PCR-Based Methods for the Diagnosis of Invasive Candidiasis: Are They Ready for Use in the Clinic?

Advances in Diagnosis of Invasive Fungal Infections (S Chen, Section Editor)
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Topical Collection on Advances in Diagnosis of Invasive Fungal Infections

Abstract

Purpose of Review

We review the performance of Candida PCR and the T2Candida panel (T2Biosystems, Lexington, MA) in diagnosing invasive candidiasis, consider how these tests may be incorporated into patient care, and determine if they are ready to be used in the clinic.

Recent Findings

PCR and T2Candida sensitivity/specificity for diagnosing candidemia are ~ 90%/90% and ~ 90%/98%, respectively. Limited data for intra-abdominal candidiasis suggest PCR sensitivity of ~ 85–90%, but specificity has varied from 33 to 97%. T2Candida data are lacking for infections other than candidemia.

Summary

PCR and T2Candida will have the greatest value if their use is restricted to cases in which positive and negative predictive values differ in a clinically meaningful way from the pre-test likelihood. Studies are needed to establish that patient care and stewardship strategies incorporating Candida PCR or T2Candida improve patients’ outcomes, reduce unnecessary antifungal usage, limit emergence of resistance, and are cost-effective. The development and validation of standardized PCR assays is a top priority.

Keywords

Candidiasis Candidemia PCR T2Candida Diagnostic Bayesian 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

Drs. Clancy and Nguyen have served as principal investigators for clinical trials sponsored by T2 Biosystems and ViraCor Eurofins. Dr. Clancy has spoken at symposia sponsored by T2 Biosystems.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. 1.
    Clancy CJ, Nguyen MH. Finding the “missing 50%” of invasive candidiasis: how nonculture diagnostics will improve understanding of disease spectrum and transform patient care. Clin Infect Dis. 2013;56(9):1284–92.  https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/cit006.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Vergidis P, Clancy CJ, Shields RK, Park SY, Wildfeuer BN, Simmons RL, et al. Intra-abdominal candidiasis: the importance of early source control and antifungal treatment. PloS One. 2016;11(4):e0153247.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153247.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Andes DR, Safdar N, Baddley JW, Playford G, Reboli AC, Rex JH, et al. Impact of treatment strategy on outcomes in patients with candidemia and other forms of invasive candidiasis: a patient-level quantitative review of randomized trials. Clin Infect Dis. 2012;54(8):1110–22.  https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/cis021.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Clancy CJ, Nguyen MH. The end of an era in defining the optimal treatment of invasive candidiasis. Clin Infect Dis. 2012;54(8):1123–5.  https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/cis023.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fortun J, Meije Y, Buitrago MJ, Gago S, Bernal-Martinez L, Peman J, et al. Clinical validation of a multiplex real-time PCR assay for detection of invasive candidiasis in intensive care unit patients. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2014;69(11):3134–41.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dku225.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Leon C, Ruiz-Santana S, Saavedra P, Castro C, Loza A, Zakariya I, et al. Contribution of Candida biomarkers and DNA detection for the diagnosis of invasive candidiasis in ICU patients with severe abdominal conditions. Crit Care. 2016;20(1):149.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-016-1324-3.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mikulska M, Calandra T, Sanguinetti M, Poulain D, Viscoli C. The use of mannan antigen and anti-mannan antibodies in the diagnosis of invasive candidiasis: recommendations from the Third European Conference on Infections in Leukemia. Crit Care. 2010;14(6):R222.  https://doi.org/10.1186/cc9365.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    He S, Hang JP, Zhang L, Wang F, Zhang DC, Gong FH. A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy of serum 1,3-beta-d-glucan for invasive fungal infection: focus on cutoff levels. J Microbiol Immunol Inf = Wei mian yu gan ran za zhi. 2014;  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmii.2014.06.009.
  9. 9.
    Karageorgopoulos DE, Vouloumanou EK, Ntziora F, Michalopoulos A, Rafailidis PI, Falagas ME. beta-D-glucan assay for the diagnosis of invasive fungal infections: a meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;52(6):750–70.  https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciq206.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Onishi A, Sugiyama D, Kogata Y, Saegusa J, Sugimoto T, Kawano S, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of serum 1,3-beta-D-glucan for pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia, invasive candidiasis, and invasive aspergillosis: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Microbiol. 2012;50(1):7–15.  https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.05267-11.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Colombo AL, de Almeida Junior JN, Slavin MA, Chen SC, Sorrell TC. Candida and invasive mould diseases in non-neutropenic critically ill patients and patients with haematological cancer. Lancet Infect Dis. 2017;17(11):e344–e56.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30304-3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    •• Clancy CJ PP, Vazquez J, Judson MA, Kontoyiannis DP, Thompson GR, Garey KW, Reboli A, Greenberg RN, Apewokin S, Lyons GM, Ostrosky-Zeichner L, Wu AHB, Tobin E, Nguyen MH, Caliendo AM. Detecting infections rapidly and easily for Candidemia Trial-2 (DIRECT2): a prospective, multicenter study of the T2Candida Panel Clin Infect Dis. 2018:(in press). DIRECT2 is a multi-center clinical trial that validated the clinical sensitivity of the T2Candida panel for the diagnosis of candidemia using patient samples and demonstrated that T2Candida is more likely to remain positive than blood cultures among patients with candidemia who are being treated with antifungal agents. Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    • Mylonakis E, Clancy CJ, Ostrosky-Zeichner L, Garey KW, Alangaden GJ, Vazquez JA, et al. T2 magnetic resonance assay for the rapid diagnosis of candidemia in whole blood: a clinical trial. Clin Infect Dis. 2015;60(6):892–9.  https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciu959. DIRECT is a multi-center clinical trial that used spiked samples and whole blood from patients in whom blood cultures were negative to demonstrate sensitivity and specificity of T2Candida for candidemia of 91 and 98%, respectively; turn-around time of T2Candida was 4.4 ±1.0 h. PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Avni T, Leibovici L, Paul M. PCR diagnosis of invasive candidiasis: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Microbiol. 2011;49(2):665–70.  https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.01602-10.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nguyen MH, Wissel MC, Shields RK, Salomoni MA, Hao B, Press EG, et al. Performance of Candida real-time polymerase chain reaction, beta-D-glucan assay, and blood cultures in the diagnosis of invasive candidiasis. Clin Infect Dis. 2012;54(9):1240–8.  https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/cis200.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pfaller MA, Messer SA, Moet GJ, Jones RN, Castanheira M. Candida bloodstream infections: comparison of species distribution and resistance to echinocandin and azole antifungal agents in intensive care unit (ICU) and non-ICU settings in the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (2008–2009). Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2011;38(1):65–9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2011.02.016.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jung DS, Farmakiotis D, Jiang Y, Tarrand JJ, Kontoyiannis DP. Uncommon Candida species fungemia among cancer patients, Houston, Texas. USA. Emerg Infect Dis. 2015;21(11):1942–50.  https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2111.150404.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mylonakis E CC, Ostrosky-Zeichner L, Garey KW, Alangaden GJ, Vazquez JA, Groeger SJ, Judson MA, Vinagre YM, Heard SO, Zervou FN, Zacharioudakis IM, Kontoyiannis DP, Pappas PG. T2 magnetic resonance assay for the rapid diagnosis of candidemia in whole blood: a clinical trial CID. 2014.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Clancy CJ, Nguyen MH. Undiagnosed invasive candidiasis: incorporating non-culture diagnostics into rational prophylactic and preemptive antifungal strategies. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2014;12(7):731–4.  https://doi.org/10.1586/14787210.2014.919853.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Clancy CJ, Nguyen MH. Diagnostic methods for detection of blood-borne Candidiasis. Methods Mol Biol. 2016;1356:215–38.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3052-4_16.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Blumberg HM, Jarvis WR, Soucie JM, Edwards JE, Patterson JE, Pfaller MA, et al. Risk factors for candidal bloodstream infections in surgical intensive care unit patients: the NEMIS prospective multicenter study. The National Epidemiology of Mycosis Survey. Clin Infect Dis. 2001;33(2):177–86.  https://doi.org/10.1086/321811.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ng K, Schorr C, Reboli AC, Zanotti S, Tsigrelis C. Incidence and mortality of sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock in intensive care unit patients with candidemia. Infect Dis (Lond). 2015;47(8):584–7.  https://doi.org/10.3109/23744235.2015.1028100.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Boogaerts M, Winston DJ, Bow EJ, Garber G, Reboli AC, Schwarer AP, et al. Intravenous and oral itraconazole versus intravenous amphotericin B deoxycholate as empirical antifungal therapy for persistent fever in neutropenic patients with cancer who are receiving broad-spectrum antibacterial therapy. A randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 2001;135(6):412–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Walsh TJ, Finberg RW, Arndt C, Hiemenz J, Schwartz C, Bodensteiner D, et al. Liposomal amphotericin B for empirical therapy in patients with persistent fever and neutropenia. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1999;340(10):764–71.  https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199903113401004.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Walsh TJ, Pappas P, Winston DJ, Lazarus HM, Petersen F, Raffalli J, et al. Voriconazole compared with liposomal amphotericin B for empirical antifungal therapy in patients with neutropenia and persistent fever. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(4):225–34.  https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM200201243460403.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Walsh TJ, Teppler H, Donowitz GR, Maertens JA, Baden LR, Dmoszynska A, et al. Caspofungin versus liposomal amphotericin B for empirical antifungal therapy in patients with persistent fever and neutropenia. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(14):1391–402.  https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa040446.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Leon C, Ruiz-Santana S, Saavedra P, Galvan B, Blanco A, Castro C, et al. Usefulness of the “Candida score” for discriminating between Candida colonization and invasive candidiasis in non-neutropenic critically ill patients: a prospective multicenter study. Crit Care Med. 2009;37(5):1624–33.  https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0b013e31819daa14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Magill SS, Swoboda SM, Johnson EA, Merz WG, Pelz RK, Lipsett PA, et al. The association between anatomic site of Candida colonization, invasive candidiasis, and mortality in critically ill surgical patients. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2006;55(4):293–301.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2006.03.013.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ostrosky-Zeichner L, Sable C, Sobel J, Alexander BD, Donowitz G, Kan V, et al. Multicenter retrospective development and validation of a clinical prediction rule for nosocomial invasive candidiasis in the intensive care setting. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2007;26(4):271–6.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-007-0270-z.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Aslam S, Hernandez M, Thornby J, Zeluff B, Darouiche RO. Risk factors and outcomes of fungal ventricular-assist device infections. Clin Infect Dis. 2010;50(5):664–71.  https://doi.org/10.1086/650454.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Shoham S, Shaffer R, Sweet L, Cooke R, Donegan N, Boyce S. Candidemia in patients with ventricular assist devices. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;44(2):e9–12.  https://doi.org/10.1086/509640.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Ostrosky-Zeichner L, Shoham S, Vazquez J, Reboli A, Betts R, Barron MA, et al. MSG-01: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of caspofungin prophylaxis followed by preemptive therapy for invasive candidiasis in high-risk adults in the critical care setting. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;58(9):7.  https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciu074.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    • Playford EG, Lipman J, Jones M, Lau AF, Kabir M, Chen SC, et al. Problematic dichotomization of risk for intensive care unit (ICU)-acquired invasive candidiasis: results using a risk-predictive model to categorize 3 levels of risk from a multicenter prospective cohort of Australian ICU patients. Clin Infect Dis. 2016;63(11):1463–9.  https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciw610. In this multi-study from Australia, investigators developed a prediction model for invasive candidiasis in ICU pts that assigns three levels of risk; the model should be amenable to incorporating non-culture diagnostic test results, thereby further stratifying the groups. PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    • Timsit JF, Azoulay E, Schwebel C, Charles PE, Cornet M, Souweine B, et al. Empirical micafungin treatment and survival without invasive fungal infection in adults with ICU-acquired sepsis, candida colonization, and multiple organ failure: the EMPIRICUS Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA: J Am Med Assoc. 2016;316(15):1555–64.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.14655. EMPIRICUS is a multi-center trial that showed a benefit of empiric micafungin in decreasing new invasive fungal infections (IFIs) among ICU patients with a 12% incidence of infection, but failed to show a benefit in survival. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Hall AM, Poole LA, Renton B, Wozniak A, Fisher M, Neal T, et al. Prediction of invasive candidal infection in critically ill patients with severe acute pancreatitis. Crit Care. 2013;17(2):R49.  https://doi.org/10.1186/cc12569.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Matuszkiewicz-Rowinska J. Update on fungal peritonitis and its treatment. Perit Dial Int. 2009;29(Suppl 2):S161–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Knitsch W, Vincent JL, Utzolino S, Francois B, Dinya T, Dimopoulos G, et al. A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of preemptive antifungal therapy for the prevention of invasive candidiasis following gastrointestinal surgery for intra-abdominal infections. Clin Infect Dis. 2015;61(11):1671–8.  https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/civ707.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Calandra T, Bille J, Schneider R, Mosimann F, Francioli P. Clinical significance of Candida isolated from peritoneum in surgical patients. Lancet. 1989;2(8677):1437–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Tissot F, Lamoth F, Hauser PM, Orasch C, Fluckiger U, Siegemund M, et al. beta-glucan antigenemia anticipates diagnosis of blood culture-negative intraabdominal candidiasis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013;188(9):1100–9.  https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201211-2069OC.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of MedicineUniversity of PittsburghPittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations