality rates among older breast cancer survivors. Med Care. 2009;47:73.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Moradzadeh R, Mansournia MA, Baghfalaki T, Ghiasvand R, Noori-Daloii MR, Holakouie-Naieni K. Misclassification adjustment of family history of breast cancer in a case-control study: a Bayesian approach. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2016;16:8221–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Li R, Daniel R, Rachet B. How much do tumor stage and treatment explain socioeconomic inequalities in breast cancer survival? Applying causal mediation analysis to population-based data. Eur J Epidemiol. 2016;31:603–11.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Miller AM, Steiner CA, Barrett ML, Fingar KR, Elixhauser A. Breast reconstruction surgery for mastectomy in hospital inpatient and ambulatory settings, 2009–2014: statistical brief# 228. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) Statistical Briefs (Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US)). 2017: 1–28

  51. Siegel EL, Whiting J, Kim Y, Sun W, Laronga C, Lee MC. Effect of surgical complications on outcomes in breast cancer patients treated with mastectomy and immediate reconstruction. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2021;188:641–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Riggio AI, Varley KE, Welm AL. The lingering mysteries of metastatic recurrence in breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 2021;124:13–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Trayes KP, Cokenakes SE. Breast cancer treatment. Am Fam Physician. 2021;104:171–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Lavdaniti M, Owens DA, Liamopoulou P, Marmara K, Zioga E, Mantzanas MS, et al. Factors influencing quality of life in breast cancer patients six months after the completion of chemotherapy. Diseases. 2019;7:26.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Tsai HY, Kuo RNC, Chung KP. Quality of life of breast cancer survivors following breast-conserving therapy versus mastectomy: a multicenter study in Taiwan. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2017;47:909–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Huang C-C, Lien H-H, Tu S-H, Huang C-S, Jeng J-Y, Chao H-L, et al. Quality of life in Taiwanese breast cancer survivors with breast-conserving therapy. J Formos Med Assoc. 2010;109:493–502.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Hung YN, Liu TW, Wen FH, Chou WC, Tang ST. Escalating health care expenditures in cancer decedents’ last year of life: a decade of evidence from a retrospective population-based cohort study in Taiwan. Oncologist. 2017;22:460.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Siegel EL, Whiting J, Kim Y, Sun W, Laronga C, Lee MC. Effect of surgical complications on outcomes in breast cancer patients treated with mastectomy and immediate reconstruction. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2021;188:1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Gangane N, Khairkar P, Hurtig A-K, San SM. Quality of life determinants in breast cancer patients in central rural India. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev APJCP. 2017;18:3325.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Coombes RC, Tovey H, Kilburn L, Mansi J, Palmieri C, Bartlett J, et al. Effect of celecoxib vs placebo as adjuvant therapy on disease-free survival among patients with breast cancer: the REACT randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2021;7:1291–301.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. de Boniface J, Szulkin R, Johansson AL. Survival after breast conservation vs mastectomy adjusted for comorbidity and socioeconomic status: a swedish national 6-year follow-up of 48 986 women. JAMA Surg. 2021;56:69.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Howard-Anderson J, Ganz PA, Bower JE, Stanton AL. Quality of life, fertility concerns, and behavioral health outcomes in younger breast cancer survivors: a systematic review. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2012;104:386–405.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Siqueira HFF, de Almeida Teixeira JL, da Silva Lessa Filho R, Hora EC, Brasileiro FF, de Souza Borges K, et al. Patient satisfaction and quality of life in breast reconstruction: assessment of outcomes of immediate, delayed, and nonreconstruction. BMC Res Notes. 2020;13:1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Hojan K. Does the weight of an external breast prosthesis play an important role for women who undergone mastectomy? Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2020;25:574–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Qiu J, Hou S, Li P, Huang L. Medical professionals’ knowledge of the use of external breast prostheses among breast cancer patients in China—a cross-sectional study. Gland Surg. 2021;10:595.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Anishya A, Appavu S. External breast prosthesis for post mastectomy women. Asian J Nurs Educ Res. 2021;11:427–30.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Taghian NR, Miller CL, Jammallo LS, O’Toole J, Skolny MN. Lymphedema following breast cancer treatment and impact on quality of life: a review. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2014;92:227–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Jørgensen MG, Toyserkani NM, Hansen FG, Bygum A, Sørensen JA. The impact of lymphedema on health-related quality of life up to 10 years after breast cancer treatment. NPJ Breast Cancer. 2021;7:1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Togawa K, Ma H, Smith AW, Neuhouser ML, George SM, Baumgartner KB, et al. Self-reported symptoms of arm lymphedema and health-related quality of life among female breast cancer survivors. Sci Rep. 2021;11:1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. El Haidari R, Abbas LA, Nerich V, Anota A. Factors associated with health-related quality of life in women with breast cancer in the Middle East: a systematic review. Cancers. 2020;12:696.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Zhou K, Wang W, Li M, An J, Huo L, He X, et al. Body image mediates the relationship between post-surgery needs and health-related quality of life among women with breast cancer: a cross-sectional study. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020;18:1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Okati-Aliabad H, Ansari-Moghadam A, Mohammadi M, Kargar S, Shahraki-Sanavi F. The prevalence of anxiety and depression and its association with coping strategies, supportive care needs, and social support among women with breast cancer. Suppor Care Cancer. 2021;30:1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Park J, Rodriguez JL, O’Brien KM, Nichols HB, Hodgson ME, Weinberg CR, et al. Health-related quality of life outcomes among breast cancer survivors. Cancer. 2021;127:1114–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Lu I-C, Jean M-CY, Lei S-M, Cheng H-H, Wang J-D. BSRS-5 (5-tem Brief Symptom Rating Scale) scores affect every aspect of quality of life measured by WHOQOL-BREF in healthy workers. Qual Life Res. 2011;20:1469–75.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. Chang Y-C, Yao G, Hu SC, Wang J-D. Depression affects the scores of all facets of the WHOQOL-BREF and may mediate the effects of physical disability among community-dwelling older adults. PLoS One. 2015;10: e0128356.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. Marsh S, Borges VF, Coons HL, Afghahi A. Sexual health after a breast cancer diagnosis in young women: clinical implications for patients and providers. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020;184:1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Franzoi MA, Agostinetto E, Perachino M, Del Mastro L, de Azambuja E, Vaz-Luis I, et al. Evidence-based approaches for the management of side-effects of adjuvant endocrine therapy in patients with breast cancer. Lancet Oncol. 2021;22:e303–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Colomo N, Olveira C, Hernández-Pedrosa J, Bergero T, Fábrega-Ruz J, Porras N, et al. Validity of self-rating screening scales for the diagnosis of depression and anxiety in adult patients with bronchiectasis. Archivos de Bronconeumología (English Edition). 2021;57:179–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I am especially indebted to the National Cheng Kung university to support funding for my studies. Also, I wish to express my appreciation for those who had helped with the English editing of the manuscript.

Funding

The collection of patient’s reported outcome data was supported by serial grants from the Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST 108-2627-M-006-001, MOST 109-2621-M-006-007, MOST 110-2627-M-006-010). The funder had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization: SPKM, N-YK, J-DW, S-YF; methodology: SPKM, N-YK, J-DW, S-YF; formal analysis and investigation: SPKm, SK, Y-LW, CCC, C-NL. Writing—original draft preparation: SPKM; writing—review and editing: H-CK, Y-TT, SK, N-YKJ-DW, S-YF; funding acquisition: SPKM, N-YK, J-DW; resources: SPKM, N-YK; supervision: N-YK, J-DW, S-YF.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nai-Ying Ko.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

This study was approved by The Institutional Review Board of the National Cheng Kung University Hospital before initiation (review No: B-ER-110–050).

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from every patient before adding the data to the database.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 81 kb)

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Konara Mudiyanselage, S.P., Wu, YL., Kukreti, S. et al. Dynamic changes in quality of life, psychological status, and body image in women who underwent a mastectomy as compared with breast reconstruction: an 8-year follow up. Breast Cancer 30, 226–240 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-022-01413-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-022-01413-6

Keywords

Navigation