Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Preoperative MRI marking technique for the planning of breast-conserving surgery

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

When performing breast-conserving surgery (BCS), it is essential to achieve a complete resection of the tumor while preserving the cosmetic outcome. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of a MRI marking technique for planning of BCS.

Methods

A retrospective review was performed of 14 consecutive patients who underwent MRI in the supine position (supine MRI) using a MRI marking technique. The preoperative histopathological diagnosis was ductal carcinoma in situ in 11 and invasive ductal carcinoma in 3. All of the patients with invasive ductal carcinoma were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The pills of Breath Care® used as MRI markers were placed in the Penrose drain with 2-cm intervals, and drains were put on the resection lines as determined by ultrasonography (US). The final resection lines were modified using information obtained by supine MRI. The rate of the margin-tumor distance (RMTD: longer margin-tumor distance/shorter margin-tumor distance) was calculated.

Results

Thirteen patients (93%) needed modification of the first resection line, whereas one patient (7%) needed no modification. Twelve patients (86%) had negative margins, but two patients (14%) had positive margins: one patient had a medial margin, while the other had a distal margin. One patient showed a pathologically complete response after chemotherapy; the RMTD was not evaluated. Among the 12 patients with medial and lateral negative margins, the medial and lateral margin-tumor distances ranged from 1.0 to 3.5 cm (average 2.1 cm), and the RMTD ranged from 1 to 3.0 (average 1.5).

Conclusion

Our MRI marking technique may be useful for evaluating the extent of the tumor as determined by the US examination in difficult cases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sonoo H, Noguchi S, Academic Committee of the Japanese Breast Cancer Society. Results of questionnaire survey on breast cancer surgery in Japan 2004–2006. Breast Cancer. 2008;15:3–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Park CC, Mitsumori M, Nixon A, Recht A, Connolly J, Gelman R, et al. Outcome at 8 years after breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy for invasive breast cancer: influence of margin status and systemic therapy on local recurrence. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18:1668–75.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Wazer DE, Jabro G, Ruthazer R, Schmid C, Safaii H, Schmidt-Ullrich RK. Extent of margin positivity as a predictor for local recurrence after breast conserving irradiation. Radiat Oncol Investig. 1999;7:111–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Spivack B, Khanna MM, Tafra L, Juillard G, Giuliano AE. Margin status and local recurrence after breast-conserving surgery. Arch Surg. 1994;129:952–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Vrieling C, Collette L, Fourquet A, Hoogenraad WJ, Horiot JH, Jager JJ, et al. The influence of patient, tumor and treatment factors on the cosmetic results after breast-conserving therapy in the EORTC ‘boost vs. no boost’ trial. EORTC Radiotherapy and Breast Cancer Cooperative Groups. Radiother Oncol. 2000;55:219–32.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kaiser WA, Zeitler E. MR imaging of the breast: fast imaging sequences with and without Gd-DTPA. Preliminary observations. Radiology. 1989;170:681–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Orel SG, Schnall MD. MR imaging of the breast for the detection, diagnosis, and staging of breast cancer. Radiology. 2001;220:13–30.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Schouten van der Velden AP, Boetes C, Bult P, Wobbes T. The value of magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosis and size assessment of in situ and small invasive breast carcinoma. Am J Surg. 2006;192:172–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Boetes C, Mus RD, Holland R, Barentsz JO, Strijk SP, Wobbes T, et al. Breast tumors: comparative accuracy of MR imaging relative to mammography and US for demonstrating extent. Radiology. 1995;197:743–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Nishikawa K, Tozaki M, Fukuda K. Supine MR mammography with parallel imaging technique. Jpn J Magn Reson Med. 2004;24:34–9 (in Japanese with English abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Tozaki M, Fukuda K. Supine MR mammography using VIBE with parallel acquisition technique for the planning of breast-conserving surgery: clinical feasibility. Breast. 2006;15:137–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ogawa T, Tozaki M, Yamashiro N, Kawano N, Suzuki T, Ozaki S, et al. New preoperative MRI marking technique for a patient with ductal carcinoma in situ. Breast Cancer. 2008;15:309–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. World Health Organization Classification. Pathology and genetics of tumours of the breast and female genital organs. Lyon: IARC; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fukuma E. Endoscopic breast surgery for breast cancer. Nippon Geka Gakkai Zasshi. 2006;107:64–8 (in Japanese with English abstract).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Klein Zeggelink WF, Deurloo EE, Muller SH, Schultze Kool LJ, Gilhuijs KG. Reproducibility of mammary gland structure during repeat setups in a supine position. Med Phys. 2002;29:2062–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Nakamura R, Nagashima T, Sakakibara M, Sangai T, Fujimoto H, Arai M, et al. Breast-conserving surgery using supine magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Breast. 2008;17:245–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Tozaki M, Kobayashi T, Uno S, Aiba K, Takeyama H, Shioya H, et al. Breast-conserving surgery after chemotherapy: value of MDCT for determining tumor distribution and shrinkage pattern. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;186:431–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Partridge SC, Gibbs JE, Lu Y, Esserman LJ, Sudilovsky D, Hylton NM. Accuracy of MR imaging for revealing residual breast cancer in patients who have undergone neoadjuvant chemotherapy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002;179:1193–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Norie Yamashiro.

About this article

Cite this article

Yamashiro, N., Tozaki, M., Ogawa, T. et al. Preoperative MRI marking technique for the planning of breast-conserving surgery. Breast Cancer 16, 223–228 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-008-0088-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-008-0088-2

Keywords

Navigation