Abstract
Background
While HER2 gene detection in cytological specimens using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) has been reported, the appropriate criteria for such specimens remain controversial.
Methods
Fine needle aspiration (FNA) samples collected from surgically resected breast cancer specimens were rinsed in a cytopreservative solution containing fixative. Then, slides of the FNA samples were prepared by liquid-based cytology (LBC) (ThinPrep system, Hologic) according to the manufacturer’s instructions, and a PathVision HER2 DNA probe kit (Abbott) was used for FISH staining. The results were evaluated using an automated MetaCyte imaging system (MetaSystems, Altlussheim, Germany). HER2 gene amplification was scored using the HER2/chromosome enumeration probe 17 (CEP17) signal count ratio as follows: amplified, >2.2; equivocal, 1.8–2.2; and unamplified, <1.8. The cytology results were compared with the histology results from concordant cases.
Results
Successful results were obtained in 98 of 100 cases, and results from the FNA specimens were in agreement with those from the histological sections in 97 of these 98 cases (accuracy rate, 99 %; kappa, 0.962).
Conclusions
FISH-based assessment of the HER2 gene status is consistent between histological sections and cytological specimens of breast cancer.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Guarneri V, Giovannelli S, Ficarra G, Bettelli S, Maiorana A, Piacentini F, Barbieri E, Dieci MV. Comparison of HER-2 and hormone receptor expression in primary breast cancers and asynchronous paired metastases. Impact on patient management. Oncologist. 2008;13:838–44.
Idirisinghe PK, Thike AA, Cheok PY, Tse GM, Lui PC, Fook-Chong S, Wong NS, Tan PH. Hormone receptor and c-ERBB2 status in distant metastatic and locally recurrent breast cancer. Pathologic correlations and clinical significance. Am J Clin Pathol. 2010;133:416–29.
Kumaki N, Umemura S, Tang X, Saito Y, Suzuki Y, Tokuda Y. Alteration of immunohistochemical biomarkers between pre- and post-chemotherapy: hormone receptors, HER2, and Ki-67. Breast Cancer. 2011;18:98–102.
Leung SW, Bédard YC. Estorogen and progesterone receptor contents in ThinPrep-processed fine-needle aspirates of breast. Am J Clin Pathol. 1999;112:50–6.
Nishimura R, Aogi K, Yamamoto T, Takabatake D, Takabatake S, Teramoto N, Kagawa A, Morita S. Usefulness of liquid-based cytology in hormone receptor analysis of breast cancer specimens. Virchows Arch. 2011;458:153–8.
Konofaos P, Kontzoglou K, Georgoulakis J, Megalopoulou T, Zoumpouli C, Christoni Z, Papadopoulos O, Kouraklis G. The role of ThinPrep cytology in the evaluation of estrogen and progesterone receptor content of breast tumors. Surg Oncol. 2006;15:257–66.
Mezzelani A, Alasio L, Bartoli C, Bonora M, Pierotti M, Rilke F, Pilotti S. c-erbB2/neu gene and chromosome 17 analysis in breast cancer by FISH on archival cytological fine-needle aspirates. Br J Cancer. 1999;80:519–25.
Bofin AM, Ytterhus B, Martin C, O’Leary JJ, Hagmar BM. Detection and quantitation of HER-2 gene amplification and protein expression in breast carcinoma. Am J Clin Pathol. 2004;122:110–9.
Beatty BG, Bryant R, Wang W, Ashikaga T, Gibson PC, Leiman G, Weaver DL. HER-2/neu detection in fine-needle aspirates of breast cancer. Am J Clin Pathol. 2004;122:246–55.
Nizzoli R, Bozzetti C, Crafa P, Naldi N, Guazzi A, DiBlasio B, Camisa R, Cascinu S. Immunocytochemical evaluation of HER-2/neu on fine-needle aspirates from primary breast carcinomas. Diagn Cytopathol. 2003;28:142–6.
Gu M, Ghafari S, Zhao M. Fluorescence in situ hybridization for HER-2/neu amplification of breast carcinoma in archival fine needle aspiration biopsy specimens. Acta Cytol. 2005;49:471–6.
Itoh H, Miyajima Y, Umemura S, Osamura RY. Lower HER-2/Chromosome enumeration probe 17 ratio in cytologic HER-2 fluorescence in situ hybridization for breast cancers. Three-dimensional analysis of intranuclear localization of centromere 17 and HER-2 signals. Cancer Cytopathol. 2008;114:134–40.
Moriki T, Takahashi T, Ueta S, Mitani M, Ichien M. Hormone receptor status and HER2/neu overexpression determined by automated immunostainer on routinely fixed cytologic specimens from breast carcinoma. Correlation with histologic sections determinations and diagnostic pitfalls. Diagn Cytopathol. 2004;30:251–6.
Wolff AC, Hammond MEH, Schwartz JN, Hagerty KL, Allred DC, Cote RJ, Dowsett M, Fitzgibbons PL, Hanna WM, Langer A. American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2007;131:18–43.
McManus DT, Patterson AH, Maxwell P, Humphreys MW, Aderson NH. Fluorescence in situ hybridization detection of erbB2 amplification in breast cancer fine needle aspirates. Mol Pathol. 1999;52:75–7.
Jimenez RE, Wallis T, Tabasczka P, Visscher DW. Determination of her-2/neu status in breast carcinoma: comparative analysis of immunohistochemistry and fluorescent in situ hybridization. Mod Pathol. 2000;13:37–45.
Bozzetti C, Nissoli R, Guazzi A, Flora M, Bassano C, Crafa P, Naldi N, Cascinu S. HER-2/neu amplification detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization in fine needle aspirates from primary breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2002;13:1398–403.
Wolff AC, Hammond MEH, Hicks D, Dowsett M, McShane L, Allison K, Allred D, Bartlett J, Bilous M, Fitzgibbons P, Hanna W, Jenkins R, Mangu P, Paik S, Perez E, Press M, Spears P, Vance G, Viale G, Hayes D. Recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:3997–4013.
Acknowledgments
This study was supported, in part, by the National Hospital Organization Clinical Research Fund and the National Cancer Center Research and Development Fund.
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Nishimura, R., Kagawa, A., Tamogami, S. et al. Correlation of HER2 gene status assessment by fluorescence in situ hybridization between histological sections and cytological specimens of breast cancer. Breast Cancer 23, 211–215 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-014-0552-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-014-0552-0