Skip to main content
Log in

Flow field around a surface-mounted cubic building with louver blinds

  • Research Article
  • Building Thermal, Lighting, and Acoustics Modeling
  • Published:
Building Simulation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Louver blinds are commonly used in building designs to avoid excessive solar radiation in an indoor environment, particularly for buildings with highly glazed facades. However, little attention has been given to their impact on flow field and pressure distribution around a building, which is crucial for predicting convective heat transfer, pollutant dispersion, and indoor ventilation. Therefore, the present study combined a wind-tunnel experiment with computational fluid dynamics simulations to study a wind velocity profile, flow field patterns, and surface pressure around a cubic building with louver blinds. The louver blinds move windward flow separation in an upward direction and extend the recirculation region of a roof; moreover, some subvortices are generated between the two adjacent louver slats. Louver angle φ, installing distance W, and slat width B severely affect the generation of subvortices between slats and a conical vortex on the roof. Subsequently, blinds with different φ, W, and B exhibit different pressure distributions on the windward surface and top surface of a building.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Argiriou AA, Balaras CA, Lykoudis SP (2002). Single-sided ventilation of buildings through shaded large openings. Energy, 27: 93–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ASHRAE (2009). ASHRAE Handbook: Fundamentals (SI). Atlanta: American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-conditioning Engineers.

    Google Scholar 

  • ANSYS (2013). ANSYS Fluent 14.0: Theory Guide. Canonsburg, USA: ANSYS Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun AL, Awruch AM (2009). Aerodynamic and aeroelastic analyses on the CAARC standard tall building model using numerical simulation. Computers & Structures, 87: 564–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castro IP, Robins AG (1977). The flow around a surface-mounted cube in uniform and turbulent streams. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 79: 307–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chand I, Bhargava PK, Krishak NLV (1998). Effect of balconies on ventilation inducing aeromotive force on low-rise buildings. Building and Environment, 33: 385–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins M, Tasnim S, Wright J (2009). Numerical analysis of convective heat transfer in fenestration with between-the-glass louvered shades. Building and Environment, 44: 2185–2192.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cuevas C, Fissore A, Fonseca N (2010). Natural convection at an indoor glazing surface with different window blinds. Energy and Buildings, 42: 1685–1691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cui PY, Li Z, Tao WQ (2014). Investigation of Re-independence of turbulent flow and pollutant dispersion in urban street canyon using numerical wind tunnel (NWT) models. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 79: 176–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cui PY, Li Z, Tao WQ (2016). Buoyancy flows and pollutant dispersion through different scale urban areas: CFD simulations and windtunnel measurements. Building and Environment, 104: 76–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalal R, Naylor D, Roeleveld D (2009). A CFD study of convection in a double glazed window with an enclosed pleated blind. Energy and Buildings, 41: 1256–1262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franke J, Hellsten A, Schlünzen H, Carissimo B (2007). Best practice guideline for the CFD simulation of flows in the urban environment. COST Action 732: Quality Assurance and Improvement of Microscale Meteorological Models. Hamburg, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hien WN, Istiadji AD A (2003). Effects of external shading devices on daylighting and natural ventilation. In: Proceedings of the 8th International IBPSA Building Simulation Conference, Edinhoven, the Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu J, Xuan HB, Kwok KCS, Zhang Y, Yu Y (2018). Study of wind flow over a 6 m cube using improved delayed detached Eddy simulation. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 179: 463–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang S, Li QS, Xu S (2007). Numerical evaluation of wind effects on a tall steel building by CFD. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 63: 612–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang P, Tao L, Gu M, Quan Y (2018). Experimental study of wind loads on gable roofs of low-rise buildings with overhangs. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 12: 300–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimura I, Hosoda T (2003). A non-linear k–ε model with realizability for prediction of flows around bluff bodies. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 42: 813–837.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Koffi J, El Mankibi M, Gourdon E, Issoglio R (2015). Assessment of single-sided ventilation with acoustic shutters on windows. Building Simulation, 8: 689–700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee DS, Kim SJ, Cho YH, Jo JH (2015). Experimental study for wind pressure loss rate through exterior venetian blind in cross ventilation. Energy and Buildings, 107: 123–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levitan ML, Mehta KC, Vann WP, Holmes JD (1991). Field measurements of pressures on the Texas tech building. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 38: 227–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li L, Qu M, Peng S (2016). Performance evaluation of building integrated solar thermal shading system: Building energy consumption and daylight provision. Energy and Buildings, 113: 189–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Machin AD, Naylor D, Harrison SJ, Oosthuizen PH (1998). Experimental study of free convection at an indoor glazing surface with a venetian blind. HVAC & R Research, 4: 153–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinuzzi R, Tropea C (1993). The flow around surface-mounted, prismatic obstacles placed in a fully developed channel flow. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 115: 85–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montazeri H, Blocken B (2013). CFD simulation of wind-induced pressure coefficients on buildings with and without balconies: Validation and sensitivity analysis. Building and Environment, 60: 137–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mu D, Gao NP, Zhu T (2016). Wind tunnel tests of inter-flat pollutant transmission characteristics in a rectangular multi-storey residential building, part A: Effect of wind direction. Building and Environment, 108: 159–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murakami S, Kato S, Akabayashi S, Mizutani K, Kim Y (1991). Wind tunnel test on velocity-pressure field of cross-ventilation with open windows. ASHRAE Transactions, 97(1): 525–538.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura H, Igarashi T, Tsutsui T (2001). Local heat transfer around a wall-mounted cube in the turbulent boundary layer. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 44: 3385–3395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Obasaju ED (1992). Measurement of forces and base overturning moments on the CAARC tall building model in a simulated atmospheric boundary layer. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 40: 103–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Sullivan PD, Kolokotroni M (2017). A field study of wind dominant single sided ventilation through a narrow slotted architectural louvre system. Energy and Buildings, 138: 733–747.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmero-Marrero AI, Oliveira AC (2010). Effect of louver shading devices on building energy requirements. Applied Energy, 87: 2040–2049.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richards PJ, Hoxey RP (2001). Unsteady flow on the sides of a 6m cube. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 90: 1855–1866.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richards PJ, Hoxey RP, Connell B D, Lander DP (2007). Wind-tunnel modelling of the Silsoe Cube. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 95: 1384–1399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shih T-H, Liou WW, Shabbir A, Yang Z, Zhu J (1995). A new k–ε eddy viscosity model for high Reynolds number turbulent flows. Computers and Fluids, 24: 227–238.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Stathopoulos T, Zhu X (1988). Wind pressures on building with appurtenances. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 31: 265–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tominaga Y, Mochida A,, Yoshie R, Kataoka H, Nozu T, Yoshikawa M, Shirasawa T (2008). AIJ guidelines for practical applications of CFD to pedestrian wind environment around buildings. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 96: 1749–1761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsuchiya M, Murakami S, Mochida A, Kondo K, Ishida Y (1997). Development of a new k-ε model for flow and pressure fields around bluff body. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 67–68: 169–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uribe D, Bustamante W, Vera S (2018). Potential of perforated exterior louvers to improve the comfort and energy performance of an office. Building Simulation, 11: 695–708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vera S, Uribe D, Bustamante W, Molina G (2016). Optimization of a fixed exterior complex fenestration system considering visual comfort and energy performance criteria. Building and Environment, 113: 163–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfshtein M (1969). The velocity and temperature distribution in one-dimensional flow with turbulence augmentation and pressure gradient. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 12: 301–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng Z, Li X, Li C, Zhu Y (2012). Modeling ventilation in naturally ventilated double-skin facade with a venetian blind. Building and Environment, 57: 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Z, Bejan A, Lage JL (1991). Natural convection in a vertical enclosure with internal permeable screen. Journal of Heat transfer, 113: 377–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This project was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.51578385).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhengrong Li.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jiang, F., Li, Z., Zhao, Q. et al. Flow field around a surface-mounted cubic building with louver blinds. Build. Simul. 12, 141–151 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-018-0493-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-018-0493-1

Keywords

Navigation