Abstract
Simulating the thermal performance of Double-Skin Facades (DSFs) is a complex issue faced by many architects who attempt to utilise them for energy-saving, acoustic, and aesthetic benefits. EnergyPlus is among the most widely used building simulation programs, and its capability of simulating DSFs is controversial which derives the need for further investigation. DSFs are usually designed with flat surfaces, and thus the simulations performed in previous studies to verify the accuracy of EnergyPlus were almost always dealing with simple flat facades. This paper presents a preliminary investigation into the reliability of EnergyPlus in simulating the thermal performance of a geometrically complex unconventional DSF. The increase of geometrical complexity increases the challenge of DSF simulation. Using CFD, the paper also aims at having a better understanding of the thermal performance of the DSF which was not possible using only EnergyPlus. A numerical experiment is performed in which two models of a DSF are compared; one simulated with EnergyPlus and the other with OpenFOAM CFD software. The average cavity temperature and the volume flow rate of the air at the outlets are compared. Results of the comparison showed minor differences between them, which gives a positive indication of the potential of EnergyPlus in handling complex geometries with complex physical phenomena. Conducting physical experiments on built prototypes to verify the results represents both the main limitation of this work and its future plan. The paper discusses some of the challenges that prevent architects from using CFD, and how they can be addressed, then ends with some design recommendations for DSFs in hot climatic contexts.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abdul Rahman U, Mustapha F (2015). Validations of OpenFOAM steady state compressible solver rhoSimpleFOAM. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Mechanical and Industrial Engineering (ICMAIE 2015), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, pp. 61–66.
Anđelković AS, Mujan I, Dakić S (2016). Experimental validation of a EnergyPlus model: Application of a multi-storey naturally ventilated double skin facade. Energy and Buildings, 118: 27–36.
Angeli D, Dama A (2015). Modelling natural ventilation in double skin facade. Energy Procedia, 78: 1537–1542.
ANSI/ASHRAE (2002). ASHRAE Guideline 14-2002: Measurement of Energy and Demand Savings. Atlanta: American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers.
Chen Q (2009). Ventilation performance prediction for buildings: A method overview and recent applications. Building and Environment, 44: 848.858.
De Gracia A, Castell A, Navarro L, Oró E, Cabeza LF (2013). Numerical modelling of ventilated facades: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 22: 539–549.
DesignBuilder (2014). DesignBuilder Software for Architects. Available at https://doi.org/www.designbuilder.co.uk/software/for-architects
El Ahmar S, Fioravanti A (2015). Simulating the thermal and daylight performances of a folded porous double façade for an office building in Cairo. In: Proceedings of the 49th International Conference of the Architectural Science Association (ASA), Melbourne, Australia.
El Ahmar S, Fioravanti A (2017). Evaluating the capability of EnergyPlus in simulating geometrically complex Double-Skin Facades through CFD modelling. In: Proceedings of the 35th eCAADe Conference: Education and Research in Computer Aided Architectural Design in Europe, Rome, Italy, pp. 757–764.
EnergyPlus (2014). Input Output Reference: The Encyclopedic Reference to EnergyPlus Input and Output. US Department of Energy.
EnergyPlus (2015). Engineering Reference: The Reference to EnergyPlus Calculations. US Department of Energy.
Hashemi N, Fayaz R, Sarshar M (2010). Thermal behaviour of a ventilated double skin facade in hot arid climate. Energy and Buildings, 42: 1823–1832.
Hensen J (2002). Integrated building and airflow simulation: An overview. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Computing in Civil and Building Engineering.
Hensen J, Bartak M, Drkal F (2002). Modeling and simulation of a double-skin facade system. ASHRAE Transactions, 108(2): 1251–1259.
Kalyanova O, Heiselberg P, Felsmann C, Poirazis H, Strachan P, Wijsman A (2009). An emperical validation of building simulation software for modelling of double-skin facades (DSF). In: Proceedings of the 8th International IBPSA Building Simulation Conference, Glasgow, UK, pp. 1107–1114.
Kim DW, Park CS (2011). Difficulties and limitations in performance simulation of a double skin facade. Energy and Buildings, 43: 3635–3645.
Kim D, Cox SJ, Cho H, Yoon J (2018). Comparative investigation on building energy performance of double skin facade (DSF) with interior or exterior slat blinds. Journal of Building Engineering, 20: 411–423.
Kožišek M, Fürst J, Příhoda J, Doerffer P (2016). Implementation of k-kL-ω turbulence model for compressible flow into OpenFOAM. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 821: 63–69.
Loonen RCGM, Favoino F, Hensen JLM, Overend M (2017). Review of current status, requirements and opportunities for building performance simulation of adaptive facades. Journal of Building Performance Simulation, 10: 205–223.
Mateus NM, Pinto A, da Graca GC (2014). Validation of EnergyPlus thermal simulation of a double skin naturally and mechanically ventilated test cell. Energy and Buildings, 75: 511–522.
Mirsadeghi M, Costola D, Blocken B, Hensen JLM (2013). Review of external convective heat transfer coefficient models in building energy simulation programs: Implementation and uncertainty. Applied Thermal Engineering, 56: 134–151.
Mousavi L, Mahdavinejhad M (2013). Search for sustainability in contemporary architecture of Iran. American Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture, 1(6): 129–142.
OpenFOAM (2015). OpenFOAM: The open source CFD toolbox. Available at https://doi.org/www.openfoam.com
Poirazis H (2006). Double Skin Facades: A literature review. IEA SHC Task, 34. Lund University.
Roudsari MS (2017). Butterfly beta release for Grasshopper and Dynamo. Available at https://doi.org/www.grasshopper3d.com/group/ladybug/forum/topics/butterfly-beta-release-for-grasshopper-anddynamo
Sabooni MA, Vaseti HM, Maerefat M, Azimi A (2012). Development of the capability of Energyplus software to simulation of building double-skin facade. In: Proceedings of International Symposium on Sustainable Energy in Buildings and Urban Areas (ICHMT), Kusadasi, Turkey.
Weller HG, Tabor G, Jasak H, Fureby C (1998). A tensorial approach to computational continuum mechanics using object-oriented techniques. Computers in Physics, 12: 620–631.
Zhang R, Lam K, Yao S-C, Zhang Y (2013). Coupled EnergyPlus and computational fluid dynamics simulation for natural ventilation. Building and Environment, 68: 100–113.
Acknowledgements
This paper represents a part of the work achieved during the PhD study of the first author, which was funded by the Erasmus Mundus ELEMENT Scholarship (Egypt-Lebanon-EU Mobility Exchange NeTwork).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
12273_2019_530_MOESM1_ESM.pdf
Simulation of the thermal performance of a geometrically complex Double-Skin Facade for hot climates: EnergyPlus vs. OpenFOAM
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
El Ahmar, S., Battista, F. & Fioravanti, A. Simulation of the thermal performance of a geometrically complex Double-Skin Facade for hot climates: EnergyPlus vs. OpenFOAM. Build. Simul. 12, 781–795 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-019-0530-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-019-0530-8