Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

What we should know in mammography after reduction mammoplasty and mastopexy?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Reduction mammoplasty and mastopexy (breast lift surgery) are becoming increasingly common procedures. Knowledge of characteristic mammographic findings and imaging findings of breast cancer are important to interpret mammography in this population.

Methods

Patients undergoing a mammography examination between March 2006 and March 2012 were consecutively included. Seventy mammography examinations in 39 patients after reduction mammoplasty and 22 mammography examinations in 19 patients after mastopexy were reviewed and analyzed retrospectively. We compared the frequency of each characteristic mammographic finding between reduction mammoplasty and mastopexy. We also analyzed imaging findings of breast cancer in this population.

Results

The most frequent mammographic finding of the reduction mammoplasty was nipple elevation (84.3 %). Other findings included retraction of the lower breast (80 %), thickening of the skin (78.6 %), downward shifting of the glandular tissue (47.1 %), retroareolar fibrotic band (42.9 %), and areolar skin calcification or lipid cyst (35.7 %). The most frequent mammographic finding of mastopexy was thickening of the skin (72.7 %). Other mastopexy findings included elevation of nipple (68.2 %), areolar skin calcification or lipid cyst (36.4 %), retraction of lower position (31.8 %), and retroareolar fibrotic band (31.8 %). Downward shifting of glandular tissue and retraction of the lower portion have statistically lower frequency in mastopexy cases (P < 0.05). Two breast cancers were diagnosed in reduction mammoplasty cases. One was missed and one was detected but difficult to diagnose using mammography.

Conclusion

Although mammography alone is not sufficient for breast screening after reduction mammoplasty, it may be possible to use mammography for postoperative follow-up after mastopexy only. So, operators should recognize that after reduction mammoplasty it will be hard to detect early breast cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Stevenson TR, Goldstein JA. TRAM flap breast reconstruction and contralateral reduction or mastopexy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1993;92(2):228–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hayes MK, Gold RH, Bassett LW. Mammographic findings after the removal of breast implants. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1993;160(3):487–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Danikas D, Theodorou SJ, Kokkalis G, Vasiou K, Kyriakopoulou K. Mammographic findings following reduction mammoplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2001;25(4):283–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Muir TM, Tresham J, Fritschi L, Wylie E. Screening for breast cancer post reduction mammoplasty. Clin Radiol. 2010;65(3):198–205.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Roberts JM, Clark CJ, Campbell MJ, Paige KT. Incidence of abnormal mammograms after reduction mammoplasty: implications for oncoplastic closure. Am J Surg. 2011;201(5):611–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Uematsu T, Kasami M, Uchida Y. Soft-copy reading in digital mammography of microcalcifications: diagnostic performance of a 5-megapixel cathode ray tube monitor versus a 3-megapixel liquid crystal display monitor in a clinical setting. Acta Radiol. 2007;48(7):714–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. American College of Radiology. Breast imaging reporting and data system, breast imaging atlas. 4th ed. Reston: American College of Radiology, 2003.

  8. Miller CL, Feig SA, Fox JW. Mammographic changes after reduction mammoplasty. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1987;149(1):35–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bae MS, Han W, Koo HR, Cho N, Chang JM, Yi A, et al. Characteristics of breast cancers detected by ultrasound screening in women with negative mammograms. Cancer Sci. 2011;102(10):1862–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lee JH, Kim EK, Oh JY, Kwon HC, Kim SH, Kim DC, et al. US screening for detection of nonpalpable locoregional recurrence after mastectomy. Eur J Radiol. 2013;82(3):485–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Abboud M, Vadoud-Seyedi J, De Mey A, Cukierfajn M, Lejour M. Incidence of calcifications in the breast after surgical reduction and liposuction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1995;96(3):620–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Robertson JL. Changed appearance of mammograms following breast reduction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1977;59(3):347–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mitnick JS, Roses DF, Harris MN, Colen SR. Calcifications of the breast after reduction mammoplasty. Surg Gynecol. 1990;171(5):409–12.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Sickles EA, Herzog KA. Mammography of the postsurgical breast. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1981;136(3):585–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mandrekas AD, Assimakopoulos GI, Mastorakos DP, Pantzalis K. Fat necrosis following breast reduction. Br J Plast Surg. 1994;47(8):560–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Miller JA, Festa S, Goldstein M. Benign fat necrosis simulating bilateral breast malignancy after reduction mammoplasty. South Med J. 1998;91(8):765–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Danikas D, Theodorou SJ, Kokkalis G, Vasiou K, Kyriakopoulou K. Mammographic findings following reduction mammoplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2001;25(4):283–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Berg WA, Blume JD, Cormack JB, Mendelson EB, Lehrer D, Bohm-Velez M, et al. Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer. JAMA. 2008;299(18):2151–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Corsetti V, Houssami N, Ferrari A, Ghirardi M, Bellarosa S, Angelini O, et al. Breast screening with ultrasound in women with mammography-negative dense breasts: evidence on incremental cancer detection and false positives, and associated cost. Eur J Cancer. 2008;44(4):539–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiology, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 505 Banpo-Dong, Seocho-Ku, Seoul, 137-040, Korea

    Hanna Kim, Bong Joo Kang, Sung Hun Kim & Hyeon Sook Kim

  2. Department of Radiology, Ewha Womans University, School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

    Eun Suk Cha

Authors
  1. Hanna Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bong Joo Kang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sung Hun Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hyeon Sook Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Eun Suk Cha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bong Joo Kang.

About this article

Cite this article

Kim, H., Kang, B.J., Kim, S.H. et al. What we should know in mammography after reduction mammoplasty and mastopexy?. Breast Cancer 22, 391–398 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-013-0494-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-013-0494-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation