Advertisement

Building Simulation

, Volume 11, Issue 4, pp 803–817 | Cite as

Improving occupant-related features in building performance simulation tools

  • Mohamed M. Ouf
  • William O’Brien
  • H. Burak Gunay
Research Article Architecture and Human Behavior
  • 95 Downloads

Abstract

Despite the research advances and demonstrated benefit of occupant modelling and simulation in recent years, its uptake in building simulation practice has been relatively slow. One of the underlying causes of this issue is limited occupant-related features of building performance simulation (BPS) tools. To this end, we present a detailed breakdown of occupant-related features and compare them between common BPS tools. Based on the outcomes of a stakeholder workshop, and an international survey that focused on occupant modelling, we provide detailed recommendations to improve occupant-related features in BPS tools. We finally present a case study demonstrating the suggested occupant-related features to apply multiple occupancy assumptions, and integrate occupant behaviour models from the literature. Results are presented as part of a non-functional mock-up graphical user interface (GUI) to demonstrate potential features of BPS tools given the suggested occupant-related improvements. These suggested improvements for BPS tools would enable users to quickly assess proposed designs’ sensitivity to different occupancy scenarios, and ultimately increase the robustness of their final designs. The presented recommendations are relevant to practitioners, researchers, and BPS tool developers as part of the efforts to increase the uptake of detailed occupant modelling in building simulation practice.

Keywords

building performance simulation occupancy occupant behaviour building simulation software tools occupant modelling 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by Natural Resources Canada (NRCan), under the Clean Energy Innovation (CEI) component of the Energy Innovation Program (EIP). The workshop was funded by Natural Science and Engineering Research Council (NSERC). The authors would also like to thank the workshop participants for devoting over a day of their time to travel to Ottawa to provide valuable input to workshop.

References

  1. ASHRAE (2013). ASHRAE Standard 90.1-2013, Energy Standard for Buildings Except Low-Rise Residential Buildings. Atlanta: American Society of Heating Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers.Google Scholar
  2. ASHRAE (2017). ASHRAE Standard 55–2017, Thermal Environmental Conditions for Human Occupancy. Atlanta: American Society of Heating Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers.Google Scholar
  3. Bennet IE, O’Brien W, Gunay HB (2014). Effect of window blind use in residential buildings: Observation and simulation study. In: Proceedings of eSim Conference, Ottawa, Canada.Google Scholar
  4. Bennet IE, O’Brien W (2017). Office building plug and light loads: Comparison of a multi-tenant office tower to conventional assumptions. Energy and Buildings, 153: 461–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berglund L (1978). Mathematical models for predicting the thermal comfort response of building occupants. ASHRAE Transactions, 84(1): 735–749.Google Scholar
  6. Carlucci S (2013). Thermal Comfort Assessment of Buildings. London: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clarke JA, Hensen JLM (2015). Integrated building performance simulation: Progress, prospects and requirements. Building and Environment, 91: 294–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Constantine LL, Lockwood LAD (2002). Usage-centered engineering for Web applications. IEEE Software, 19(2): 42–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cowie A, Hong T, Feng X, Darakdjian Q (2017). Usefulness of the obFMU module examined through a review of occupant modelling functionality in building performance simulation programs. In: Proceedings of IBPSA International Building Simulation Conference, San Francisco, USA.Google Scholar
  10. da Silva PC, Leal V, Andersen M (2015). Occupants’ behaviour in energy simulation tools: lessons from a field monitoring campaign regarding lighting and shading control. Journal of Building Performance Simulation, 8: 338–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. D’Oca S, Hong T (2014). A data-mining approach to discover patterns of window opening and closing behavior in offices. Building and Environment, 82: 726–739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Djunaedy V, Wymelenberg K, Acker B, Thimmanna H (2011). Rightsizing: Using simulation tools to solve the problem of oversizing. In: Proceedings of IBPSA International Building Simulation Conference, Sydney, Australia.Google Scholar
  13. Feng X, Yan D, Hong T (2015). Simulation of occupancy in buildings. Energy and Buildings, 87: 348–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gill ZM, Tierney MJ, Pegg IM, Allan N (2010). Low-energy dwellings: The contribution of behaviours to actual performance. Building Research and Information, 38: 491–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gunay HB, O’Brien W, Beausoleil-Morrison I (2013). A critical review of observation studies, modeling, and simulation of adaptive occupant behaviors in offices. Building and Environment, 70: 31–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gunay HB, O’Brien W, Beausoleil-Morrison I (2016). Implementation and comparison of existing occupant behaviour models in EnergyPlus. Journal of Building Performance Simulation, 9: 567–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gunay HB, O’Brien W, Beausoleil-Morrison I, Bursill J (2017). Development and implementation of a thermostat learning algorithm. Science and Technology for the Built Environment, 4731: 1–14.Google Scholar
  18. Haldi F, Robinson D (2010). Adaptive actions on shading devices in response to local visual stimuli. Journal of Building Performance Simulation, 3: 135–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Haldi F, Robinson D (2011). The impact of occupants’ behaviour on building energy demand. Journal of Building Performance Simulation, 4: 323–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Harris D, Higgins C (2013). Methodology for Reporting Commercial Office Plug Load Energy Use. New Buildings Institute. Available at https://newbuildings.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/PlugLoad MetricsReportingGuide_CaseStudy1.pdf.Google Scholar
  21. Hong T, D’Oca S, Turner WJN, Taylor-Lange SC (2015a). An ontology to represent energy-related occupant behavior in buildings. Part I: Introduction to the DNAs framework. Building and Environment, 92: 764–777.Google Scholar
  22. Hong T, D’Oca S, Taylor-Lange SC, Turner WJN, Chen Y, Corgnati SP (2015b) An ontology to represent energy-related occupant behavior in buildings. Part II: Implementation of the DNAS framework using an XML schema. Building and Environment, 94: 196–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hong T, Sun H, Chen Y, Taylor-Lange SC, Yan D (2016). An occupant behavior modeling tool for co-simulation. Energy and Buildings, 117: 272–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hong T, Chen Y, Belafi Z, D’Oca S (2018). Occupant behavior models: A critical review of implementation and representation approaches in building performance simulation programs. Building Simulation, 11: 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lindner AJM, Park S, Mitterhofer M (2017). Determination of requirements on occupant behavior models for the use in building performance simulations. Building Simulation, 10: 861–874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. NRC (2015). National Energy Code of Canada for Buildings. Canadian Commission on Building and Fire Codes, Ottawa: National Research Council of Canada.Google Scholar
  27. Nghiem T (2010). MLE+: A Matlab-EnergyPlus Co-simulation Interface. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
  28. Norford LK, Socolow RH, Hsieh ES, Spadaro GV (1994). Two-to-one discrepancy between measured and predicted performance of a “low-energy” office building: insights from a reconciliation based on the DOE-2 model. Energy and Buildings, 21: 121–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. O’Brien W, Gunay HB (2014). The contextual factors contributing to occupants’ adaptive comfort behaviors in offices—A review and proposed modeling framework. Building and Environment, 77: 77–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. O’Brien W, Gunay HB (2015). Mitigating office performance uncertainty of occupant use of window blinds and lighting using robust design. Building Simulation, 8: 621–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. O’Brien W, Bennet I (2016). Simulation-based evaluation of high-rise residential building thermal resilience. ASHRAE Transactions, 122(1): 455–468.Google Scholar
  32. O’Brien W, Gaetani I, Carlucci S, Hoes P-J, Hensen JLM (2017a). On occupant-centric building performance metrics. Building and Environment, 122: 373–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. O’Brien W, Gaetani I, Gilani S, Carlucci S, Hoes P-J, Hensen J (2017b). International survey on current occupant modelling approaches in building performance simulation. Journal of Building Performance Simulation, 10: 653–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. O’Brien W, Gunay HB, Tahmasebi F, Mahdavi A (2017c). A preliminary study of representing the inter-occupant diversity in occupant modelling. Journal of Building Performance Simulation, 10: 509–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Page J, Robinson D, Morel N, Scartezzini JL (2008). A generalised stochastic model for the simulation of occupant presence. Energy and Buildings, 40: 83–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Reinhart CF (2004). Lightswitch-2002: A model for manual and automated control of electric lighting and blinds. Solar Energy, 77: 15–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Roth A, Goldwasser D, Parker A (2016). There’s a measure for that! Energy and Buildings, 117: 321–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Schiavon S, Lee KH (2013). Dynamic predictive clothing insulation models based on outdoor air and indoor operative temperatures. Building and Environment, 59: 250–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wang D, Federspiel CC, Rubinstein F (2005). Modeling occupancy in single person offices. Energy and Buildings, 37: 121–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wang C, Yan D, Jiang Y (2011). A novel approach for building occupancy simulation. Building Simulation, 4: 149–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wang H, Zhai Z (2016). Advances in building simulation and computational techniques: A review between 1987 and 2014. Energy and Buildings, 128: 319–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wetter M (2008). A modular building controls virtual test bed for the integrations of heterogeneous systems. In: Proceedings of SimBuild. Berkeley, CA, USA.Google Scholar
  43. Yan D, O’Brien W, Hong T, Feng X, Gunay HB, Tahmasebi F, Mahdavi A (2015). Occupant behavior modeling for building performance simulation: Current state and future challenges. Energy and Buildings, 107: 264–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Tsinghua University Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mohamed M. Ouf
    • 1
  • William O’Brien
    • 1
  • H. Burak Gunay
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringCarleton UniversityOttawaCanada

Personalised recommendations