Abstract
Background
Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is a standard surgical procedure for patients with early breast cancer. The combination of radioisotope (RI) and dye staining is the most accurate method for identification of sentinel lymph nodes (SLN). However, institutions without RI centers perform SLNB by blue dye alone. The identification rate with the dye method alone is inferior to the RI combination method. In our institution, the identification rate of SLNBs by the dye method alone was 95%. So we started this study of SLNB using computed tomographic lymphography (CTLG).
Patients and methods
Three hundred twenty-four patients with primary breast cancer and no clinical evidence of lymph node metastasis were studied. Identification of SLN was performed by CTLG and the dye-staining method. The identification rate of SLNs was analyzed for relation with the clinicopathological findings.
Results
The SLN identification rate was 98.5% with CTLG and 98.8% when combined with the dye-staining method. The identification rate with CTLG was significantly lower in the initial cases. CTLG identified the SLNs in all cases 6 months after its induction. Multi-route multi-SLN patterns, in which SLNs were easily missed by the dye method, were detected in 9.6% of the patients. There was a significant difference in the SLN metastasis rates; partial enhancement of the SLN with CTLG had the consequence that the metastasis-positive rate was high.
Conclusion
The SLN identification rate was improved by combining the dye-staining method and CTLG. CTLG has a superior spatial resolution activity for detecting SLNs precisely; making CTLG available for the prediction of metastases has been suggested. It is possible to perform SLNB with high accuracy by using CTLG in the institutions that do not have RI.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Tangoku A, Yamamoto S, Suga K, Ueda K, Nagashima Y, Hida M, et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy using computed tomography-lymphography in patients with breast cancer. Surgery. 2004;135:258–65.
Veronesi U, Paganelli G, Viale G, Luini A, Zurrida S, Galimberti V, et al. Sentinel-lymph-node biopsy as a staging procedure in breast cancer: update of a randomized controlled study. Lancet Oncol. 2006;7(12):983–90.
Motomura K, Inaji H, Komoike Y, Hasegawa Y, Kasugai T, Noguchi S, et al. Combination technique is superior to dye alone in identification of the sentinel node in breast cancer patients. J Surg Oncol. 2001;76:95–9.
Radovanovic Z, Golubovic A, Plzak A, Stojiljkovic B, Radovanovic D. Blue dye versus combined blue dye-radioactive tracer technique in detection of sentinel lymph node in breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2004;30(9):913–7.
Takahashi M, Sasa M, Hirose C, Hisaoka S, Taki M, Hirose T, et al. Clinical efficacy and problems with CT lymphography in identifying the sentinel node in breast cancer. World J Surg Oncol. 2008;6:57.
Kitai T, Inomoto T, Miwa M, Shikayama T. Fluorescence navigation with indocyanine green for detection sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer. Breast Cancer. 2005;12:211–5.
Minohata J, Tatsumi K, Yoshida A, Ishikawa Y, Wakuya J. Sentinel lymph node biopsy using CT-lymphography with ICG fluorescence navigation in breast cancer. Jpn J Breast Cancer. 2009;24(2):183–8.
Suga K, Yuan Y, Okada M, Matsunaga N, Tangoku A, Yamamoto S, et al. Breast sentinel lymph node mapping at CT lymphography with iopamidol: preliminary experience. Radiology. 2004;230:543–52.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Minohata, J., Takao, S. & Hirokaga, K. Sentinel lymph node biopsy using CT lymphography in breast cancer. Breast Cancer 18, 129–136 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-009-0183-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-009-0183-z