Abstract
Recent studies have shown that office building systems do not adapt well to partial occupancy (e.g., from teleworking) and thus perform suboptimally. As a result, this study aims to assess office building performance adaptability by investigating the impact of four different technologies, including occupancy-based lighting, smart plugs (occupancy-based plug load), demand-controlled ventilation (DCV), occupancy-based thermostat, and their cumulative effect in office buildings in six different Canadian climates. A three-story office building is simulated in EnergyPlus version 9.3.0 under five occupancy scenarios, including 0% occupancy, 100% occupancy, 50% uniformly distributed occupancy across the floor, 50% consolidated occupancy scenario where occupants work in core zones, and 50% consolidated occupancy scenario where occupants work in perimeter zones. The results are compared using energy use intensity (EUI), energy use intensity per occupant (EUP), and the corresponding greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. A total of 180 simulations demonstrate the occupancy-adaptive technologies are generally most beneficial for low occupancy scenarios and milder climates. The results also show the cumulative impact of all these technologies on the potential energy savings is significant in the climates under consideration. Overall, the results show office buildings can improve their performance adaptability during partial occupancy by implementing the studied technologies. Aside from filling in the current knowledge gap in the literature on partial occupancy, the for the first time results of this study systemically demonstrate how each technology performs under different partial occupancy scenarios and how they perform together at each climate.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abuimara T, Gunay B, O’Brien W (2019). Simulating the impact of occupants on office building design: A case study. In: Proceedings of the 16th IBPSA International Conference and Exhibition, Rome, Italy.
Abushakra B, Haberl JS, Claridge DE (2004). Overview of existing literature on diversity factors and schedules for energy and cooling load calculations. ASHRAE Transactions, 110(1): 164–176.
Afroz Z, Hobson BW, Gunay HB, et al. (2020). How occupants affect building operators’ decision-making. ASHRAE Journal, 62(11): 22–30.
Allen TD, Golden TD, Shockley KM (2015). How effective is telecommuting? Assessing the status of our scientific findings. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 16: 40–68.
Al-Saadi SNJ, Ramaswamy M, Al-Rashdi H, et al. (2017). Energy management strategies for a governmental building in Oman. Energy Procedia, 141: 206–210.
ASHRAE (2014). Advanced Energy Design Guide for Small to Medium Office Buildings. Atlanta: American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers.
ASHRAE (2019a). Standard 90.1-2019. Energy Standard for Buildings except Low Rise Residential Buildings. Atlanta: American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers.
ASHRAE (2019b). Standard 62.1-2019. Ventilation for Acceptable Indoor Air Quality. Atlanta: American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers.
Azar E, Alaifan B, Lin M, et al. (2021). Drivers of energy consumption in Kuwaiti buildings: Insights from a hybrid statistical and building performance simulation approach. Energy Policy, 150: 112154.
BBC (2020). Coronavirus: How the World of Work May Change Forever. The British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC).
NRCan (2017). National Energy Code of Canada for Buildings (NECB). Canadian Commission on Building and Fire Codes and National Research Council of Canada.
Chen D, Chen HW (2013). Using the Köppen classification to quantify climate variation and change: An example for 1901–2010. Environmental Development, 6: 69–79.
Deaton J (2020). Empty office buildings are still devouring energy. Why?
DOE (2020). EnergyPlusTM. The U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE) Building Technologies Office. Available at https://energyplus.net/downloads.
Doherty B, Trenbath K (2019). Device-level plug load disaggregation in a zero energy office building and opportunities for energy savings. Energy and Buildings, 204: 109480.
Elldér E (2017). Does telework weaken urban structure-travel relationships? Journal of Transport and Land Use, 10: 187–210.
Environment and Climate Change Canada (2018). Lifecycle analysis (LCA) report. Environment and Climate Change Canada, Strategic Policy Branch, Economic Analysis Directorate, Analysis and Modelling Division.
Ghosh A, Patil KA, Vuppala SK (2013). PLEMS: Plug load energy management solution for enterprises. In: Proceedings of the IEEE 27th International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications (AINA), Barcelona, Spain.
Graizbord B (2015). Teleworking as a mobility strategy for Mexico city. International Planning Studies, 20: 112–130.
Gunay HB, O’Brien W, Beausoleil-Morrison I, et al. (2016). Modeling plug-in equipment load patterns in private office spaces. Energy and Buildings, 121: 234–249.
Hafer M, Howley W, Chang M, et al. (2017). Occupant engagement leads to substantial energy savings for plug loads. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Technologies for Sustainability (SusTech), Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Jemaa KB, Kotman P, Graichen K (2018). Model-based potential analysis of demand-controlled ventilation in buildings. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 51: 85–90.
Jenkins C, Young R, Tsau J, et al. (2019). Effective management of plug loads in commercial buildings with occupant engagement and centralized controls. Energy and Buildings, 201: 194–201.
John St J (2020). Why empty office buildings still consume lots of power during a global pandemic.
Katz S (2020). COVID-19 and building performance: The big picture.
Lowcay D, Gunay HB, O’Brien W (2020). Simulating energy savings potential with high-resolution daylight and occupancy sensing in open-plan offices. Journal of Building Performance Simulation, 13: 606–619.
Mazzeo D, Matera N, de Luca P, et al. (2020). Worldwide geographical mapping and optimization of stand-alone and grid-connected hybrid renewable system techno-economic performance across Köppen-Geiger climates. Applied Energy, 276: 115507.
Meier A (2020). Saving energy in buildings when nobody is in them.
Mendelson B (2020). Trends in energy use during COVID-19 indicate opportunity for value creation.
Mercier C, and Moorefield L (2011). Commercial office plug load savings and assessment: Final report. ECOVA.
Metzger I, Cutler D, Sheppy M (2012). Plug-Load Control and Behavioral Change Research in GSA Office Buildings. Golden, CO, USA: National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL).
Nakanishi H (2015). Does telework really save energy? International Management Review, 11: 89–97.
O’Brien W, Gaetani I, Carlucci S, et al. (2017). On occupant-centric building performance metrics. Building and Environment, 122: 373–385.
O’Brien W, Gunay HB (2019). Do building energy codes adequately reward buildings that adapt to partial occupancy? Science and Technology for the Built Environment, 25: 678–691.
O’Brien W, Yazdani Aliabadi F (2020). Does telecommuting save energy? A critical review of quantitative studies and their research methods. Energy and Buildings, 225: 110298.
Ouf MM, O’Brien W, Gunay B (2019). On quantifying building performance adaptability to variable occupancy. Building and Environment, 155: 257–267.
Peng Y, Rysanek A, Nagy Z, et al. (2017). Occupancy learning-based demand-driven cooling control for office spaces. Building and Environment, 122: 145–160.
Rubinstein F, Enscoe A (2010). Saving energy with highly-controlled lighting in an open-plan office. LEUKOS, 7: 21–36.
Schafer L (2013). Schafer: Pitching in is the new rule at Best Buy.
Vuppala SK, Kiran Kumar HS (2013). HPLEMS: Hybrid plug load energy management solution. Energy Procedia, 42: 133–142.
Wardell J, Gittens C (2020). For many, COVID-19 has changed the world of work for good.
Yang Z, Becerik-Gerber B (2014a). Modeling personalized occupancy profiles for representing long term patterns by using ambient context. Building and Environment, 78: 23–35.
Yang Z, Becerik-Gerber B (2014b). The coupled effects of personalized occupancy profile based HVAC schedules and room reassignment on building energy use. Energy and Buildings, 78: 113–122.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge the generous support of the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC), Brookfield Global Integrated Solutions (BGIS) Canada LP, Ontario Centre of Innovation (OCI), Canada.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kharvari, F., Azimi, S. & O’Brien, W. A comprehensive simulation-based assessment of office building performance adaptability to teleworking scenarios in different Canadian climate zones. Build. Simul. 15, 995–1014 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-021-0864-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-021-0864-x