Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Assessing cooling energy reduction potentials by retrofitting traditional cavity walls into passively ventilated cavity walls

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Building Simulation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A major roadblock in achieving substantial building energy reduction is the low performance of old buildings that account for a significant portion of the building energy consumption. Finding low-cost energy retrofit solutions that do not disrupt occupants’ daily life during the retrofitting is the key to successful building energy retrofit initiatives. In this paper, a novel and low-cost exterior wall retrofitting solution is introduced, and its performance in reducing space cooling load was quantitatively evaluated to demonstrate its feasibility and effectiveness. The primary goal of this paper is to provide a quantitative assessment of the cooling-energy savings potential by using the proposed new wall system. The intended retrofitting targets are the large amount of existing cavity-wall buildings located in hot climate regions. The quantification of the before-after heat-flux reduction was conducted through a 3-dimensional steady-state low turbulence computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model, which is validated by benchmarking its prediction against the published experimental case results. The outcomes of the investigation suggest that this simple low-cost solution has great potentials in reducing buildings’ summer cooling load in hot climate regions. The applicability of this solution is not limited to retrofitting existing buildings. New energy-efficient building designs can also adopt this solution in their envelope systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ampofo F, Karayiannis TG (2003). Experimental benchmark data for turbulent natural convection in an air filled square cavity. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 46: 3551–3572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Autodesk (2017). Autodesk Knowledge Netwark. Available at http://help.autodesk.com/view/SCDSE/2017/ENU/?guid=GUID-0F5C4828-9F91-46B6-A16A-578D72DCFCC. Accessed 5 Feb 2017.

  • Aviram DP, Fried AN, Roberts JJ (2001). Thermal properties of a variable cavity wall. Building and Environment, 36: 1057–1072.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balocco C, Colombari M (2006). Thermal behaviour of interactive mechanically ventilated double glazed façade: Non-dimensional analysis. Energy and Buildings, 38: 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bansal NK, Mathur R, Bhandari MS (1993). Solar chimney for enhanced stack ventilation. Building and Environment, 28: 373–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barkaszi S, Parker D (1995). Florida Exterior Wall Insulation Field Test: Final Report. Oak Ridge National Laboratory. Available at http://www.fsec.ucf.edu/en/publications/html/FSEC-CR-868-95/index.htm. Accessed 26 Nov 2019.

  • Betts PL, Bokhari IH (2000). Experiments on turbulent natural convection in an enclosed tall cavity. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 21: 675–683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouchair A (1994). Solar chimney for promoting cooling ventilation in southern Algeria. Building Services Engineering Research and Technology, 15: 81–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chalfoun N (2011). Using energy simulation and real-time data monitoring to investigate thermal performance of exterior cavity walls. In: Proceedings of the 12th International IBPSA Building Simulation Conference, Sydney, Australia.

  • Charde M, Gupta R (2013). Design development and thermal performance evaluation of static sunshade and brick cavity wall: An experimental study. Energy and Buildings, 60: 210–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chou SK, Chua KJ, Ho JC (2009). A study on the effects of double skin façades on the energy management in buildings. Energy Conversion and Management, 50: 2275–2281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciampi M, Leccese F, Tuoni G (2003). Ventilated facades energy performance in summer cooling of buildings. Solar Energy, 75: 491–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colli AN, Bisang JM (2018). A CFD study with analytical and experimental validation of laminar and turbulent mass-transfer in electrochemical reactors. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 165: E81–E88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ColoradoEnergy (2016). R-value Table. Available at: http://www.coloradoenergy.org/procorner/stuff/r-values.htm. Accessed 20 Jan 2017.

  • Coussirat M, Guardo A, Jou E, et al. (2008). Performance and influence of numerical sub-models on the CFD simulation of free and forced convection in double-glazed ventilated façades. Energy and Buildings, 40: 1781–1789.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denholm P, Ong S, Booten C (2012). Using utility load data to estimate demand for space cooling and potential for shiftable loads. National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL). Available at https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy12osti/54509.pdf. Accessed 26 Nov 2019.

  • Faggembauu D, Costa M, Soria M, et al. (2003). Numerical analysis of the thermal behaviour of glazed ventilated facades in Mediterranean climates. Part ii: applications and analysis of results. Solar Energy, 75: 229–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FLIR (2015). A8300sc User’s Manual. Wilsonville, OR, USA: FLIR systems, inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gan G (2006). Simulation of buoyancy-induced flow in open cavities for natural ventilation. Energy and Buildings, 38: 410–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gratia E, de Herde A (2004). Natural ventilation in a double-skin facade. Energy and Buildings, 36: 137–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gratia E, de Herde A (2007). The most efficient position of shading devices in a double-skin facade. Energy and Buildings, 39: 364–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howell JR, Mengüç MP, Siegel R (2015). Thermal Radiation Heat Transfer. London: CRC Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Maurenbrecher A, Chidiac S (1995). Temperature measurement on brick veneer. In: Proceedings of the 7th Canadian Masonry Symposium, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

  • McGraw-Hill Construction (2010). Energy Efficiency Trends in Residential and Commercial Buildings. US Department of Energy. Available at https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2013/11/f5/building_trends_2010.pdf. Accessed 26 Nov 2019

  • Mehta ML, Scarborough W, Armpriest D (2008). Masonry veneer assembly-general considerations. In: Mehta ML, Armpriest D, Scarborough W (eds), Building Construction: Principles, Materials, and Systems. Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Na R, Shang Z, Shen Z (2016). Time-lapse of cavity brick wall temperature profiles using infrared thermography. In: Proceedings of the 52nd ASC Annual International Conference, Provo, UT, USA.

  • Patania F, Gagliano A, Nocera F, et al. (2010). Thermofluid-dynamic analysis of ventilated facades. Energy and Buildings, 42: 1148–1155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patankar S (1980). Numerical Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow. New York: Hemisphere Publishing Corporation.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Piñon JP, Davidovic D (2004). The airflow characteristics of ventilated cavities in screen type enclosure wall systems. In: Proceedings of the Performance of Exterior Envelopes of Whole Buildings IX, Clearwater Beach, FL, USA.

  • Rodrigues AM, Aelenei L (2010). Thermal performance of a naturally ventilated cavity wall. International Journal of Energy Research, 34: 357–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saelens D, Roels S, Hens H (2008). Strategies to improve the energy performance of multiple-skin facades. Building and Environment, 43: 638–650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sakonidou EP, Karapantsios TD, Balouktsis AI, et al. (2008). Modeling of the optimum tilt of a solar chimney for maximum air flow. Solar Energy, 82: 80–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salim S, Cheah S (2009). Wall Y strategy for dealing with wall-bounded turbulent flows. In: Proceedings of the International Multiconference of Engineers and Computer Scientists, Hong Kong, China.

  • Salonvarra M, Karagiozis AN, Pazera M, et al. (2007). Air cavities behind claddings—What have we learned? In: Proceedings of the Thermal Performance of the Exterior Envelopes of Whole Buildings X, Clearwater Beach, FL, USA.

  • Sanjuan C, Suárez MJ, González M, et al. (2011). Energy performance of an open-joint ventilated façade compared with a conventional sealed cavity façade. Solar Energy, 85: 1851–1863.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solgi E, Fayaz R, Kari BM (2016). Cooling load reduction in office buildings of hot-arid climate, combining phase change materials and night purge ventilation. Renewable Energy, 85: 725–731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stazi F, Tomassoni F, Vegliò A, di Perna C (2011). Experimental evaluation of ventilated walls with an external clay cladding. Renewable Energy, 36: 3373–3385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stovall TK, Karagiozis A (2004a). Airflow in the ventilation space behind a rain screen wall. In: Proceedings of the Performance of Exterior Envelopes of Whole Buildings IX, Clearwater Beach, FL, USA.

  • Stovall TK, Karagiozis A (2004b). CFD analysis of a ventilated brick cavity. In: IEA Annex 41 report A41-T1-US-04-2, 2004. Available at http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.629.8223&rep=rep1&type=pdf. Accessed 4 Dec 2019.

  • Wong NH, Li S (2007). A study of the effectiveness of passive climate control in naturally ventilated residential buildings in Singapore. Building and Environment, 42: 1395–1405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu J, Yang C, Tian L (2008). Low-energy envelope design of residential building in hot summer and cold winter zone in China. Energy and Buildings, 40: 1536–1546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zalewski L, Lassue S, Duthoit B, et al. (2002). Study of solar walls—Validating a simulation model. Building and Environment, 37: 109–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zamora B, Kaiser AS (2009). Optimum wall-to-wall spacing in solar chimney shaped channels in natural convection by numerical investigation. Applied Thermal Engineering, 29: 762–769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Z, Zhang W, Zhai ZJ, Chen QY (2007). Evaluation of various turbulence models in predicting airflow and turbulence in enclosed environments by CFD: part 2—comparison with experimental data from literature. HVAC&R Research, 13: 871–886.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng G, Jing Y, Huang H, Gao Y (2010). Application of improved grey relational projection method to evaluate sustainable building envelope performance. Applied Energy, 87: 710–720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, 19716, USA

    Ri Na

  2. The Durham School of Architecture Engineering and Construction, University of Nebraska Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, 68588, USA

    Zhigang Shen

Authors
  1. Ri Na
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zhigang Shen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ri Na.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Na, R., Shen, Z. Assessing cooling energy reduction potentials by retrofitting traditional cavity walls into passively ventilated cavity walls. Build. Simul. 14, 1295–1309 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-020-0740-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-020-0740-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation