Abstract
Courtyard vernacular underground dwellings most commonly called “dig pit houses”, have been for centuries a shelter for the human kind. Despite their noticeable energy saving properties and security enhancing design features, they present several disadvantages related to indoor environment quality such as poor indoor natural daylighting. The dig pit in these typologies is the main design feature that allows natural light into the rooms. In this paper the effect of changing the courtyard’s geometry on the daylighting performance inside the rooms is investigated by the mean of computer simulations using Ecotect-RADIANCE software pack. The findings of this study show that dimensions corresponding to a WI (Well Index) = 0.5 result in better daylighting performance inside the rooms. Moreover, it shows that increasing the number of wall surfaces on the courtyard surface tend to engender a noticeable improvement of the room’s daylighting.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aizlewood ME (1995). The daylighting of atria: A critical review. ASHRAE Transactions, 101(2): 841–857.
Carmody J, Sterling R (1985). Earth Sheltered Housing Design. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company.
Engineering ToolBox (2012). Materials — Light Reflecting Factors. Available at https://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/light-material-reflecting-factor-d_1842.html
Ghasemi M, Kandar MZ, Noroozi M (2016). Investigating the effect of well geometry on the daylight performance in the adjoining spaces of vertical top-lit atrium buildings. Indoor and Built Environment, 25: 934–948.
Givoni B, Katz L (1985). Earth temperatures and underground buildings. Energy and Buildings, 8: 15–25.
Heba HA, Akashi Y, Aly A, Arima T, Sumiyoshi D (2012). The possibility of applying the earth-sheltered building type for housing projects between humid and dry climates-case study Egypt and Japan. In: Proceedings of the International Society of Habitat Engineering and Design Conference (ISHED), Shanghai, China.
Kim G, Kim JT (2010). Visual environment within the already-built underground development in South Korea. Indoor and Built Environment, 19: 184–191.
Laouadi A (2005). Models of optical characteristics of barrel-vault skylights: Development, validation and application. Lighting Research & Technology, 37: 235–263.
Littlefair P (2002). Daylight prediction in atrium buildings. Solar Energy, 73: 105–109.
Liu A, Navvab M, Jones J (1991). Geometric shape index for daylight distribution variations in atrium spaces. In: Proceedings of the 16th National Passive Solar Conference, Denver, USA.
Liu J, Wang D, Yang L (2002). An instance of critical regionalism: New Yaodong dwellings in north-central China. Field Report, TDSR, XIII, No. II.
Namburi VSKV (2006). Comparative evaluation of lighting design software programs for daylighting in buildings. PhD Thesis, University of Southern California, USA.
Oliver P (1997). Encyclopaedia of Vernacular Architecture of the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Shikder SH, Price AD, Mourshed M (2009). Evaluation of four artificial lighting simulation tools with virtual building reference. In: Proceedings of European Simulation and Modelling Conference.
World Habitat Awards. (2006) The New Generation of Yaodong Cave Dwellings, Loess Plateau. World Habitat Awards. Available at https://www.world-habitat.org/world-habitat-awards/winners-a nd-finalists/the-new-generation-of-yaodong-cave-dwellings-loes s-plateau/#award-content. Accessed Sept 2018.
Yi R, Shao L, Su Y, Riffat S (2009). Daylighting performance of atriums in subtropical climate. International Journal of Low-Carbon Technologies, 4: 230–237.
Acknowledgements
This work is supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2017YFC0702506).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Omrani, M., Lian, Z. & Xuan, H. Effects of the courtyard’s geometry in dig pit underground dwellings on the room’s daylighting performance. Build. Simul. 12, 653–663 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-019-0542-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-019-0542-4