Skip to main content
Log in

An improved explicit scheme for whole-building hygrothermal simulation

  • Research Article
  • Building Thermal, Lighting, and Acoustics Modeling
  • Published:
Building Simulation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Implicit schemes require important sub-iterations when dealing with highly nonlinear problems such as the combined heat and moisture transfer through porous building elements. The computational cost rises significantly when the whole-building is simulated, especially when there is important coupling among the building elements themselves with neighbouring zones and with HVAC (heating ventilation and air conditioning) systems. On the other hand, the classical Euler explicit scheme is generally not used because its stability condition imposes very fine time discretisation. Hence, this paper explores the use of an improved explicit approach—the DuFort–Frankel scheme—to overcome the disadvantage of the classical explicit one and to bring benefits that cannot be obtained by implicit methods. The DuFort–Frankel approach is first compared to the classical Euler implicit and explicit schemes to compute the solution of nonlinear heat and moisture transfer through porous materials. Then, the analysis of the DuFort–Frankel unconditionally stable explicit scheme is extended to the coupled heat and moisture balances on the scale of a one- and a two-zone building models. The DuFort–Frankel scheme has the benefits of being unconditionally stable, second-order accurate in time O(Δt2) and to compute explicitly the solution at each time step, avoiding costly sub-iterations. This approach may reduce the computational cost by twenty as well as it may enable perfect synchronism for whole-building simulation and co-simulation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barbosa RM, Mendes N (2008). Combined simulation of central HVAC systems with a whole-building hygrothermal model. Energy and Buildings, 40: 276–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauklimatik-Dresden (2011). Simulation program for the calculation of coupled heat, moisture, air, pollutant, and salt transport. Available at http://www.bauklimatik-dresden.de/delphin/index. php?aLa=en.

  • Berger J, Guernouti S, Woloszyn M, Chinesta F (2015). Proper generalised decomposition for heat and moisture multizone modelling. Energy and Buildings, 105: 334–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger J, Mazuroski W, Mendes N, Guernouti S, Woloszyn M (2016). 2D whole-building hygrothermal simulation analysis based on a PGD reduced order model. Energy and Buildings, 112: 49–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burch D (1993). An analysis of moisture accumulation in walls subjected to hot and humid climates. ASHRAE Transactions, 99(2): 1013–1022.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dos Santos GH, Mendes N (2004). Analysis of numerical methods and simulation time step effects on the prediction of building thermal performance. Applied Thermal Engineering, 24: 1129–1142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dos Santos GH, Mendes N (2006). Simultaneous heat and moisture transfer in soils combined with building simulation. Energy and Buildings, 38: 303–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Driscoll TA, Hale N, Trefethen LN (2014). Chebfun Guide. Oxford, UK: Pafnuty Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraunhofer IBP (2005). Wufi. Available at http://www.hoki.ibp.fhg.de/wufi/wufi_frame_e.html.

  • Gasparin S, Berger J, Dutykh D, Mendes N (2017). Stable explicit schemes for simulation of nonlinear moisture transfer in porous materials. Journal of Building Performance Simulation, doi: 10.1080/ 19401493.2017.1298669.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagentoft C-E, Kalagasidis AS, Adl-Zarrabi B, Roels S, Carmeliet J, et al. (2004). Assessment method of numerical prediction models for combined heat, air and moisture transfer in building components: Benchmarks for one-dimensional cases. Journal of Thermal Envelope and Building Science, 27: 327–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hensen J (1995). Modelling coupled heat and air flow: Ping-pong vs onions. In: Proceedings of Implementing the Results of Ventilation Research 16th AIVC Conference, Palm Springs, US, pp. 253–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janssen H (2014). Simulation efficiency and accuracy of different moisture transfer potentials. Journal of Building Performance Simulation, 7: 379–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janssen H, Blocken B, Carmeliet J (2007). Conservative modelling of the moisture and heat transfer in building components under atmospheric excitation. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 50: 1128–1140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahan W, Palmer J (1979). On a proposed floating-point standard. ACM SIGNUM Newsletter, 14: 13–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalagasidis AS, Weitzmann P, Nielsen TR, Peuhkuri R, Hagentoft C-E, Rode C (2007). The international building physics toolbox in Simulink. Energy and Buildings, 39: 665–674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matlab (2014). The MathWorks Inc. Available at https://www. mathworks.com.

  • Mendes N (1997). Models for prediction of heat and moisture transfer through porous building elements. PhD Thesis, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Brazil. (in Portuguese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendes N, Philippi PC (2005). A method for predicting heat and moisture transfer through multilayered walls based on temperature and moisture content gradients. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 48: 37–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mendes N, Ridley I, Lamberts R, Philippi P, Budag K (1999), Umidus: A PC program for the prediction of heat and mass transfer in porous building elements. In: Proceedings of the 6th International IBPSA Building Simulation Conference, Kyoto, Japan, pp. 277–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nayfeh A (2000). Perturbation Methods. Weinheim, Germany: Wiley VCH.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Richtmyer R, Morton KW (1967). Difference Methods for Initial-Value Problems. New York: Interscience Publishers.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rode C, Grau K (2003). Whole building hygrothermal simulation model. ASHRAE Transactions, 109(1): 572–582.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rouchier S, Woloszyn M, Foray G, Roux J-J (2013). Influence of concrete fracture on the rain infiltration and thermal performance of building facades. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 61: 340–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steeman H-J, Van Belleghem M, Janssens A, De Paepe M (2009). Coupled simulation of heat and moisture transport in air and porous materials for the assessment of moisture related damage. Building and Environment, 44: 2176–2184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tariku F, Kumaran K, Fazio P (2010). Transient model for coupled heat, air and moisture transfer through multilayered porous media. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 53: 3035–3044.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor PJ (1970). The stability of the Du Fort-Frankel method for the diffusion equation with boundary conditions involving space derivatives. The Computer Journal, 13: 92–97.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Van Genuchten M (1982). A comparison of numerical solutions of the one-dimensional unsaturated–saturated flow and transport equations. Advances in Water Resources, 5: 47–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woloszyn M, Rode C (2008). Tools for performance simulation of heat, air and moisture conditions of whole buildings. Building Simulation, 1: 5–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the Brazilian Agencies CAPES of the Ministry of Education and CNPQ of the Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation, for the financial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Suelen Gasparin.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gasparin, S., Berger, J., Dutykh, D. et al. An improved explicit scheme for whole-building hygrothermal simulation. Build. Simul. 11, 465–481 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-017-0419-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-017-0419-3

Keywords

Navigation