Skip to main content

Recent trends of HER-2 testing and trastuzumab therapy for breast cancer

Abstract

Molecular-targeted therapy using trastuzumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody against human epidermal growth factor receptor type-2 (HER-2), is considered to be effective for metastatic as well as primary breast cancer and has already become a worldwide standard therapy for patients with HER-2 protein over-expression and gene amplification. Pretreatment evaluation of HER-2 status is considered to be essential for selection of patients, and according to the generally used algorithm, cases with an immunohistochemistry (IHC) score of 3+ and positivity upon fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) are thought to be eligible for trastuzumab therapy. In order to develop an appropriate domestic HER-2 testing system in Japan, the Trastuzumab Pathology Committee was established in 2000 and has been used as a forum for active discussions of policies related to HER-2 testing. After trastuzumab therapy and HER-2 testing had become widely adopted internationally, new guidelines for HER-2 testing were proposed by the ASCO/CAP group in 2007. Since then, these guidelines have gradually become accepted and used in many large-scale clinical studies of HER-2-targeting agents. On the other hand, new ISH methods have been introduced, such as bright-field HER-2 and chromosome 17 centromere double in situ hybridization (BDISH) and dual color-chromogenic in situ hybridization (dc-CISH). These methods make it possible to examine HER-2 gene amplification using only one paraffin section like the dc-FISH method, and to observe grains on the HER-2 gene and centrosome-17 by conventional microscopy. These approaches are considered to be reliable and equally as effective as the dc-FISH method. Accurate evaluation of HER-2 status is thought to be most important for appropriate selection of breast cancer patients who will obtain genuine benefit from trastuzumab treatment. In order to perform effective evaluation of HER-2 status, it is necessary to establish a reliable HER-2 examination system and to maintain its quality at a high level.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Abbreviations

IHC:

Immunohistochemistry

FISH:

Fluorescence in situ hybridization

BDISH:

Bright-field HER-2 and chromosome 17 centromere double in situ hybridization

CISH:

Chromogenic in situ hybridization

References

  1. Coussens L, Yang-Feng TL, Liao YC, Chen E, Gray A, McGrath J, et al. Tyrosine kinase receptor with extensive homology to EGF receptor shares chromosomal location with neu oncogene. Science. 1985;230:1132–9.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Yamamoto T, Ikawa S, Akiyama T, Semba K, Nomura N, Miyajima N, et al. Similarity of protein encoded by the human c-erb-B-2 gene to epidermal growth factor receptor. Nature. 1986;319:230–4.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Popescu NC, King CR, Kraus MH. Localization of the human erbB-2 gene on normal and rearranged chromosomes 17 to bands q12–21.32. Genomics. 1989;4:362–6.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Toikkanen S, Helin H, Isola J, Joensuu H. Prognostic significance of HER-2 oncoprotein expression in breast cancer: a 30-year follow-up. J Clin Oncol. 1992;10:1044–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Slamon D, Leyland-Jones B, Shak S, Fuchs H, Paton V, Bajamonde A, et al. Use of chemotherapy plus a monoclonal antibody against HER2 for metastatic breast cancer that overexpresses HER2. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:783–92.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kallioniemi OP, Kallioniemi A, Kurisu W, Thor A, Chen LC, Smith HS, et al. ERBB2 amplification in breast cancer analyzed by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1992;89:5321–5.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Perez EA, Roche PC, Jenkins RB, Reynolds CA, Halling KC, Ingle JN, et al. HER2 testing in patients with breast cancer: poor correlation between weak positivity by immunohistochemistry and gene amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Mayo Clin Proc. 2002;77:148–54.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Umemura S, Osamura RY, Akiyama F, Honma K, Kurosumi M, Sasano H, et al. What causes discrepancies in HER2 testing for breast cancer? A Japanese ring study in conjunction with the global standard. Am J Clin Pathol. 2008;130:883–91.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dowsett M, Hanna WM, Kockx M, Penault-Llorca F, Ruschoff J, Gutjahr T, et al. Standardization of HER2 testing: results of an international proficiency-testing ring study. Mod Pathol. 2007;20:584–91.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wolff AC, Hammond EH, Schwartz JN, Hagerty KL, Allred DC, Cote RJ, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:118–45.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Nitta H, Hauss-Weqrzyniak B, Lehrkamp M, Murillo AE, Gaire F, Farrell M, Walk E, Penault-Llorca F, Kurosumi M, Dietel M, Wang L, Loftus M, Pettay J, Tubbs RR, Grogan TM. Diagn Pathol. 2009 (in press).

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masafumi Kurosumi.

About this article

Cite this article

Kurosumi, M. Recent trends of HER-2 testing and trastuzumab therapy for breast cancer. Breast Cancer 16, 284–287 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-009-0159-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-009-0159-z

Keywords

  • HER-2
  • Breast cancer
  • Trasutuzumab
  • BDISH
  • SISH
  • FISH
  • Immunohistochemistry