Advertisement

Building Simulation

, Volume 11, Issue 4, pp 625–631 | Cite as

Cooling energy saving associated with exterior greenery systems for three US Department of Energy (DOE) standard reference buildings

  • Shaojie Yuan
  • Donghyun Rim
Research Article Building Thermal, Lighting, and Acoustics Modeling

Abstract

Exterior greenery systems such as green walls and green roof can provide energy saving and environmental benefits. Several previous studies examined thermal impacts of green roof/walls on a test envelope or simplified buildings in local climates. However, few studies examined the effects of exterior greenery systems considering building types, air conditioning operating conditions, and wall orientations in varied climates. The objective of this study is to investigate cooling energy savings associated with exterior greenery systems for the US Department of Energy (DOE) standard reference buildings, depending on building type, wall orientation, and local climate. Hourly energy consumption was examined for three types of reference buildings: (1) medium office, (2) hospital, and (3) primary school. For the three reference buildings, hourly solar radiation and latent heat transfer rates were calculated for four representative local climates (i.e., hot-dry, hot-humid, cold-humid, and warm-dry). Results show that latent heat transfer due to plant transpiration can dominate heat transfer through the exterior greenery systems. Among the four climates studied herein, heat removal due to evaporation by green walls and roof over the summer months (June to August) is the largest (up to 680 kWh/m2) in Phoenix, while it is in similar range (300–350 kWh/m2) for green walls and roof in other cities. Building type also has notable impacts on the energy performance of the exterior greenery system. Primary school achieves the most significant cooling energy saving in all climates because of high envelope heat gains compared to medium office and hospital. For the primary school in Phoenix, annual cooling energy saving can be maximized up to 27,000 kWh/y with green walls and up to 69,000 kWh/y with a green roof. Latent heat transfer due to evaporation is similar (< 6%) between south and west green walls, implying that utilizing a west green wall could be a good alternative or complement to using a south green wall for cooling energy saving.

Keywords

green wall green roof commercial buildings EnergyPlus reference buildings 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by The Raymond A Bowers Program for Excellence in Design and Construction of the Built Environment from The Pennsylvania State University.

Supplementary material

12273_2018_427_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (1.6 mb)
Cooling energy saving associated with exterior greenery systems for three US Department of Energy (DOE) standard reference buildings

References

  1. Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M (1998). Crop evapotranspiration— Guidelines for computing crop water requirements—FAO Irrigation and drainage paper 56. FAO, Rome, 300(9), D05109.Google Scholar
  2. ASHRAE (2004). ANSI/ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1-2004. Energy Standard for Buildings Except Low-rise Residential Buildings. Atlanta, GA, USA: American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers.Google Scholar
  3. Balaras CA (1996). The role of thermal mass on the cooling load of buildings. An overview of computational methods. Energy and Buildings, 24: 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berghage RD, Beattie D, Jarrett AR, Thuring C, Razaei F, O’Connor TP (2009). Green roofs for stormwater runoff control. Available at http://nepis.epa.gov/exe/zu[ir;/cgi?dockey=p1003704.txt2009.Google Scholar
  5. Briggs RS, Lucas RG, Taylor ZT (2003). Climate classification for building energy codes and standards: Part 2—Zone definitions, maps, and comparisons. ASHRAE Transactions, 109(1): 122–130.Google Scholar
  6. Cameron RWF, Taylor JE, Emmett MR (2014). What’s ‘cool’ in the world of green façades? How plant choice influences the cooling properties of green walls. Building and Environment, 73: 198–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carlos JS (2015). Simulation assessment of living wall thermal performance in winter in the climate of Portugal. Building Simulation, 8: 3–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Coma J, Pérez G, Solé C, Castell A, Cabeza LF (2014). New green facades as passive systems for energy savings on buildings. Energy Procedia, 57: 1851–1859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Deru M, Field K, Studer D, Benne K, Griffith B, et al. (2011). US Department of Energy commercial reference building models of the national building stock. Technical Report NREL/TP-5500-46861. Golden, CO, USA: National Renewable Energy Laboratory.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Djedjig R, Bozonnet E, Belarbi R (2015). Analysis of thermal effects of vegetated envelopes: Integration of a validated model in a building energy simulation program. Energy and Buildings, 86: 93–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Feng H, Hewage K (2014). Energy saving performance of green vegetation on LEED certified buildings. Energy and Buildings, 75: 281–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Getter KL, Rowe DB (2006). The role of extensive green roofs in sustainable development. HortScience, 41: 1276–1285.Google Scholar
  13. Hoelscher MT, Nehls T, Jänicke B, Wessolek G (2016). Quantifying cooling effects of facade greening: Shading, transpiration and insulation. Energy and Buildings, 114: 283–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jim CY (2014). Heat-sink effect and indoor warming imposed by tropical extensive green roof. Ecological Engineering, 62: 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kontoleon KJ, Eumorfopoulou EA (2010). The effect of the orientation and proportion of a plant-covered wall layer on the thermal performance of a building zone. Building and Environment, 45: 1287–1303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lehmann S (2014). Low carbon districts: Mitigating the urban heat island with green roof infrastructure. City, Culture and Society, 5: 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lin YJ, Lin HT (2011). Thermal performance of different planting substrates and irrigation frequencies in extensive tropical rooftop greeneries. Building and Environment, 46: 345–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Malys L, Musy M, Inard C (2014). A hydrothermal model to assess the impact of green walls on urban microclimate and building energy consumption. Building and Environment, 73: 187–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ottelé M, Perini K, Fraaij ALA, Haas EM, Raiteri R (2011). Comparative life cycle analysis for green façades and living wall systems. Energy and Buildings, 43: 3419–3429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pérez G, Rincón L, Vila A, González JM, Cabeza LF (2011). Green vertical systems for buildings as passive systems for energy savings. Applied Energy, 88: 4854–4859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Perini K, Rosasco P (2013). Cost-benefit analysis for green façades and living wall systems. Building and Environment, 70: 110–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rim D, Schiavon S, Nazaroff WW (2015). Energy and cost associated with ventilating office buildings in a tropical climate. PLoS ONE, 10(3): e0122310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sailor DJ (2008). A green roof model for building energy simulation programs. Energy and Buildings, 40: 1466–1478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Susorova I, Angulo M, Bahrami P, Stephens B (2013). A model of vegetated exterior facades for evaluation of wall thermal performance. Building and Environment, 67: 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. EIA (2012). Use of energy—In commercial buildings. U.S. Energy Information Administration, Available at http://www.eia.gov/ Energyexplained/?page=us_energy_commercial. Accessed 23 Feb 2017.Google Scholar
  26. Veisten K, Smyrnova Y, Klæboe R, Hornikx M, Mosslemi M, Kang J (2012). Valuation of green walls and green roofs as soundscape measures: Including monetised amenity values together with noise-attenuation values in a cost-benefit analysis of a green wall affecting courtyards. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 9: 3770–3788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wong NH, Cheong DKW, Yan H, Soh J, Ong CL, Sia A (2003). The effects of rooftop garden on energy consumption of a commercial building in Singapore. Energy and Buildings, 35: 353–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wong NH, Tan AYK, Chen Y, Sekar K, Tan PY, et al. (2010). Thermal evaluation of vertical greenery systems for building walls. Building and Environment, 45: 663–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wong I, Baldwin AN (2016). Investigating the potential of applying vertical green walls to high-rise residential buildings for energysaving in sub-tropical region. Building and Environment, 97: 34–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Yaghoobian N, Srebric J (2015). Influence of plant coverage on the total green roof energy balance and building energy consumption. Energy and Buildings, 103: 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Tsinghua University Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Architectural Engineering DepartmentPennsylvania State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations