Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Sentinel lymph node biopsy after introducing Twirl® breast markers into suspicious lymph nodes in breast cancer patients

  • Rapid Communication
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ten stage I/II breast cancer patients with one or two suspicious lymph nodes (LNs) detected on ultrasonography underwent sentinel LN biopsy (SLNB) after the introduction of Twirl® breast markers into each suspicious LN revealed that each Twirl®-marked LN was SLN and was likely the first SLN. Three patients had less than three SLN metastases and were candidates for sparing completion axillary lymph node dissection (cALND). Indeed, of them, one underwent breast-conserving surgery without cALND and the other two underwent total mastectomy with cALND. These results suggest that, as all suspicious LNs are SLNs, patients can be treated with SLNB alone if they fulfill the ACOSOG Z-0011 criteria, despite suspicious LNs yielding positive results on preoperative fine-needle aspiration cytology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. Lyman GH, Somerfield MR, Bosserman LD, Perkins CL, Weaver DL, Giuliano AE. Sentinel lymph node biopsy for patients with early-stage breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Update. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35:561–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Galimberti V, Cole BF, Viale G, Veronesi P, Vicini E, Intra M, et al. Axillary dissection versus no axillary dissection in patients with breast cancer and sentinel-node micrometastases (IBCSG 23–01): 10-year follow-up of a randomised, controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19:1385–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Giuliano AE, Ballman KV, McCall L, Beitsch PD, Brennan MB, Kelemen PR, et al. Effect of axillary dissection vs no axillary dissection on 10-year overall survival among women with invasive breast cancer and sentinel node metastasis: the ACOSOG Z0011 (Alliance) randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2017;318:918–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines®). Breast Cancer Version 4, 2020:https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx. Accessed 30 June 2020.

  5. Gipponi M, Fregatti P, Garlaschi A, Murelli F, Margarino C, Depaoli F, et al. Axillary ultrasound and fine-needle aspiration cytology in the preoperative staging of axillary node metastasis in breast cancer patients. Breast. 2016;30:146–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kane G, Fleming C, Heneghan H, McCartan D, James P, Trueick R, et al. False-negative rate of ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology for identifying axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer patients. Breast J. 2019;25:848–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhang F, Zhang J, Meng QX, Zhang X. Ultrasound combined with fine needle aspiration cytology for the assessment of axillary lymph nodes in patients with early stage breast cancer. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018;97:e9855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Alvarez S, Anorbe E, Alcorta P, Lopez F, Alonso I, Cortes J. Role of sonography in the diagnosis of axillary lymph node metastases in breast cancer: a systematic review. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;186:1342–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Miyake T, Shimazu K, Tanei T, Naoi Y, Kagara N, Shimoda M, et al. Hookwire-guided sentinel lymph node biopsy using contrast-enhanced ultrasonography followed by a one-step nucleic acid amplification (OSNA) assay for breast cancer. Anticancer Res. 2019;39:6183–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Tamaki Y, Sato N, Homma K, Takabatake D, Nishimura R, Tsujimoto M, et al. Routine clinical use of the one-step nucleic acid amplification assay for detection of sentinel lymph node metastases in breast cancer patients: results of a multicenter study in Japan. Cancer. 2012;118:3477–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Akimitsu Miyake of the Data Coordinating Center at Osaka University Hospital for statistical advice in the peer review process and Hiroki Shoji of the Laboratory for Clinical Investigation at Osaka University Hospital for performing the OSNA diagnostic assay.

Funding

The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Data collection and analysis were performed by TM, MS, TT, NK, YN and SN. The first draft of the manuscript was written by TM and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tomohiro Miyake.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Naoi Y. has received research funding not related to this study from Sysmex as well as holds joint patents not related to this study with Sysmex; Shimazu K. has received honoraria not related to this study from Sysmex; Noguchi S. is an advisory for and has received honoraria and research funding not related to this study from Sysmex as well as holds joint patents not related to this study with Sysmex; The other authors do not declare any conflict of interest related to this study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Miyake, T., Shimoda, M., Tanei, T. et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy after introducing Twirl® breast markers into suspicious lymph nodes in breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer 28, 772–775 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-020-01195-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-020-01195-9

Keywords

Navigation