STS in Japan in Light of the Science Café Movement
Science communication is definitely one of the most prominent topics in Japanese STS, especially over the last several years. The year 2005 is considered to have been the “First Year of Japanese Science Communication” (Kobayashi 2007: 18). It was a landmark year when science communicator training programs were established in three universities under the auspices of the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology (MEXT). In addition, two leading national science museums also launched similar training programs the following year when the Third Science and Technology Basic Plan (FY2006-2010) was announced by the government. The plan sought to (1) encourage outreach activities by universities and research institutes, (2) promote public participation in science and technology, and (3) help cultivate professional science communicators (Government of Japan 2006). Because it was explicitly embedded in government science and technology policy, science communication began to...
KeywordsPublic Engagement Technology Policy Mutual Learning Japanese Science Theoretical Commitment
- Balling, G., & Schuler, E. (2004). The science café: Science, art and culture. Denmark: Hovedland.Google Scholar
- Government of Japan. (2006). Science and technology basic plan (provisional translation). http://www8.cao.go.jp/cstp/english/basic/3rd-Basic-Plan-rev.pdf. Last accessed on: 20 Sept 2009.
- Kobayashi, T. 小林傳司 (2007). The Age of trans-science: Bridging science, technology and society. トランス・サイエンスの時代―科学技術と社会をつなぐ. Tokyo: NTT Publishing. 東京: NTT出版.Google Scholar
- Matsuda, K. 松田健太郎 (2008). “Science Cafe in Japan: A Report of the Poster Exhibition and the Workshop about Science Cafe in Science Agora 2007,” 日本のサイエンスカフェをみる : サイエンスアゴラ2007 でのサイエンスカフェポスター展・ワークショップから, Japanese Journal of Science Communication, 科学技術コミュニケーション, 3, 3-15.Google Scholar
- Nakamura, M. 中村征樹 (2008). “Science café: Its Scope and challenge,” サイエンスカフェ―現状と課題, Journal of science and technology studies, 科学技術社会論研究, 5, 31-43.Google Scholar