Abstract
Bifacial PV modules have unique advantages in low-carbon building applications such as BIPV systems but often suffer from the shading problem resulting from higher surrounding objects or building facades. Point-blank quantitative studies of PV performance of bifacial modules operating in actual environments as affected by shading on PV cells are lacking due to the difficulties of analysis caused by the existing multiple variable factors. By constructing an experimental comparison system on a flat roof of a building, we experimentally tested and analyzed the comparative variation characteristics of PV performance of bifacial and mono-facial modules under different shading area fractions. The results show that from the viewpoint of photoelectric efficiency, the PV performance of both bifacial and mono-facial PV modules clearly varied with the shading fraction of PV cell in some linear rules, though it is difficult to find regularity from the perspective of output power which was also affected by dynamic solar radiation intensity. An abnormal phenomenon emerged that the photoelectric efficiencies of the bifacial modules with small shading fraction were higher compared to the case without shading. Based on the findings of the experimental results, a regression approximation method based on shading test results (RAST Method) is further proposed to analyze and calculate the bifacial gain of bifacial modules. In the case of the existing roof installation, the mean bifacial gains of the two bifacial modules with different inclination angles were 8.86% and 11.30%, respectively.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Assoa YB, Thony P, Messaoudi P, et al. (2021). Study of a building integrated bifacial photovoltaic facade. Solar Energy, 227: 497–515.
Baloch AAB, Hammat S, Figgis B, et al. (2020). In-field characterization of key performance parameters for bifacial photovoltaic installation in a desert climate. Renewable Energy, 159: 50–63.
Bhallamudi R, Kumarasamy S, Sundarabalan CK (2021). Effect of dust and shadow on performance of solar photovoltaic modules: experimental analysis. Energy Engineering, 118: 1827–1838.
Chen M, Zhang W, Xie L, et al. (2021). Improvement of the electricity performance of bifacial PV module applied on the building envelope. Energy and Buildings, 238: 110849.
Cuevas A, Luque A, Eguren J, et al. (1982). 50 Per cent more output power from an albedo-collecting flat panel using bifacial solar cells. Solar Energy, 29: 419–420.
Deline C, Ayala Pelaez S, MacAlpine S, et al. (2020). Estimating and parameterizing mismatch power loss in bifacial photovoltaic systems. Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications, 28: 691–703.
Dhimish M, Holmes V, Mehrdadi B, et al. (2018). Output-power enhancement for hot spotted polycrystalline photovoltaic solar cells. IEEE Transactions on Device and Materials Reliability, 18: 37–45.
Dullweber T, Gatz S, Hannebauer H, et al. (2012). Towards 20% efficient large-area screen-printed rear-passivated silicon solar cells. Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications, 20: 630–638.
Ghosh S, Yadav R (2021). Future of photovoltaic technologies: A comprehensive review. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 47: 101410.
Gorjian S, Sharon H, Ebadi H, et al. (2021). Recent technical advancements, economics and environmental impacts of floating photovoltaic solar energy conversion systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 278: 124285.
Gu W, Li S, Liu X, et al. (2021). Experimental investigation of the bifacial photovoltaic module under real conditions. Renewable Energy, 173: 1111–1122.
Guerrero-Lemus R, Vega R, Kim T, et al. (2016). Bifacial solar photovoltaics—A technology review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 60: 1533–1549.
Gutiérrez Galeano A, Bressan M, Jiménez Vargas F, et al. (2018). Shading ratio impact on photovoltaic modules and correlation with shading patterns. Energies, 11: 852.
Hayibo KS, Petsiuk A, Mayville P, et al. (2022). Monofacial vs bifacial solar photovoltaic systems in snowy environments. Renewable Energy, 193: 657–668.
He W, Liu F, Ji J, et al. (2015). Safety analysis of solar module under partial shading. International Journal of Photoenergy, 2015: 907282.
IEC (2019). IEC TS 60904-1-2. Photovoltaic devices — Part 1–2: Measurement of current-voltage characteristics of bifacial photovoltaic (PV) devices.
Li Q, Zhu L, Sun Y, et al. (2020). Performance prediction of Building Integrated Photovoltaics under no-shading, shading and masking conditions using a multi-physics model. Energy, 213: 118795.
Li Z, Zhang W, He B, et al. (2022). A comprehensive life cycle assessment study of innovative bifacial photovoltaic applied on building. Energy, 245: 123212.
Liao W, Xu S, Heo Y (2022). Evaluation of model fidelity for solar analysis in the context of distributed PV integration at urban scale. Building Simulation, 15: 3–16
Lopez-Garcia J, Ozkalay E, Kenny RP, et al. (2022). Implementation of the IEC TS 60904-1-2 measurement methods for bifacial silicon PV devices. IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics, 12: 787–797.
Panda T, Sadhukhan S, Acharya S, et al. (2022). Losses in bifacial PERC solar cell due to rear grid design and scope of improvement. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 52: 102280.
Patel MT, Khan MR, Sun X, et al. (2019). A worldwide cost-based design and optimization of tilted bifacial solar farms. Applied Energy, 247: 467–479.
Polo J, Vindel JM, Martín L (2013). Angular dependence of the albedo estimated in models for solar radiation derived from geostationary satellites. Solar Energy, 93: 256–266.
Psiloglou BE, Kambezidis HD (2009). Estimation of the ground albedo for the Athens area, Greece. Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics, 71: 943–954.
Raina G, Sinha S (2022). A comprehensive assessment of electrical performance and mismatch losses in bifacial PV module under different front and rear side shading scenarios. Energy Conversion and Management, 261: 115668.
Skandalos N, Karamanis D (2021). An optimization approach to photovoltaic building integration towards low energy buildings in different climate zones. Applied Energy, 295: 117017.
Skandalos N, Wang M, Kapsalis V, et al. (2022). Building PV integration according to regional climate conditions: BIPV regional adaptability extending Köppen-Geiger climate classification against urban and climate-related temperature increases. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 169: 112950.
Sun X, Khan MR, Deline C, et al. (2018). Optimization and performance of bifacial solar modules: A global perspective. Applied Energy, 212: 1601–1610.
Sylvester KE, Haberl JS (2000). Analysis of the benefits of photovoltaic in high rise commercial buildings. In: Proceedings of the 12th symposium on Improving Building Systems in Hot and Humid Climates, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Tahir F, Baloch AAB, Al-Ghamdi SG (2022). Impact of climate change on solar monofacial and bifacial Photovoltaics (PV) potential in Qatar. Energy Reports, 8: 518–522.
Tina GM, Bontempo Scavo FB, Merlo L, et al. (2021). Comparative analysis of monofacial and bifacial photovoltaic modules for floating power plants. Applied Energy, 281: 116084.
Wu J, Zhang L, Liu Z, et al. (2020). Experimental and theoretical study on the performance of semi-transparent photovoltaic glazing façade under shaded conditions. Energy, 207: 118314.
Yin HP, Zhou YF, Sun SL, et al. (2021). Optical enhanced effects on the electrical performance and energy yield of bifacial PV modules. Solar Energy, 217: 245–252.
Zhao O, Zhang W, Xie L, et al. (2022). Investigation of indoor environment and thermal comfort of building installed with bifacial PV modules. Sustainable Cities and Society, 76: 103463.
Zomer C, Rüther R (2017). Simplified method for shading-loss analysis in BIPV systems. Part 2: Application in case studies. Energy and Buildings, 141: 83–95.
Acknowledgements
This study was sponsored by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (No. 51408278), the Jiangxi Provincial Key Research and Development Program, China (No. 20202BBEL53033) and the Nature Science Foundation of Fujian Province (No. 2022J01233269).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization: Chenglong Luo; methodology: Chenglong Luo, Yuandan Wu; formal analysis and investigation: Xiaoxiao Su, Wu Zou, Qingyang Jiang, Lijie Xu; writing—original draft preparation: Chenglong Luo, Yuandan Wu, Xiaoxiao Su; writing—review and editing: Chenglong Luo, Yanshun Yu; funding acquisition: Chenglong Luo, Lijie Xu; resources: Wu Zou; supervision: Chenglong Luo.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Declaration of competing interest The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.
Ethical approval This study does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Luo, C., Wu, Y., Su, X. et al. Influence and characteristic of shading on photovoltaic performance of bifacial modules and method for estimating bifacial gain. Build. Simul. 16, 1821–1833 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-022-0966-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-022-0966-0