Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Oncologic outcomes and technical considerations of nipple-sparing mastectomies in breast cancer: experience of 425 cases from a single institution

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) is an advantageous treatment option, providing a complete cure and good cosmetic results. We tested whether NSM is a surgically and oncologically safe technique.

Methods

We evaluated the oncological outcome of 425 breasts in 413 patients who underwent NSM between January 2000 and March 2013. We retrospectively reviewed patient data and analyzed all patient characteristics as potential risk factors of recurrence at the nipple–areola complex (NAC). To confirm the oncological safety of NSM, we compared outcomes of NSM and conventional total mastectomy.

Results

The median follow-up time after surgery was 46.8 months (range 6–158 months). Nipple necrosis was observed in 6 cases (1.4 %). The cumulative local recurrence rate after NSM was 5.8 % (25/425 cases), similar to that of conventional total mastectomy in the same period (5.6 %, 49/878 cases). Furthermore, the cumulative local recurrence rate at the NAC was 2.3 % (10 cases). HER2-enriched tumors and young age (<40 years) were significant risk factors for recurrence at the NAC. In patients with recurrence, the site of recurrence was easily excised, and good cosmetic results were achieved in breast reconstruction cases.

Conclusion

NSM is safe with a low complication rate. No significant difference was observed in cumulative local recurrence rate, cumulative distant disease recurrence rate, and overall survival between patients who underwent NSM or conventional total mastectomy, confirming that NSM was surgically and oncologically safe.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cristiano B, James Y, Carlos S, et al. Oncologic safety of nipple skin-sparing or total skin-sparing mastectomies with immediate reconstruction. J Am Coll Surg. 2011;212(4):686–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gerber B, Krause A, Dieterich M, et al. The oncological safety of skin sparing mastectomy with conservation of the nipple–areola complex and autologous reconstruction: an extended follow-up study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;249:461–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gerber B, Krause A, Reimer T, et al. Skin-sparing mastectomy with conservation of the nipple-areola complex and autologous reconstruction is an oncologically safe procedure. Ann Surg Oncol. 2003;238(1):120–7.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kinoshita S, Nojima K, Takeishi M, et al. Retrospective comparison of non-skin-sparing mastectomy and skin-sparing mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction. Int J Surg Oncol. 2011;2011:876520.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Sakurai T, Zhang N, Suzuma T, et al. Long-term follow-up of nipple-sparing mastectomy without radiotherapy: a single center study at a Japanese institution. Med Oncol. 2013;30(1):481.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wagner JL, Fearmonti R, Hunt KK, et al. Prospective evaluation of the nipple-areola complex sparing mastectomy for risk reduction and for early-stage breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19(4):1137–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Caruso F, Ferrara M, Castiglione G, et al. Nipple sparing subcutaneous mastectomy: sixty-six months follow-up. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2006;32(9):937–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gould DJ, Hunt KK, Liu J, et al. Impact of surgical techniques, biomaterials, and patient variables on rate of nipple necrosis after nipple-sparing mastectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;132(3):330e–8e.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Stolier AJ, Sullivan SK, Dellacroce FJ. Technical considerations in nipple-sparing mastectomy: 82 consecutive cases without necrosis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15(5):1341–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Algaithy ZK, Petit JY, Lohsiriwat V, et al. Nipple sparing mastectomy: can we predict the factors predisposing to necrosis? Eur J Surg Oncol. 2012;38(2):125–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Munhoz AM, Aldrighi CM, Montag E, et al. Clinical outcomes following nipple-areola-sparing mastectomy with immediate implant-based breast reconstruction: a 12-year experience with an analysis of patient and breast-related factors for complications. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013;140(3):545–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lohsiriwat V, Rotmensz N, Botteri E, et al. Do clinicopathological features of the cancer patient relate with nipple areolar complex necrosis in nipple-sparing mastectomy? Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20(3):990–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Crowe JP Jr, Kim JA, Yetman R, et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy: technique and results of 54 procedures. Arch Surg. 2004;139(2):148–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Stolier AJ, Levine EA. Reducing the risk of nipple necrosis: technical observations in 340 nipple-sparing mastectomies. Breast J. 2013;19(2):173–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Benediktsson KP, Perbeck L. Survival in breast cancer after nipple-sparing subcutaneous mastectomy and immediate reconstruction with implants: a prospective trial with 13 years median follow-up in 216 patients. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2008;34(2):143–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Munhoz AM, Aldrighi C, Montag E, et al. Optimizing the nipple-areola sparing mastectomy with double concentric periareolar incision and biodimensional expander-implant reconstruction: aesthetic and technical refinements. Breast. 2009;18(6):356–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Brachtel EF, Rusby JE, James S, et al. Occult nipple involvement in breast cancer: clinicopathologic findings in 316 consecutive mastectomy specimens. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(30):4948–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Vlajcic Z, Zic R, Stanec S, et al. Nipple-areola complex preservation: predictive factors of neoplastic nipple-areola complex invasion. Ann Plast Surg. 2005;55(3):240–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Billar JA, Dueck AC, Gray RJ, et al. Preoperative predictors of nipple–areola complex involvement for patients undergoing mastectomy for breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18:3123–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Mallon P, Feron JG, Couturaud B, et al. The role of nipple-sparing mastectomy in breast cancer: a comprehensive review of the literature. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;131(5):969–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Cense HA, Rutgers EJ, Lopes Cardozo M, et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy in breast cancer: a viable option? Eur J Surg Oncol. 2001;27(6):521–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lagois MD, Gates EA, Westdahl PR, et al. A guide to the frequency of nipple involvement in breast cancer. A study of 149 consecutive mastectomies using a serial subgross and correlated radiographic technique. Am J Surg. 1979;138:135–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Morimoto T, Komaki K, Inui K, et al. Involvement of nipple and areola in early breast cancer. Cancer. 1985;55(10):2459–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lüttges J, Kalbfleisch H, Prinz P. Nipple involvement and multicentricity in breast cancer. A study on whole organ sections. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 1987;113(5):481–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Wertheim U, Ozzello L. Neoplastic involvement of nipple and skin flap in carcinoma of the breast. Am J Surg Pathol. 1980;4(6):543–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Santini D, Taffurelli M, Gelli MC, et al. Neoplastic involvement of nipple-areolar complex in invasive breast cancer. Am J Surg. 1989;158(5):399–403.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Lohsiriwat V, Martella S, Rietjens M, et al. Paget’s disease as a local recurrence after nipple-sparing mastectomy: clinical presentation, treatment, outcome, and risk factor analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19(6):1850–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Petit JY, Veronesi U, Orecchia R, et al. Risk factors associated with recurrence after nipple-sparing mastectomy for invasive and intraepithelial neoplasia. Ann Oncol. 2012;23(8):2053–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Margulies AG, Hochberg J, Kepple J, et al. Total skin-sparing mastectomy without preservation of the nipple–areolar complex. Am J Surg. 2005;190:907–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Petit JY, Veronesi U, Orecchia R, et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy in association with intra operative radiotherapy (ELIOT): a new type of mastectomy for breast cancer treatment. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2006;96:47–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Sacchini V, Pinotti JA, Barros A, et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy for breast cancer and risk reduction: oncologic or technical problem? J Am Coll Surg. 2006;203:704–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Crowe JP Jr, Patrick RJ, Yetman RJ, Djohan R. Nipple-sparing mastectomy update: one hundred forty-nine procedures and clinical outcomes. Arch Surg. 2008;143:1106–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Voltura AM, Tsangaris TN, Rosson GD, et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy: critical assessment of 51 procedures and implications for selection criteria. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:3396–401.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Babiera G, Simmons R. Nipple-areolar complex-sparing mastectomy: feasibility, patient selection, and technique. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17(Suppl 3):245–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Harness JK, Vetter TS, Salibian AH. Areola and nipple–areola-sparing mastectomy for breast cancer treatment and risk reduction: report of an initial experience in a community hospital setting. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18(4):917–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Jensen JA, Orringer JS, Giuliano AE. Nipple-sparing mastectomy in 99 patients with a mean follow-up of 5 years. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18:1665–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, 2-16-1 Sugao, Miyamae-ku, Kawasaki-Shi, Kanagawa, 216-8511, Japan

    Ayaka Shimo, Koichiro Tsugawa, Seiko Tsuchiya, Reiko Yoshie, Kyoko Tsuchiya, Tomoko Uejima, Yasuyuki Kojima, Arata Shimo, Ryosuke Hayami, Toru Nishikawa, Yukari Yabuki & Hisanori Kawamoto

  2. Breast and Imaging Center, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan

    Hisanori Kawamoto, Akihiko Sudo & Mamoru Fukuda

  3. Department of Radiology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan

    Yoshihide Kanemaki

  4. Department of Pathology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan

    Ichiro Maeda

Authors
  1. Ayaka Shimo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Koichiro Tsugawa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Seiko Tsuchiya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Reiko Yoshie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Kyoko Tsuchiya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Tomoko Uejima
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Yasuyuki Kojima
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Arata Shimo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Ryosuke Hayami
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Toru Nishikawa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Yukari Yabuki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Hisanori Kawamoto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Akihiko Sudo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Mamoru Fukuda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Yoshihide Kanemaki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Ichiro Maeda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ayaka Shimo.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shimo, A., Tsugawa, K., Tsuchiya, S. et al. Oncologic outcomes and technical considerations of nipple-sparing mastectomies in breast cancer: experience of 425 cases from a single institution. Breast Cancer 23, 851–860 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-015-0651-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-015-0651-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation