Skip to main content

Application and evaluation of a pattern-based building energy model calibration method using public building datasets

Abstract

Building performance simulation has been adopted to support decision making in the building life cycle. An essential issue is to ensure a building energy simulation model can capture the reality and complexity of buildings and their systems in both the static characteristics and dynamic operations. Building energy model calibration is a technique that takes various types of measured performance data (e.g., energy use) and tunes key model parameters to match the simulated results with the actual measurements. This study performed an application and evaluation of an automated pattern-based calibration method on commercial building models that were generated based on characteristics of real buildings. A public building dataset that includes high-level building attributes (e.g., building type, vintage, total floor area, number of stories, zip code) of 111 buildings in San Francisco, California, USA, was used to generate building models in EnergyPlus. Monthly level energy use calibrations were then conducted by comparing building model results against the actual buildings’ monthly electricity and natural gas consumption. The results showed 57 out of 111 buildings were successfully calibrated against actual buildings, while the remaining buildings showed opportunities for future calibration improvements. Enhancements to the pattern-based model calibration method are identified to expand its use for: (1) central heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) systems with chillers, (2) space heating and hot water heating with electricity sources, (3) mixed-use building types, and (4) partially occupied buildings.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • Andrade-Cabrera C, Turner WJN, Finn DP (2019). Augmented Ensemble Calibration of lumped-parameter building models. Building Simulation, 12: 207–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ANSI/ASHRAE (2014). ASHRAE Guideline 14-2014. Measurement of Energy, Demand, and Water Savings. Atlanta, GA, USA: American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asadi S, Mostavi E, Boussaa D, Indraganti M (2019). Building energy model calibration using automated optimization-based algorithm. Energy and Buildings, 198: 106–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ASHRAE (2017). Chapter 19: Energy Estimating and Modeling Methods. In: ASHRAE Handbook—Fundamentals. Atlanta, GA, USA: American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balaras CA, Dascalaki EG, Droutsa KG, et al. (2016). Empirical assessment of calculated and actual heating energy use in Hellenic residential buildings. Applied Energy, 164: 115–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • California Energy Commission (2013). Building Energy Efficiency Standards for Residential and Nonresidential Buildings. Available at https://ww2.energy.ca.gov/title24/2013standards/.

  • California Public Utilities Commission (2020). The Database for Energy Efficient Resources (DEER). Available at http://www.deeresources.com/.

  • Chen Y, Hong T, Piette MA (2017). Automatic generation and simulation of urban building energy models based on city datasets for city-scale building retrofit analysis. Applied Energy, 205: 323–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, Hong T, Luo X, et al. (2019). Development of City buildings dataset for urban building energy modeling. Energy and Buildings, 183: 252–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, Deng Z, Hong T (2020). Automatic and rapid calibration of urban building energy models by learning from energy performance database. Applied Energy, 277: 115584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chong A, Chao S (2020). A framework for the continuous calibration of building energy models with uncertainty. In: Proceedings of the 16th International IBPSA Building Simulation Conference, Rome, Italy.

  • Coakley D, Raftery P, Keane M (2014). A review of methods to match building energy simulation models to measured data. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 37: 123–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuerda E, Guerra-Santin O, Sendra JJ, et al. (2020). Understanding the performance gap in energy retrofitting: Measured input data for adjusting building simulation models. Energy and Buildings, 209: 109688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deru M, Field K, Studer D, et al. (2011). U.S. Department of Energy commercial Reference Building Models of The National Building Stock. National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL). NREL/TP-5500-46861, doi:https://doi.org/10.2172/1009264.

  • Ding Y, Han S, Tian Z, et al. (2022). Review on occupancy detection and prediction in building simulation. Building Simulation, 15: 333–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DOE (2018). EnergyPlus V9.2 Documentation: Output Details and Examples. U.S. Department of Energy. Available at https://bigladdersoftware.com/epx/docs/9-2/output-details-and-examples/index.html.

  • DOE (2019). BayREN Integrated Commercial Retrofits (BRICR). U.S. Department of Energy. Available at https://www.energy.gov/eere/buildings/downloads/bayren-integrated-commercial-retrofits-bricr.

  • Garrett A, New J (2015). Scalable tuning of building models to hourly data. Energy, 84: 493–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heo Y, Choudhary R, Augenbroe GA (2012). Calibration of building energy models for retrofit analysis under uncertainty. Energy and Buildings, 47: 550–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong T, Kim J, Jeong J, et al. (2017). Automatic calibration model of a building energy simulation using optimization algorithm. Energy Procedia, 105: 3698–3704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong T, Langevin J, Sun K (2018). Building simulation: Ten challenges. Building Simulation, 11: 871–898.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong T, Piette MA, Chen Y, et al. (2015). Commercial Building Energy Saver: An energy retrofit analysis toolkit. Applied Energy, 159: 298–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson N (2017). Building energy model calibration for retrofit decision making. Master Thesis, Portland State University, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kharvari F, Azimi S, O’Brien W (2022). A comprehensive simulation-based assessment of office building performance adaptability to teleworking scenarios in different Canadian climate zones. Building Simulation, 15: 995–1014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • La Fleur L, Moshfegh B, Rohdin P (2017). Measured and predicted energy use and indoor climate before and after a major renovation of an apartment building in Sweden. Energy and Buildings, 146: 98–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lam KP, Zhao J, Ydstie EB, et al. (2014). An EnergyPlus whole building energy model calibration method for office buildings using occupant behavior data mining and empirical data. In: Proceedings of ASHRAE/IBPSA-USA Building Simulation Conference, Atlanta, GA, USA.

  • Lamagna M, Nastasi B, Groppi D, et al. (2020). Hourly energy profile determination technique from monthly energy bills. Building Simulation, 13: 1235–1248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu X, Feng F, Pang Z, et al. (2021). Extracting typical occupancy schedules from social media (TOSSM) and its integration with building energy modeling. Building Simulation, 14: 25–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martínez S, Eguía P, Granada E, et al. (2020). A performance comparison of multi-objective optimization-based approaches for calibrating white-box building energy models. Energy and Buildings, 216: 109942.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raillon L, Ghiaus C (2018). An efficient Bayesian experimental calibration of dynamic thermal models. Energy, 152: 818–833.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramos Ruiz G, Fernández Bandera C, Gómez-Acebo Temes T, et al. (2016). Genetic algorithm for building envelope calibration. Applied Energy, 168: 691–705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reddy TA (2006). Literature review on calibration of building energy simulation programs. ASHRAE Transactions, 112 (1): 226–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth A, Goldwasser D, Parker A (2016). There’s a measure for that! Energy and Buildings, 117: 321–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson HW, Ghorayshi A, Reinhart CF (2016). Analysis of a simplified calibration procedure for 18 design-phase building energy models. Journal of Building Performance Simulation, 9: 17–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • San Francisco Department of the Environment (2020). San Francisco’s Existing Buildings Ordinance. Available at https://sfenvironment.org/article/san-franciscos-existing-commercial-buildings-ordinance.

  • Sun K, Hong T, Taylor-Lange SC, et al. (2016). A pattern-based automated approach to building energy model calibration. Applied Energy, 165: 214–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang R, Wang S, Sun S (2021). Impacts of technology-guided occupant behavior on air-conditioning system control and building energy use. Building Simulation, 14: 209–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang D, Pang X, Wang W, et al. (2020). Evaluation of the dynamic energy performance gap of green buildings: Case studies in China. Building Simulation, 13: 1191–1204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin R, Kiliccote S, Piette MA (2016). Linking measurements and models in commercial buildings: a case study for model calibration and demand response strategy evaluation. Energy and Buildings, 124: 222–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoshino H, Hong T, Nord N (2017). IEA EBC annex 53: Total energy use in buildings—Analysis and evaluation methods. Energy and Buildings, 152: 124–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou X, Tian S, An J, et al. (2022). Modeling occupant behavior’s influence on the energy efficiency of solar domestic hot water systems. Applied Energy, 309: 118503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zibin N, Zmeureanu R, Love J (2016). Automatic assisted calibration tool for coupling building automation system trend data with commissioning. Automation in Construction, 61: 124–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Office of Building Technologies of the United States Department of Energy, under Contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tianzhen Hong.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sun, K., Hong, T., Kim, J. et al. Application and evaluation of a pattern-based building energy model calibration method using public building datasets. Build. Simul. 15, 1385–1400 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-022-0891-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-022-0891-2

Keywords

  • model calibration
  • building energy modeling
  • EnergyPlus
  • building performance simulation
  • monthly energy use