Skip to main content
Log in

Extraction method of typical IEQ spatial distributions based on low-rank sparse representation and multi-step clustering

  • Research Article
  • Indoor/Outdoor Airflow and Air Quality
  • Published:
Building Simulation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Indoor environment quality (IEQ) is one of the most concerned building performances during the operation stage. The non-uniform spatial distribution of various IEQ parameters in large-scale public buildings has been demonstrated to be an essential factor affecting occupant comfort and building energy consumption. Currently, IEQ sensors have been widely employed in buildings to monitor thermal, visual, acoustic and air quality. However, there is a lack of effective methods for exploring the typical spatial distribution of indoor environmental quality parameters, which is crucial for assessing and controlling non-uniform indoor environments. In this study, a novel clustering method for extracting IEQ spatial distribution patterns is proposed. Firstly, representation vectors reflecting IEQ distributions in the concerned space are generated based on the low-rank sparse representation. Secondly, a multi-step clustering method, which addressed the problems of the “curse of dimensionality”, is designed to obtain typical IEQ distribution patterns of the entire indoor space. The proposed method was applied to the analysis of indoor thermal environment in Beijing Daxing international airport terminal. As a result, four typical temperature spatial distribution patterns of the terminal were extracted from a four-month monitoring, which had been validated for their good representativeness. These typical patterns revealed typical environmental issues in the terminal, such as long-term localized overheating and temperature increases due to a sudden influx of people. The extracted typical IEQ spatial distribution patterns could assist building operators in effectively assessing the uneven distribution of IEQ space under current environmental conditions, facilitating targeted environmental improvements, optimization of thermal comfort levels, and application of energy-saving measures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Al horr Y, Arif M, Katafygiotou M, et al. (2016). Impact of indoor environmental quality on occupant well-being and comfort: A review of the literature. International Journal of Sustainable Built Environment, 5: 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arthur D, Vassilvitskii S (2007). K-means++: The advantages of careful seeding. In: Proceedings of the 18th Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, New Orleans, LA, USA.

  • Chen T, Geman S (2014). Image warping using radial basis functions. Journal of Applied Statistics, 41: 242–258.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Choi H, Kim H, Yeom S, et al. (2022). An indoor environmental quality distribution map based on spatial interpolation methods. Building and Environment, 213: 108880.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Caro F, Pepiciello A, Milano F, et al. (2023). Measurement-based coherency detection through Monte Carlo Consensus Clustering. Electric Power Systems Research, 216: 109075.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong B, Prakash V, Feng F, et al. (2019). A review of smart building sensing system for better indoor environment control. Energy and Buildings, 199: 29–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doove LL, Van Buuren S, Dusseldorp E (2014). Recursive partitioning for missing data imputation in the presence of interaction effects. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 72: 92–104.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Duan M, Sun H, Wu S, et al. (2023). A simplified model for the evaluation and comparison of the dynamic performance of different heating terminal types. Energy, 263: 125941.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan C, Lin Y, Piscitelli MS, et al. (2023). Leveraging graph convolutional networks for semi-supervised fault diagnosis of HVAC systems in data-scarce contexts. Building Simulation, 16: 1499–1517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiori A, Mignone A, Rospo G (2016). DeCoClu: Density consensus clustering approach for public transport data. Information Sciences, 328: 378–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geng Y, Ji W, Lin B, et al. (2017). The impact of thermal environment on occupant IEQ perception and productivity. Building and Environment, 121: 158–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geng Y, Ji W, Xie Y, et al. (2022a). A sub-sequence clustering method for identifying daily indoor environmental patterns from massive time-series data. Automation in Construction, 139: 104303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geng Y, Zhang Z, Yu J, et al. (2022b). An intelligent IEQ monitoring and feedback system: Development and applications. Engineering, 18: 218–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han J, Kamber M, Pei J (2012). Data Mining: Concepts and Techniques, 3rd edn. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hidalgo-Leon R, Urquizo J, Silva CE, et al. (2022). Powering nodes of wireless sensor networks with energy harvesters for intelligent buildings: A review. Energy Reports, 8: 3809–3826.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang Z (1998). Extensions to the k-means algorithm for clustering large data sets with categorical values. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 2: 283–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jang WS, Healy WM, Skibniewski MJ (2008). Wireless sensor networks as part of a web-based building environmental monitoring system. Automation in Construction, 17: 729–736.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jia K, Chan TH, Ma Y (2012). Robust and practical face recognition via structured sparsity. In: Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Computer Vision, Florence, Italy.

  • Jiang Y, Sun A, Zhao Y, et al. (2019). Proteomics identifies new therapeutic targets of early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma. Nature, 567: 257–261.

    Article  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • John CR, Watson D, Russ D, et al. (2020). M3C: Monte Carlo reference-based consensus clustering. Scientific Reports, 10: 1816.

    Article  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kriegel HP, Kröger P, Zimek A (2009). Clustering high-dimensional data: A survey on subspace clustering, pattern-based clustering, and correlation clustering. ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data, 3: 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lancichinetti A, Fortunato S (2012). Consensus clustering in complex networks. Scientific Reports, 2: 336.

    Article  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Liu G, Yan S (2011). Latent low-rank representation for subspace segmentation and feature extraction. In: Proceedings of 2011 International Conference on Computer Vision, Barcelona, Spain.

  • Liu G, Lin Z, Yan S, et al. (2013). Robust recovery of subspace structures by low-rank representation. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 35: 171–184.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Liu F, Ding Y, Xu F, et al. (2019). Learning low-rank regularized generic representation with block-sparse structure for single sample face recognition. IEEE Access, 7: 30573–30587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lou S, Ma Y (2019). Dimensionality reduction via locality constrained competitive sparse representation by L2-norm regularization. In: Proceedings of 2019 International Conference on Machine Learning, Big Data and Business Intelligence (MLBDBI), Taiyuan, China.

  • Luo Y, Cui D, Song Y, et al. (2023). Fast and accurate prediction of air temperature and velocity field in non-uniform indoor environment under complex boundaries. Building and Environment, 230: 109987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monti S, Tamayo P, Mesirov J, et al. (2003). Consensus clustering: a resampling-based method for class discovery and visualization of gene expression microarray data. Machine Learning, 52: 91–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nie F, Chang W, Hu Z, et al. (2022). Robust subspace clustering with low-rank structure constraint. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 34: 1404–1415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olshausen BA, Field DJ (1996). Emergence of simple-cell receptive field properties by learning a sparse code for natural images. Nature, 381: 607–609.

    Article  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pollard B, Held F, Engelen L, et al. (2021). Data fusion in buildings: Synthesis of high-resolution IEQ and occupant tracking data. Science of the Total Environment, 776: 146047.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Ramos NMM, Almeida RMSF, Simões ML, et al. (2017). Knowledge discovery of indoor environment patterns in mild climate countries based on data mining applied to in situ measurements. Sustainable Cities and Society, 30: 37–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Şenbabaoğlu Y, Michailidis G, Li JZ (2014). Critical limitations of consensus clustering in class discovery. Scientific Reports, 4: 6207.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sha X, Ma Z, Sethuvenkatraman S, et al. (2023). A new clustering method with an ensemble of weighted distance metrics to discover daily patterns of indoor air quality. Journal of Building Engineering, 76: 107289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tekler ZD, Low R, Gunay B, et al. (2020). A scalable Bluetooth Low Energy approach to identify occupancy patterns and profiles in office spaces. Building and Environment, 171: 106681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ünlü R, Xanthopoulos P (2019). Estimating the number of clusters in a dataset via consensus clustering. Expert Systems with Applications, 125: 33–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang D, Li W, Liu Y, et al. (2023). Non-uniform operative temperature distribution characteristics and heat-source-controlled core-area range of local heating radiators. Building Simulation, 16: 87–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu Z, Pan S, Chen F, et al. (2021). A comprehensive survey on graph neural networks. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 32: 4–24.

    Article  MathSciNet  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Xia Y, Zhu M, Jiang A, et al. (2023). Model predictive control of indoor thermal environment conditioned by a direct expansion air conditioning system. Building Simulation, 16: 357–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie J, Girshick RB, Farhadi A (2016). Unsupervised deep embedding for clustering analysis. In: Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML).

  • Yan W, Yang M, Li Y (2023). Robust low rank and sparse representation for multiple kernel dimensionality reduction. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 33: 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ye H, Lv H, Sun Q (2016). An improved semi-supervised K-means clustering algorithm. In: Proceedings of 2016 IEEE Information Technology, Networking, Electronic and Automation Control Conference, Chongqing, China.

  • Yi J, Wu L, Zhou W, et al. (2021). A sparse dimensionality reduction approach based on false nearest neighbors for nonlinear fault detection. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 51: 4980–4992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu Z, Song Y, Song D, et al. (2021). Spatial interpolation-based analysis method targeting visualization of the indoor thermal environment. Building and Environment, 188: 107484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang S, Zhang H (2012). A review of wireless sensor networks and its applications. In: Proceedings of 2012 IEEE International Conference on Automation and Logistics, Zhengzhou, China.

  • Zhang W, Hiyama K, Kato S, et al. (2013). Building energy simulation considering spatial temperature distribution for nonuniform indoor environment. Building and Environment, 63: 89–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Z, Xu Y, Yang J, et al. (2015). A survey of sparse representation: algorithms and applications. IEEE Access, 3: 490–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang L, Chen Z, Zhang X, et al. (2023). Challenges and opportunities of machine learning control in building operations. Building Simulation, 16: 831–852.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao Y, Chen L, Philip Chen CL (2021). Laplacian regularized nonnegative representation for clustering and dimensionality reduction. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 31: 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng J, Yu T, Lei B, et al. (2023). Evaluation of the thermal performance of radiant floor heating system with the influence of unevenly distributed solar radiation based on the theory of discretization. Building Simulation, 16: 105–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou P, Wang S, Zhou J, et al. (2023). A modelling method for large-scale open spaces orientated toward coordinated control of multiple air-terminal units. Building Simulation, 16: 225–241.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study is supported by the China National Key Research and Development Program (Grant No. 2022YFC3801300), the Young Scientists Fund of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 52208113), the Key Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 52130803), and the Hang Lung Center for Real Estate, Tsinghua University. The authors also express special thanks to the Command Center of Beijing Daxing International Airport for their long-term and strong support to this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Methodology was proposed by Yuren Yang, Yang Geng and Borong Lin. Modeling and algorithm writing was performed by Yuren Yang. Material preparation, data collection, data processing and analysis were performed by Yuren Yang, Yang Geng, Hao Tang, Mufeng Yuan, Juan Yu and Borong Lin. The original draft of the manuscript was written by Yuren Yang. Revision of the manuscript was written by Yuren Yang, Yang Geng, Hao Tang, Mufeng Yuan and all authors commented on this version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yang Geng.

Ethics declarations

The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article. Borong Lin is an Editorial Board member of Building Simulation.

Electronic Supplementary Material (ESM)

12273_2024_1117_MOESM1_ESM.pdf

Appendix to Extraction method of typical IEQ spatial distributions based on low-rank sparse representation and multi-step clustering

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, Y., Geng, Y., Tang, H. et al. Extraction method of typical IEQ spatial distributions based on low-rank sparse representation and multi-step clustering. Build. Simul. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-024-1117-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-024-1117-6

Keywords

Navigation