Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of CFD turbulence models for simulating external airflow around varied building roof with wind tunnel experiment

  • Research Article
  • Indoor/Outdoor Airflow and Air Quality
  • Published:
Building Simulation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Detailed airflow information around a building can be crucial for the design of naturally ventilated systems and for exhaust air dispersion practices in agricultural buildings like greenhouses and livestock buildings. Full-scale measurements are cost-intensive and difficult to achieve due to varied wind conditions. A common method to gain insight of flow field under different wind conditions is the numerical simulation by using computational fluid dynamics (CFD). Still, evaluation of a CFD models’ performance and validation of its predictions with high quality experimental data is necessary before the model is used in practice. In this research three types of common agricultural buildings, arched-type, pitched-type and flat-type roof, were examined by conducting experiments in a wind tunnel with controlled airflow conditions, in order to validate different 3D turbulence models for predicting airflow patterns. The focus of this work was the detailed description of the external airflow field over the varied roof geometries and especially the velocity distribution and turbulent kinetic energy in the wake of each building. Experimental measurements of velocity were performed with a Laser Doppler Anemometer (LDA) and were compared with 3D RANS turbulence models’ simulation results. A reasonable agreement was found between experimental and simulation results concerning the velocity and the turbulence kinetic energy with CFD models slightly underestimating these magnitudes. The k-ε series turbulence models and especially the standard k-ε, RNG k-ε and Realizable k-ε models presented good agreement concerning velocity contours; however, high prediction error occurred over the roof of the buildings compared to the average values.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ANSYS (2009). ANSYS FLUENT 12.0, Theory Guide. ANSYS Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartzanas T, Kittas C, Sapounas AA, Nikita-Martzopoulou C (2007). Analysis of airflow through experimental rural buildings: Sensitivity to turbulence models. Biosystems Engineering, 97: 229–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bournet PE, Boulard T (2010). Effect of ventilator configuration on the distributed climate of greenhouses: A review of experimental and CFD studies. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 74: 195–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CEN (2001). Comite Europeen de Normalisation, EN 13031-1-2001. Greenhouses: Design and construction Part 1: Commercial production greenhouses, Brussels, Belgium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dados JN, Fragos VP, Ntinas GK, Papoutsi-Psychoudaki S, Nikita-Martzopoulou C (2011). Numerical simulation of airflow over two successive tunnel greenhouses. International Agrophysics, 25: 333–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fragos VP, Psychoudaki SP, Malamataris NA (2010). Direct simulation of two-dimensional turbulent flow over a surface-mounted obstacle. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 55: 985–1018.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Franke J, Schlünzen H, Carissimo B (2007). Best practice guideline for the CFD simulation of flows in the urban environment. Cost Office, Brussels, Available at http://www.mi.uni-hamburg.de/afficial-Documents.5849.0.html.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilkeson CA, Thompson HM, Wilson MCT, Gaskell PH, Barnard RH (2009). An experimental and computational study of the aerodynamic and passive ventilation characteristics of small livestock trailers. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 97: 415–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu HH (2012). Computational fluid dynamics. In: Kundu PK, Cohen IM, Dowling DR (eds), Fluid Mechanics, Chapter 10, 5th edn. Waltham, MA, USA: Academic Press. pp. 421–472.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt A (1982). Wind-tunnel measurements of surface pressures on cubic building models at several scales. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 10: 137–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karava P, Stathopoulos T, Athienitis AK (2011). Airflow assessment in cross-ventilated buildings with operable façade elements. Building and Environment, 46: 266–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murakami S, Mochida A (1988). 3-D numerical simulation of airflow around a cubic model by means of the k-ε model. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 31: 283–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norton T, Sun DW, Grant J, Fallon R, Dodd V (2007). Applications of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) in the modelling and design of ventilation systems in the agricultural industry: A review. Bioresource Technology, 98: 2386–2414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ntinas GK, Zhang G, Fragos VP, Bochtis DD, Nikita-Martzopoulou Ch (2014). Airflow patterns around obstacles with arched and pitched roofs: Wind tunnel measurements and direct simulation. European Journal of Mechanics—B/Fluids, 43: 216–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramponi R, Blocken B (2012). CFD simulation of cross-ventilation for a generic isolated building: Impact of computational parameters. Building and Environment, 53: 34–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodi W (1997). Comparison of LES and RANS calculations of the flow around bluff bodies. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 69–71: 55–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen M, Hao F (2006). Steady state numerical simulation of airflow pattern in natural ventilated tunnel greenhouse. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 37(5): 101–105. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Stamou A, Katsiris I (2006). Verification of a CFD model for indoor airflow and heat transfer. Building and Environment, 41: 1171–1181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tamura T, Nozawa K, Kondo K (2008). AIJ guide for numerical prediction of wind loads on buildings. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 96: 1974–1984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tominaga Y, Stathopoulos T (2010). Numerical simulation of dispersion around an isolated cubic building: Model evaluation of RANS and LES. Building and Environment, 45: 2231–2239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tominaga Y, Akabayashi SI, Kitahara T, Arinami Y (2015). Air flow around isolated gable-roof buildings with different roof pitches: Wind tunnel experiments and CFD simulations. Building and Environment, 84: 204–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogiatzis II, Denizopoulou AC, Ntinas GK, Fragos VP (2014). Simulation analysis of air flow and turbulence statistics in a rib grit roughened duct. The Scientific World Journal, 2014: 791513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West GF, Apelt CJ (1982). The effects of tunnel blockage and aspect ratio on the mean flow past a circular cylinder with Reynolds numbers between 104 and 105. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 114: 361–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu W, Zhai J, Zhang G, Nielsen PV (2012). Evaluation of methods for determining air exchange rate in a naturally ventilated dairy cattle building with large openings using computational fluid dynamics (CFD). Atmospheric Environment, 63: 179–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yakhot V, Orszag SA, Thangam S, Gatski TB, Speziale CG (1992). Development of turbulence models for shear flows by a double expansion technique. Physics of Fluids A: Fluid Dynamics, 4: 1510–1520.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Yanaoka H, Inamura T, Kobayashi R (2007). Numerical simulation of separated flow transition and heat transfer around a twodimensional rib. Heat Transfer—Asian Research, 36: 513–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • You R, Chen J, Shi Z, Liu W, Lin C-H, Wei D, Chen Q (2016). Experimental and numerical study of airflow distribution in an aircraft cabin mock-up with a gasper on. Journal of Building Performance Simulation, 9: 555–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We appreciate the financial support by the National Key Project of the Ministry of Science and Technology, China, on “Green Buildings and Building Industrialization” through Grant No. 2016YFC0700500. The second author is grateful for the financial support of this research by National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (No. 51408413).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiong Shen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ntinas, G.K., Shen, X., Wang, Y. et al. Evaluation of CFD turbulence models for simulating external airflow around varied building roof with wind tunnel experiment. Build. Simul. 11, 115–123 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-017-0369-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-017-0369-9

Keywords

Navigation