Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Roles of fine-needle aspiration and core needle biopsy in the diagnosis of breast cancer

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

There is controversy regarding which of the two biopsy methods, fine-needle aspiration (FNA) or core needle biopsy (CNB), should be routinely employed for diagnosis of breast cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of FNA compared to CNB and to explore the value of performing both FNA and CNB.

Methods

Two hundred eighty-one patients with breast cancer received FNA alone (group 1: n = 182), CNB alone (group 2: n = 56), or a combination of FNA and CNB (group 3: n = 43). In group 3, FNA was combined with CNB because of an inadequate smear of FNA on immediate cytological examination. Subsequently, the patients underwent definitive surgery or open surgical biopsy based on the clinical findings, and the tumors were pathologically confirmed to be noninvasive or invasive breast cancer.

Results

There was no significant difference in the absolute sensitivity between group 1 (93% for FNA alone) and group 2 (86% for CNB alone). In group 3, on the other hand, the absolute sensitivity was significantly improved to 72% when FNA and CNB were combined (P < 0.05), although it was only 42% for FNA alone and 63% for CNB alone.

Conclusions

The absolute sensitivity of FNA was equivalent to that of CNB when excluding patients who were converted from FNA to CNB based on immediate cytological examination. In the latter patients, however, it was improved by combining FNA and CNB. Therefore, these two techniques should be considered complimentary to one another.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

FNA:

Fine-needle aspiration

CNB:

Core needle biopsy

H&E:

Hematoxylin and eosin

References

  1. Zajdela A, Ghossein NA, Pilleron JP, Ennuyer A. The value of aspiration cytology in the diagnosis of breast cancer: experience at the Foundation Curie. Cancer. 1975;35:499–506.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Dixon JM, Anderson TJ, Lamb J, Nixon SJ, Forrest APM. Fine needle aspiration cytology, in relationships to clinical examination and mammography in the diagnosis of a solid breast mass. Br J Surg. 1984;71:593–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Tabbara SO, Frost AR, Stoler MH, Sneige N, Sidawy MK. Changing trends in breast fine-needle aspiration: results of the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology Survey. Diagn Cytopathol. 2000;22:126–30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cusick JD, Dotan J, Jaecks RD, Boyle WT Jr. The role of Tru-cut needle biopsy in the diagnosis of carcinoma of the breast. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1990;170:407–10.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Clarke D, Sudhakaran J, Gateley CA. Replace fine needle aspiration cytology with automated core biopsy in the triple assessment of breast cancer. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2001;83:110–2.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Garg S, Mohan H, Bal A, Attri AK, Kochhar S. A comparative analysis of core needle biopsy and fine-needle aspiration cytology in the evaluation of palpable and mammographically detected suspicious breast lesions. Diagn Cytopathol. 2007;35:681–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Litherland JC. Should fine-needle aspiration cytology in breast assessment be abandoned? Clin Radiol. 2002;57:81–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Simsir A, Rapkiewicz A, Cangiarella J. Current utilization of breast FNA in a cytology practice. Diagn Cytopathol. 2008;37:140–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Manfrin E, Mariotto R, Remo A, Reghellin D, Dalfior D, Falsirollo F, et al. Is there still a role for fine-needle aspiration cytology in breast cancer screening? Cancer (Cytopathology). 2008;114:74–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Shannon J, Douglas-Jones AG, Dallimore NS. Conversion to core biopsy in preoperative diagnosis of breast lesions: is it justified by results? J Clin Pathol. 2001;54:762–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Cobb JC, Raza AS. Obituary: “alas poor FNA of breast—we knew thee well!”. Diagn Cytopathol. 2005;32:1–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. The Japanese Breast Cancer Society. General rules for clinical and pathological recording of breast cancer. 16th ed. Breast cytology and core needle biospy reporting form (in Japanese) 2008;64–74.

  13. Tsuchiya S, Akiyama F, Moriya T, Tsuda H, Uemura S, Katayama Y, et al. A new reporting form for breast cytology. Breast Cancer. 2009;16:202–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. The Japanese Breast Cancer Society. General rules for clinical and pathological recording of breast cancer. 16th ed. Histological classification of breast tumors. 2008;18–59.

  15. The World Health Organization. The World Health Organization histological typing of breast tumors. Am J Clin Pathol. 1982;78:806–16.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Pisano ED, Fajardo LL, Caudry DJ, Sneige N, Frable WJ, Berg WA, et al. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions in a multicenter clinical trial: results from the radiologic diagnostic oncology group V. Radiology. 2001;219:785–92.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Park IA, Ham EK. Fine needle aspiration cytology of palpable breast lesions. Histologic subtype in false negative cases. Acta Cytol. 1997;41:1131–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Chhieng D, Fernandez G, Cangiarella JF, Cohen JM, Waisman J, Harris MN, et al. Invasive carcinoma in clinically suspicious breast masses diagnosed as adenocarcinoma by fine-needle aspiration. Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol). 2000;90:96–101.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Pisano ED, Fajardo LL, Tsimikas J, Sneige N, Frable WJ, Gatsonis CA, et al. Rate of insufficient samples for fine-needle aspiration for nonpalpable breast lesions in a multicenter clinical trial. The Radiologic Diagnostic Oncology Group 5 study. Cancer. 1998;82:679–88.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Bolmgren J, Jacobson B, Nordenstrom B. Stereotactic instrument for needle biopsy of the mamma. Am J Roentgenol. 1997;129:121–5.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lieske B, Ravichandran D, Wright D. Role of fine-needle aspiration cytology and core biopsy in the preoperative diagnosis of screen-detected breast carcinoma. Br J Cancer. 2006;95:62–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Duijm LEM, Groenewoud JH, Roumen RM, de Koning HJ, Plaisier ML, Fracheboud J. A decade of breast cancer screening in The Netherlands: trends in the preoperative diagnosis of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2007;106:113–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Agarwal T, Patel B, Rajan P, Cunningham DA, Darzi A, Hadjiminas DJ. Core biopsy versus FNAC for palpable breast cancers. Is image guidance necessary? Eur J Cancer. 2003;39:52–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Britton PD, Flower CDR, Freeman AH, Sinnatamby R, Warren R, Goddard MJ, et al. Changing to core biopsy in an NHS breast screening unit. Clin Radiol. 1997;52:764–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Houssami N, Ciatto S, Ellis I, Ambrogetti D. Underestimation of malignancy of breast core-needle biopsy. Cancer. 2007;109:487–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ballo MS, Sneige N. Can core needle biopsy replace fine-needle aspiration cytology in the diagnosis of palpable breast carcinoma? Cancer. 1996;78:773–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Westenend PJ, Sever AR, Beekman-de Volder HJC, Liem SJ. A comparison of aspiration cytology and core needle biopsy in the evaluation of breast lesions. Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol). 2001;93:146–50.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. de Almeida Barra A, Gobbi H, de L Rezende CA, Gouvea AP, de Lucena CEM, Pena Reis JH, et al. A comparison of aspiration cytology and core needle biopsy according to tumor size of suspicious breast lesions. Diagn Cytopathol. 2008;36:26–31.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Leifland K, Lagerstedt U, Svane G. Comparison of stereotactic fine needle aspiration cytology and core needle biopsy in 522 non-palpable breast lesions. Act Radiol. 2003;44:387–91.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Lifrange E, Kridelka F, Colin C. Stereotaxic needle-core biopsy and fine-needle aspiration biopsy in the diagnosis of nonpalpable breast lesions: controversies and future prospects. Eur J Radiol. 1997;24:39–47.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Homesh NA, Issa MA, El-Sofiani HA. The diagnostic accuracy of fine needle aspiration cytology versus core needle biopsy for palpable breast lump(s). Saudi Med J. 2005;26:42–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Hatada T, Ishii H, Ishii H, Ichii S, Okada K, Fujiwara Y, Yamamura T. Diagnostic value of ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy, core-needle biopsy, and evaluation of combined use in the diagnosis of breast lesions. J Am Coll Surg. 2000;190:299–303.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Kocjan G, Bourgain C, Fassina A, Hagmar B, Herbert A, Kapila K, et al. The role of breast FNAC in diagnosis and clinical management: a survey of current practice. Cytopathology. 2008;19:271–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Poole GH, Willsher PC, Pinder SE, Robertson JFR, Elston CW, Blamey RW. Diagnosis of breast cancer with core-biopsy and fine needle aspiration cytology. Aust N Z J Surg. 1996;66:592–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Dray M, Mayall F, Darlingto A. Improved fine needle aspiration (FNA) cytology results with a near patient diagnosis service for breast lesions. Cytopathology. 2000;11:32–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Nasuti JF, Gupta PK, Baloch ZW. Diagnostic value and cost-effectiveness of on-site evaluation of fine-needle aspiration specimens: review of 5,688 cases. Diagn Cytopathol. 2002;27:1–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Dey P, Bundred N, Gibbs A, Hopwood P, Baildam A, Boggis C, et al. Costs and benefits of a one stop clinic compared with a dedicated breast clinic: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2002;324:1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Roche NA, Ray SA, Layer GT. Immediate cytodiagnosis and imaging in the clinical management of discrete benign breast lesions. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1997;79:268–71.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Kooistra B, Wauters C, Strobbe L. Indeterminate breast fine-needle aspiration: repeat aspiration or core needle biopsy? Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:281–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Surgery for Organ Function and Biology Regulation, Graduate School of Medicine, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan

    Tomoko Kurita, Keiko Yanagihara, Shinya Iida, Koji Yamashita, Shun-suke Haga & Eiji Uchida

  2. Division of Diagnostic Pathology, Nippon Medical School Hospital, 1-1-5 Sendagi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8603, Japan

    Tomoko Kurita, Shin-ichi Tsuchiya, Yasuhiko Watarai, Yoichiro Yamamoto & Oi Harada

Authors
  1. Tomoko Kurita
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shin-ichi Tsuchiya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yasuhiko Watarai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yoichiro Yamamoto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Oi Harada
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Keiko Yanagihara
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Shinya Iida
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Koji Yamashita
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Shun-suke Haga
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Eiji Uchida
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tomoko Kurita.

About this article

Cite this article

Kurita, T., Tsuchiya, Si., Watarai, Y. et al. Roles of fine-needle aspiration and core needle biopsy in the diagnosis of breast cancer. Breast Cancer 19, 23–29 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-010-0251-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-010-0251-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation