Silicene nanoribbons on transition metal dichalcogenide substrates: Effects on electronic structure and ballistic transport
- 225 Downloads
- 1 Citations
Abstract
The idea of stacking multiple monolayers of different two-dimensional materials has become a global pursuit. In this work, a silicene armchair nanoribbon of width W and van der Waals-bonded to different transition-metal dichalcogenide (TMD) bilayer substrates MoX2 and WX2, where X = S, Se, Te is considered. The orbital resolved electronic structure and ballistic transport properties of these systems are simulated by employing van der Waals-corrected density functional theory and nonequilibrium Green’s functions. We find that the lattice mismatch with the underlying substrate determines the electronic structure, correlated with the silicene buckling distortion and ultimately with the contact resistance of the two-terminal system. The smallest lattice mismatch, obtained with the MoTe2 substrate, results in the silicene ribbon properties coming close to those of a freestanding one. With the TMD bilayer acting as a dielectric layer, the electronic structure is tunable from a direct to an indirect semiconducting layer, and subsequently to a metallic electronic dispersion layer, with a moderate applied perpendicular electric field.
Keywords
silicene transition metal dichalcogenides van der Waals heterostructure electronic structure ballistic transportPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- [1]Geim, A. K.; Grigorieva, I. V. Van der Waals heterostructures. Nature 2013, 499, 419–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [2]Castro Neto, A. H.; Guinea, F.; Peres, N. M. R.; Novoselov, K. S.; Geim, A. K. The electronic properties of graphene. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2009, 81, 109–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [3]Miró, P.; Audiffred, M.; Heine, T. An atlas of two-dimensional materials. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 6537–6554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [4]Vogt, P.; De Padova, P.; Quaresima, C.; Avila, J.; Frantzeskakis, E.; Asensio, M. C.; Resta, A.; Ealet, B.; Le Lay, G. Silicene: Compelling experimental evidence for graphenelike two-dimensional silicon. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2012, 108, 155501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [5]Chiappe, D.; Scalise, E.; Cinquanta, E.; Grazianetti, C.; van den Broek, B.; Fanciulli, M.; Houssa, M.; Molle, A. Twodimensional Si nanosheets with local hexagonal structure on a MoS2 surface. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 2096–2101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [6]Dávila, M. E.; Xian, L.; Cahangirov, S.; Rubio, A.; Le Lay, G. Germanene: A novel two-dimensional germanium allotrope akin to graphene and silicone. New J. Phys. 2014, 16, 095002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [7]Zhu, F.-F.; Chen, W.-J.; Xu, Y.; Gao, C.-L.; Guan, D.-D.; Liu, C. H.; Qian, D.; Zhang, S.-C.; Jia, J.-F. Epitaxial growth of two-dimensional stanene. Nat. Mater. 2015, 14, 1020–1025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [8]Radisavljevic, B.; Radenovic, A.; Brivio, J.; Giacometti, V.; Kis, A. Single-layer MoS2 transistors. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2011, 6, 147–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [9]Bertolazzi, S.; Krasnozhon, D.; Kis, A. Nonvolatile memory cells based on MoS2/graphene Heterostructures. ACS Nano 2013, 7, 3246–3252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [10]Lopez-Sanchez, O.; Alarcon Llado, E.; Koman, V.; Fontcuberta i Morral, A.; Radenovic, A.; Kis, A. Light generation and harvesting in a van der Waals heterostructure. ACS Nano 2014, 8, 3042–3048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [11]Wu, S. F.; Buckley, S.; Schaibley, J. R.; Feng, L. F.; Yan, J. F.; Mandrus, D. G.; Hatami, F.; Yao, W.; Vuckovic, J.; Majumdar, A. et al. Monolayer semiconductor nanocavity lasers with ultralow thresholds. Nature 2015, 520, 69–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [12]Sarkar, D.; Xie, X. J.; Liu, W.; Cao, W.; Kang, J. H.; Gong, Y. J.; Kraemer, S.; Ajayan, P. M.; Banerjee, K. A subthermionic tunnel field-effect transistor with an atomically thin channel. Nature 2015, 526, 91–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [13]Coy Diaz, H.; Avila, J.; Chen, C. Y.; Addou, R.; Asensio, M. C.; Batzill, M. Direct observation of interlayer hybridization and dirac relativistic carriers in graphene/MoS2 van der Waals heterostructures. Nano Lett. 2015, 15, 1135–1140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [14]Reich, E. S. Phosphorene excites materials scientists. Nature 2014, 506, 19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [15]Tao, L.; Cinquanta, E.; Chiappe, D.; Grazianetti, C.; Fanciulli, M.; Dubey, M.; Molle, A.; Akinwande, D. Silicene field-effect transistors operating at room temperature. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2015, 10, 227–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [16]Molle, A.; Lamperti, A.; Rotta, D.; Fanciulli, M.; Cinquanta, E.; Grazianetti, C. Electron confinement at the Si/MoS2 heterosheet interface. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 3, 1500619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [17]Takeda, K.; Shiraishi, K. Theoretical possibility of stage corrugation in Si and Ge analogs of graphite. Phys. Rev. B 1994, 50, 14916–14922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [18]Houssa, M.; Pourtois, G.; Afanas'ev, V. V.; Stesmans, A. Electronic properties of two-dimensional hexagonal germanium. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2010, 96, 082111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [19]Lu, A. K. A. private communicationsGoogle Scholar
- [20]Le Lay, G.; Aufray, B.; Léandri, C.; Oughaddou, H.; Biberian, J.-P.; De Padova, P.; Dávila, M. E.; Ealet, B.; Kara, A. Physics and chemistry of silicene nano-ribbons. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2009, 256, 524–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [21]De Padova, P.; Perfetti, P.; Olivieri, B.; Quaresima, C.; Ottoviani, C.; Le Lay, G. 1D graphene-like silicon systems: Silicene nano-ribbons. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 2012, 24, 223001.Google Scholar
- [22]Schwierz, F. Graphene transistors. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2010, 5, 487–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [23]Schwierz, F.; Pezoldt, J.; Grazner, R. Two-dimensional materials and their prospects in transistor electronics. Nanoscale 2015, 7, 8261–8283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [24]van den Broek, B.; Houssa, M.; Pourtois, G.; Afanas'ev, V. V.; Stesmans, A. Current–voltage characteristics of armchair Sn nanoribbons. Phys. Status Solidi RRL 2014, 8, 931–934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [25]van den Broek, B.; Houssa, M.; Scalise, E.; Pourtois, G.; Afanas'ev, V. V.; Stesmans, A. Two-dimensional hexagonal tin: Ab initio geometry, stability, electronic structure and functionalization. 2D Mater. 2014, 1, 021004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [26]Xu, Y.; Yan, B. H.; Zhang, H.-J.; Wang, J.; Xu, G.; Tang, P. Z.; Duan, W. H.; Zhang, S.-C. Large-gap quantum spin hall insulators in tin films. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2013, 111, 136804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [27]Houssa, M.; van den Broek, B.; Iordanidou, K.; Lu, A. K. A.; Pourtois, G.; Locquet, J. P.; Afanas'ev, V. V.; Stesmans, A. Topological to trivial insulating phase transition in stanene. Nano Res. 2016, 9, 774–778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [28]Kohn, W. Nobel lecture: Electronic structure of matter-Wave functions and density functionals. Rev. Mod. Phys. 1999, 71, 1253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [29]Soler, J. M.; Artacho, E.; Gale, J. D.; García, A.; Junquera, J.; Ordejón, P.; Sánchez-Portal, D. The SIESTA method for ab initio order-N materials simulation. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 2002, 14, 2745.Google Scholar
- [30]Scalise, E.; Houssa, M.; Cinquanta, E.; Grazianetti, C.; van den Broek, B.; Pourtois, G.; Stesmans, A.; Fanciulli, M.; Molle, A. Engineering the electronic properties of silicene by tuning the composition of MoX2 and GaX (X = S, Se, Te) chalchogenide templates. 2D Mater. 2014, 1, 011010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [31]Troullier, N.; Martins, J. L. Efficient pseudopotentials for plane-wave calculations. Phys. Rev. B 1991, 43, 1993–2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [32]Rivero, P.; García-Suárez, V. M.; Pereñiquez, D.; Utt, K.; Yang, Y. R.; Bellaiche, L.; Park, K.; Ferrer, J.; Barraza-Lopez, S. Systematic pseudopotentials from reference eigenvalue sets for DFT calculations. Comp. Mat. Sci. 2015, 98, 372–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [33]Perdew, J. P.; Burke, K.; Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1996, 77, 3865–3868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [34]Grimme, S. Semiempirical GGA-type density functional constructed with a long-range dispersion correction. J. Comp. Chem. 2006, 27, 1787–1799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [35]Dion, M.; Rydberg, H.; Schröder, E.; Langreth, D. C.; Lundqvist, B. I. Van der Waals density functional for general geometries. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2004, 92, 246401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [36]Pang, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, J.-M.; Li, V.; Xu, K.-W. Electronic and magnetic properties of pristine and chemically functionalized germanene nanoribbons. Nanoscale 2011, 3, 4330–4338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [37]Barone, V.; Hod, O.; Scuseria, G. E. Electronic structure and stability of semiconducting graphene nanoribbons. Nano Lett. 2006, 6, 2748–2754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [38]Brandbyge, M.; Mozos, J.-L.; Ordejón, P.; Taylor, J.; Stokbro, K. Density-functional method for nonequilibrium electron transport. Phys. Rev. B 2002, 65, 165401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [39]Büttiker, M.; Imry, Y.; Landauer, R.; Pinhas, S. Generalized many-channel conductance formula with application to small rings. Phys. Rev. B 1985, 31, 6207–6215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [40]Nazarov, Y. V.; Blanter, Y. M. Quantum Transport: Introduction to Nanoscience; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [41]Cahangirov, S.; Topsakal, M.; Atatürk, E.; Sahin, H.; Ciraci, S. Two- and one-dimensional honeycomb structures of silicon and germanium. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2009, 102, 236804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [42]Topsakal, M.; Bagci, V. M. K.; Ciraci, S. Current-voltage (I-V) characteristics of armchair graphene nanoribbons under uniaxial strain. Phys. Rev. B 2010, 81, 205437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [43]Kaneko, S.; Tsuchiya, H.; Kamakura, Y.; Mori, N.; Ogawa, M. Theoretical performance estimation of silicene, germanene, and graphene nanoribbon field-effect transistors under ballistic transport. Appl. Phys. Express 2014, 7, 035102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [44]van den Broek, B.; Houssa, M.; Iordanidou, K.; Pourtois, G.; Afanas' ev, V. V.; Stesmans, A. Functional silicene and stanene nanoribbons compared to graphene: Electronic structure and transport. 2D Mater. 2016, 3, 015001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [45]Duerloo, K. A. N.; Li, Y.; Reed, E. J. Structural phase transitions in two-dimensional Mo- and W-dichalcogenide monolayers. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 4214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [46]Gao, N.; Li, J. C.; Jiang, Q. Tunable band gaps in silicene–MoS2 heterobilayers. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2014, 16, 11673–11678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [47]Yu, M.; Trinkle, D. R. Accurate and efficient algorithm for Bader charge integration. J. Chem. Phys. 2011, 134, 064111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [48]Bader analysis needs a larger kinetic energy cutoff (350 Rydberg) in order to find the zero-flux surfaces and give the atomic charge populations.Google Scholar
- [49]Weinberg, Z. A. Tunneling of electrons from Si into thermally grown SiO2. Solid-State Electron. 1977, 20, 11–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [50]Drummond, N. D.; Zólyomi, V.; Fal'ko, V. I. Electrically tunable band gap in silicone. Phys. Rev. B 2012, 85, 075423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [51]Houssa, M.; van den Broek, B.; Scalise, E.; Pourtois, G.; Afanas'ev, V. V.; Stesmans, A. An electric field tunable energy band gap at silicene/(0001) ZnS interfaces. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2013, 15, 3702–3705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [52]Natori, K. Ballistic metal-oxide-semiconductor field effect transistor. J. Appl. Phys. 1994, 76, 4879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
