Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Implementation of a risk assessment program in a breast-imaging community practice

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

To review the initial results of the implementation of a risk assessment program in our outpatient community-based breast-imaging practice.

Methods

From May 1, 2011 through November 4, 2013 a total of 96,389 patients presented to our facility. Each patient was required to complete a health history form. 24,850 (25.7 %) were flagged through our radiology information system (RIS) as potentially being at increased risk for breast cancer per responses on the health history form. Patient flagging was based on a system we developed. Letters were generated informing flagged patients and her physician that the patient could be a candidate for further breast cancer risk assessment. Genetic testing performed was primarily for BRCA1/BRCA2; testing for other mutations was offered based on personal and family history of the patient.

Results

1,088 genetic counseling appointments occurred during the time frame from the 24,850 patients flagged, leading to 887 genetic tests performed. Forty-three mutations were detected: 21 BRCA1, 19 BRCA2, 1 MLH1, 1 MSH6 and 1 CHEK2. There were 717 negative tests, 20 variants of unknown significance; the remaining cases were cancelled. 464 high-risk MRIs were performed after the patient was referred from the program, from which 52 biopsies were performed due to a finding on MRI revealing 14 malignancies.

Conclusions

In our experience after implementation of a risk assessment program, 24,850 potential at-risk patients have been flagged, revealing 40 BRCA 1 or 2 mutations. Screening with breast MRI provided to at-risk patients revealed 14 cancers diagnosed that may have otherwise been undetected.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. US Preventive Services Task Force. Genetic risk assessment and BRCA mutation testing for breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility: recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2005;143:355–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hall IJ, Middlebrooks A, Coughlin SS. Population prevalence of first-degree family history of breast and ovarian cancer in the United States: implications for genetic testing. Open Health Serv Policy J. 2008;1:34–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Robson M, Offit K. Management of an inherited predisposition to breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:154–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Antoniou A, Pharoah PD, Narod S, et al. Average risks of breat and ovarian cancer associated with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations detected in case series unselected for family history: a combined analysis of 22 studies. Am J Hum Genet. 2003;72:1117–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Pal T, Permuth-Wey J, Betts JA, et al. BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations account for a large proportion of ovarian carcinoma cases. Cancer. 2005;104:2807–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen S, Parmigiani G. Meta-analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2 penetrance. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:1329–33.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Rebbeck TR, Domchek SM. Variation in breast cancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. Breast Cancer Res. 2008;10:108.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Finlay E, Stopfer JE, Burlingame E, Evans KG, Nathanson KL, Weber BL, et al. Factors determining dissemination of results and uptake of genetic testing in families with known BRCA 1/2 mutations. Genet Test. 2008;12(1):81–91.

  9. Pal T, Cragun D, Lewis C, Doty A, Rodriguez M, Radford C, et al. A statewide survey of practitioners to assess knowledge and clinical practices regarding hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. Genet Test Mol Biomark. 2013;17(5):367–75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Jessica Salamone, ScM, CGC, and Kristie Smith, MS, CGC, for their invaluable assistance with the preparation of this manuscript.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stamatia Destounis.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Destounis, S., Arieno, A. & Morgan, R. Implementation of a risk assessment program in a breast-imaging community practice. Breast Cancer 23, 273–278 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-014-0569-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-014-0569-4

Keywords

Navigation