Abstract
The purpose of this study is to identify effective methods of improving the condensation resistance and thermal insulation performance of triple-glazed windows. These improvements should satisfy the required temperature difference ratio (TDR) of the Design Standard for Preventing Condensation in Apartment Buildings and the required thermal transmittance (U-factor) of the Construction Standards for Energy-Efficient Green Homes. In apartment buildings, various alternatives were selected for tilt-and-turn triple-glazed windows that directly face the exterior. The TDR was calculated using a three-dimensional heat transfer simulation performed with TRISCO (Physibel, Belgium), and the U-factor was calculated after the Window/Therm simulation. Under the same glazing composition, compared with Case 1 with an aluminum spacer, Case 2 with a TPS; thermal insulation spacer showed a 19.5% lower TDR on average, and Case 3 with a TPS and a 5-mm extended glazing overlap height of the frame exhibited a 23.4% lower TDR on average, thereby verifying that the condensation resistance performance was improved. The application of thermal insulation spacers is essential along with the extended glazing overlap height of the frame for satisfying the required TDR criteria of region III and above. Among the 16 alternatives that met the region II criteria of the design standard, two alternatives met the required mid region U-factor criteria of the construction standards, and 12 alternatives met the required southern region U-factor criteria. As a result, the most effective alternatives for satisfying the required TDR and U-factor of Korean design standards were outlined.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Boyano A, Hernandez P, Wolf O (2013). Energy demands and potential savings in European office buildings: Case studies based on EnergyPlus simulations. Energy and Buildings, 65: 19–28.
BSI (2011). BS EN 673 Glass in building—Determination of thermal transmittance (U value)—Calculation method. London: British Standards Institution.
Carlos JS (2016). The impact of thermal mass on cold and hot climate zones of Portugal. Indoor and Built Environment, 26: 733–743.
Cho W, Iwamoto S, Kato S (2016). Condensation risk due to variations in airtightness and thermal insulation of an office building in warm and wet climate. Energies, 9(12): 875.
Ewha Womans University (2016). Report for development of building technology to improve the living performance closely related with lifestyle to realize the housing welfare. (in Korean)
Gläser HJ, Ulrich S (2013). Condensation on the outdoor surface of window glazing—Calculation methods, key parameters and prevention with low-emissivity coatings. Thin Solid Films, 532: 127–131.
ISO (2003). ISO 15099. Thermal performance of windows, doors and shading devices—Detailed calculations. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.
ISO (2017). ISO 10077-2. Thermal performance of windows, doors and shutters—Calculation of thermal transmittance Part 2: Numerical method for frames. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.
Kim MH, Park SH, Koo SY, Lim JH, and Song SY (2016). Comparison of surface thermal resistance conditions for the condensation resistance assessment of windows using simulation. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, 32(10): 113–120. (in Korean)
Koo SY, Park S, Song JH, Song SY (2018). Effect of surface thermal resistance on the simulation accuracy of the condensation risk assessment for a high-performance window. Energies, 11(2): 382.
KS (2004). KS F 2295, Test method for dew condensation for windows and doors. Korea Standard. (in Korean)
KS (2014). KS F 2278, Standard test method for thermal resistance for windows and doors. Korea Standard. (in Korean)
LBNL (2013). Window/Therm 6.3 User Manual. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
MOLIT (2016). Design Standard for Preventing Condensation in Apartment Buildings. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport. (in Korean)
MOLIT (2017a). Energy-Saving Design Standards for Buildings. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport. (in Korean)
MOLIT (2017b). The Construction Standards for Energy-Efficient Green Home. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport. (in Korean)
MOLIT (2018). Housing Act. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport. (in Korean)
MTIE (2018). The Efficiency Management Equipment Operation Regulations. Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy. (in Korean)
NFRC (2017). Procedure for Determining Fenestration Product U-factors. NFRC 100–2017. Greenbelt, MD, USA: National Fenestration Rating Council.
Pan Y, Zuo M, Wu G (2011). Whole building energy simulation and energy saving potential analysis of a large public building. Journal of Building Performance Simulation, 4: 37–47.
Park S, Koo SY, Lim JH, Seong YB, Song SY (2016). Condensation resistance evaluation of a double-sliding window system for apartment buildings, Procedia Engineering, 146: 60–68.
Physibel (2010). TRISCO Manual of Version 12.0. gent Belgium: Physibel Software.
Passivhaus (2015). Criteria and Algorithms for Certified Passive House Components: Opaque construction systems. Darmstadt, Germany: Passivhaus Institut.
Shin MS, Rhee KN, Yu JY, Jung GJ (2017). Determination of equivalent thermal conductivity of window spacers in consideration of condensation prevention and energy saving performance. Energies, 10(5): 717.
Song SY, Lim AR, Song JH, Lim JH, Lee KN, Kim YT (2012). Design criteria for preventing inside surface condensation on the curtain wall systems of office buildings. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, 28: 383–392. (in Korean)
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by a grant (19RERPB082204-06) from the Residential Environmental Research Program funded by the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, and Transport of the Korean government.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Park, S., Song, SY. Thermally improved triple-glazing windows considering the condensation resistance (TDR) and thermal transmittance (U-factor) to meet Korean standards. Build. Simul. 12, 87–98 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-018-0496-y
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-018-0496-y