Skip to main content

Generating prototypical residential building geometry models using a new hybrid approach

Abstract

Building prototyping has regularly been used in building performance analyses with statistically feasible models. The novelty of this research involves a new hybrid approach combining stratified sampling and k-means clustering to establish building geometry prototypes. The research focuses on residential buildings in Ningbo, China. Seventeen small residential districts (SRDs) containing 367 residential buildings were systemically selected for survey and data collection. The stratified sampling used building construction year as the main parameter to generate stratification. Floor numbers, shape coefficients, floor areas, and window-to-wall ratios were used as the four observations for k-means clustering. Based on this new approach, nine building geometry prototypes were identified and modelled. These statistically representative prototypes provide building geometrical information and characteristic-based evaluations for subsequent building performance analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Akbari H, Eto J, Heinemeier K, et al. (1989). Integrated estimation of commercial sector end-use load shapes and energy use intensities. Berkeley, CA, USA: Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Ballarini I, Corrado V (2009). Application of energy rating methods to the existing building stock: Analysis of some residential buildings in Turin. Energy and Buildings, 41: 790–800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Banham R (1984). The Architecture of the Well-tempered Environment, 2nd edn. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Booth A, Choudhary R (2011). Calibrating micro-level models with macro-level data using Bayesian regression analysis. In: Proceedings of the 12th International IBPSA Building Simulation Conference, Sydney, Australia.

  5. Bray D (2006). Building ‘community’: New strategies of governance in urban China. Economy and Society, 35: 530–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Danish Energy Agency (2007). The Energy in Denmark. Energy Consumption and Savings. Danish Building Research Institute, Aalborg University. (in Danish)

  7. Dascalaki EG, Droutsa KG, Balaras CA, et al. (2011). Building typologies as a tool for assessing the energy performance of residential buildings—A case study for the Hellenic building stock. Energy and Buildings, 43: 3400–3409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. de Sa P (1999). Mapping the energy future: Energy modeling and climate change policy. Energy Policy, 27: 433–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Department for Communities and Local Government (2010). English Housing Survey: Headline Report 2008–09, London.

  10. Dong Y (2013). Research on the development of residential buildings in the centre city of contemporary Guangzhou. PhD Thesis, The South China University of Technology. (in Chinese)

  11. Durand J (1799). Recueil Et Parallèle Des Édifices de Tout Genre Anciens Et Modernes. Hachette Livre — BNF. (in French)

  12. Enkvist P, Nauclér T, Rosander J (2007). A cost curve for greenhouse gas reduction. McKinsey Quarterly, 2007(1): 34–45.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Filogamo L, Peri G, Rizzo G, et al. (2014). On the classification of large residential buildings stocks by sample typologies for energy planning purposes. Applied Energy, 135: 825–835.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Fisher RA (1956). Statistical Methods and Scientific Inference. New York: Hafner Publishing Company.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Freire APCF, Elkins MR, Ramos EMC, et al. (2019). Use of 95% confidence intervals in the reporting of between-group differences in randomized controlled trials: analysis of a representative sample of 200 physical therapy trials. Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy, 23: 302–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. GB50352-2005 (2005). Code for Design of Civil Buildings. Ministry of Construction of China. (in Chinese)

  17. German Federal Statistic Authority (2020). Available at https://www.destatis.de/EN/Themes/Society-Environment/Housing/_node.html.

  18. Granade HC, Creyts J, Derkach A, et al. (2009). Unlocking Energy Efficiency in the US Economy. McKinsey & Company.

  19. Hassler U (2009). Long-term building stock survival and intergenerational management: The role of institutional regimes. Building Research & Information, 37: 552–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hernandez P, Burke K, Lewis JO (2008). Development of energy performance benchmarks and building energy ratings for non-domestic buildings: An example for Irish primary schools. Energy and Buildings, 40: 249–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hong Y, Ezeh CI, Deng W, et al. (2020). Correlation between building characteristics and associated energy consumption: Prototyping low-rise office buildings in Shanghai. Energy and Buildings, 217: 109959.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. JGJ134-2010 (2010). Design Standard for Energy Efficiency of Residential Buildings in Hot Summer and Cold Winter Zone. Ministry of Construction of China. (in Chinese)

  23. Keçebaş A, Yabanova İ (2012). Thermal monitoring and optimization of geothermal district heating systems using artificial neural network: A case study. Energy and Buildings, 50: 339–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kragh J, Wittchen KB (2014). Development of two Danish building typologies for residential buildings. Energy and Buildings, 68: 79–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lang DH, Kumar A, Sulaymanov S, et al. (2018). Building typology classification and earthquake vulnerability scale of Central and South Asian building stock. Journal of Building Engineering, 15: 261–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Li X, Yang X (2019). Planning of Ciyun Ancient Street—A practical exploration based on typo-morphological approach. Urban Development Studies, 26(4): 12–16. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Loga T, Diefenbach N (2011). Use of Building Typologies for Modeling the Energy Balance of the Residential Building Stock. Project partner 2: NOA, TABULA Report, D8.

  28. Ma Y (2017). Study on air-conditioning energy consumption and design optimization of a residential building in Hangzhou based on Architectural Typology. Master Thesis, Zhejiang University. (in Chinese)

  29. Martí Arís C (1993). Las variaciones de la identidad: Ensayo sobre el tipo en arquitectura. Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC). (in Spain)

  30. MOHURD (2020). Design Standard for Energy Conservation of Residential Buildings in Hot Summer and Warm Winter Areas. Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of China. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Natarajan S, Levermore GJ (2007). Domestic futures—Which way to a low-carbon housing stock? Energy Policy, 35: 5728–5736.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Ningbo Statistics Bureau (2020). Ningbo Statistical Yearbook. Available at http://vod.ningbo.gov.cn:88/nbtjj/tjnj/2019nbnj/indexch.htm. Accessed 10 Mar 2020. (in Chinese)

  33. People’s Government of Ningbo Municipality (2019). Available at http://data.nb.zjzwfw.gov.cn/nbdata/fore/dataList.html?deptid=2ACEBC6F-1D1F-BCB1-D687-1A091B52B238. (in Chinese)

  34. Peri G, Foresta F, Inzerillo L, et al. (2013). Environmentally assessing buildings characterized by complex shape and innovative materials. Advanced Materials Research, 664: 409–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Rossi A, Eisenman P, Ghirardo DY, et al. (1982). The Architecture of the City. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Santos C, Ferreira TM, Vicente R, et al. (2013). Building Typologies Identification to Support Risk Mitigation at the Urban scale—Case study of the old city centre of Seixal, Portugal. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 14: 449–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Shahrestani M, Yao R, Cook GK (2014). A review of existing building benchmarks and the development of a set of reference office buildings for England and Wales. Intelligent Buildings International, 6: 41–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Shi C, Wei B, Wei S, et al. (2021). A quantitative discriminant method of elbow point for the optimal number of clusters in clustering algorithm. EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking, 2021: 3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. SRC (1985). New Office Buildings End-Use Energy Consumption Survey—For Northeast Utilities Service Company. Berlin, CT, USA: Synergic Resources Corp.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Suchmacher M, Geller M (2012). Practical Biostatistics: A Friendly Step-by-step Approach for Evidence-based Medicine. London: Academic Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  41. Swan L, Ugursal VI, Beausoleil-Morrison I (2009). Implementation of a Canadian residential energy end-use model for assessing new technology impacts. In: Proceedings of the 11th International IBPSA Building Simulation Conference, Glasgow, UK.

  42. Theodoridou I, Papadopoulos AM, Hegger M (2011a). A typological classification of the Greek residential building stock. Energy and Buildings, 43: 2779–2787.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Theodoridou I, Papadopoulos AM, Hegger M (2011b). Statistical analysis of the Greek residential building stock. Energy and Buildings, 43: 2422–2428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Tommerup H, Svendsen S (2006). Energy savings in Danish residential building stock. Energy and Buildings, 38: 618–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Wan KSY, Yik FWH (2004). Building design and energy end-use characteristics of high-rise residential buildings in Hong Kong. Applied Energy, 78: 19–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Wilson D, Swisher J (1993). Exploring the gap Top-down versus bottom-up analyses of the cost of mitigating global warming. Energy Policy, 21: 249–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Wittchen K (2009). Potential Energy Savings in Existing Residential Buildings. SBi 2009: 05. Danish Building Research Institute, Aalborg University, Department of Energy and Environment. (in Danish)

  48. Ye Y, Hinkelman K, Zhang J, et al. (2019). A methodology to create prototypical building energy models for existing buildings: a case study on US religious worship buildings. Energy and Buildings, 194: 351–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Zhang Q (2004). Residential energy consumption in China and its comparison with Japan, Canada, and USA. Energy and Buildings, 36: 1217–1225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Zhang N, Song X, Zhang J, et al. (2019). Types of residential buildings in the rural and pastoral areas of eastern Mongolia from the regional perspective. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 33(01): 171–177. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Zhou Y (2008). Study on the influence on energy-saving by the residential plan in Chongqing. Master Thesis, Chongqing University. (in Chinese)

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research is sponsored by the Ningbo Natural Science Funding Scheme (Project code: 2019A610393). The Zhejiang Provincial Department of Science and Technology is acknowledged for this research under its Provincial Key Laboratory Programme (2020E10018).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Wu Deng conceived and designed the research analysis and revised the paper. Yuanli Ma contributed to the research analysis design and partook in data collation and processing and wrote the paper. Jing Xie, Professor Tim Heath and Yuanda Hong contributed to the design of the research analysis and paper revision. Yeyu Xiang contributed to the data support.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wu Deng.

Supplementary Materials

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ma, Y., Deng, W., Xie, J. et al. Generating prototypical residential building geometry models using a new hybrid approach. Build. Simul. 15, 17–28 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-021-0779-6

Download citation

Keywords

  • building prototyping
  • geometry models
  • new hybrid approach
  • Ningbo China