Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A nZEB housing structure derived from end of life containers: Energy, lighting and life cycle assessment

  • Research Article
  • Building Thermal, Lighting, and Acoustics Modeling
  • Published:
Building Simulation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Directive 2010/31/EU is stimulating new approaches in building design process and renewable energies exploitation through the concept of nearly Zero Energy Buildings (nZEB). The paper reports an attempt of designing nearly zero energy buildings using end-of-life shipping containers named HPP, which can be used for emergency housing scopes, but also for forestries and low cost housing projects. These devices were analyzed from an energy, environmental and lighting point of view using respectively EnergyPlus, SimaPro and DIALux. For each case study, three different floor areas, i.e. 14 m2 (S type), 7 m2 (XS) and 5.6 m2 (XXS), and three wall coatings (Corten steel, Corian and wood) were considered. The key aspect of HPPs is the use of moving furniture attached to horizontal rails fixed on the ceilings; it allows to modify the room usage by changing the allocation of the indoor elements. Each HPP is equipped with PV modules and a rainwater recovering system. Energy demand of HPPs was simulated in unsteady regime taking into account thermal insulation of the envelope and HVAC system characteristics. Lighting systems were designed to guarantee adequate indoor illuminance values considering different furniture configurations and the effect of natural and artificial light. A cradle-to-grave Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of the HPP module was performed to assess the potential environmental impacts in terms of primary energy demand and greenhouse gas emissions. Sound insulation of one HPP configuration was also assessed. The simulations demonstrate that the HPP modules solution can be considered a nearly zero energy building and they are also able to guarantee a comfortable living not only for short-term periods, in particular the largest one.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abu Bakar NN, Hassan MY, Abdullah H, Rahman HA, Abdullah MP, Hussin F, Bandi M (2015). Energy efficiency index as an indicator for measuring building energy performance: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 44: 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahn B-L, Jang C-Y, Leigh S-B, Yoo S, Jeong H (2014). Effect of LED lighting on the cooling and heating loads in office buildings. Applied Energy, 113: 1484–1489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alam M, Singh H, Limbachiya MC (2011). Vacuum Insulation Panels (VIPs) for building construction industry—A review of the contemporary developments and future directions. Applied Energy 88: 3592–3602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Tamimi NA, Fadzil SFS, Mallya BL (2009). Improved illumination levels and energy savings by uplamping technology for office buildings. In: Proceedings of the 2009 International Association of Computer Science and Information Technology, Article number 5169423, pp. 598–603.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alzubaidi S, Soori PK (2012). Energy efficient lighting system design for Hospitals Diagnostic and Treatment Room—A case study. Journal of Light and Visual Environment, 36: 23–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ascione F, Bianco N, De Masi RF, Mauro GM, Musto M, Vanoli GP (2014). Experimental validation of a numerical code by thin film heat flux sensors for the resolution of thermal bridges in dynamic conditions. Applied Energy, 124: 213–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asdrubali F, Baldinelli G (2009). Theoretical modelling and experimental evaluation of the optical properties of glazing systems with selective films. Building Simulation, 2: 75–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asdrubali F, Baldassarri C, Fthenakis V (2013a). Life cycle analysis in the construction sector: Guiding the optimization of conventional Italian buildings. Energy and Buildings, 64: 73–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asdrubali F, Baldinelli G, Bianchi F (2013b). Influence of cavities geometric and emissivity properties on the overall thermal performance of aluminum frames for windows. Energy and Buildings, 60: 298–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asdrubali F, D’Alessandro F, Schiavoni S (2015). A review of unconventional sustainable building insulation materials. Sustainable Materials and Technologies, 4: 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asdrubali F, Schiavoni S, Horoshenkov K (2012). A review of sustainable materials for acoustic applications. Building Acoustics, 19: 283–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atmaca A, Atmaca N (2016). Comparative life cycle energy and cost analysis of post-disaster temporary housings. Applied Energy, 171: 429–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atmaca N (2016). Life-cycle assessment of post-disaster temporary housing. Building Research and information, doi: 10.1080/09613218.2015.1127116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldinelli G, Asdrubali F, Baldassarri C, Bianchi F, D’Alessandro F, Schiavoni S, Basilicata C (2014). Energy and environmental performance optimization of a wooden window: A holistic approach. Energy and Buildings, 79: 114–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldinelli G, Bonafoni S, Anniballe R, Presciutti A, Gioli B, Magliulo V (2015). Spaceborne detection of roof and impervious surface albedo: Potentialities and comparison with airborne thermography measurements. Solar Energy, 113: 281–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borelli D, Pittaluga I, Schenone C, Ghirlanda M, Stretti F (2015). Use of innovative composite materials and foams for noise control on board ships. In: Proceedings of 22nd International Congress on Sound and Vibration ICSV22, Florence, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carletti C, Sciurpi F, Pierangioli L, Adrubali F, Pisello AL, Bianchi F, Sambuco S, Guattari C (2016). Thermal and lighting effects of an external venetian blind: Experimental analysis in a full scale test room. Building and Environment, 106: 45–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chastas P, Theodosiou T, Bikas D (2016). Embodied energy in residential buildings-towards the nearly zero energy building: A literature review. Building and Environment, 105: 267–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi J-K, Kelley D, Murphy S, Thangamani D (2016). Economic and environmental perspectives of end-of-life ship management. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 107: 82–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Container City (2016). Container City. Available at http://www.containercity.com. Accessed 27 Jul 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawley DB, Hand JW, Kummert M, Griffith BT (2008). Contrasting the capabilities of building energy performance simulation programs. Building and Environment 43: 661–673.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Designboom (2016a). MMW architects: Shipping container art gallery. Available at http://www.designboom.com/architecture/mmwarchitects-shipping-container-art-gallery. Accessed 27 Jul 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Designboom (2016b). TOP 10 shipping container structures of 2013. Available at http://www.designboom.com/architecture/top-10-shipping-container-structures-of-2013-12-2-2013. Accessed 27 Jul 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • DesignBuilder (2016). DesignBuilder: Software description. Available at http://www.designbuilderusa.com. Accessed 27 Jul 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • DIALux (2016). DIALux: Software description. Available at http://www.dial.de/DIAL/en/dialux/archive/2012/april.html. Accessed 27 Jul 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • DIALux works (2016). Description of Lighting Designs Powered by DIALux. Available at https://dialuxworks.wordpress.com. Accessed 27 Jul 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • EU (2010). Directive 2010/31/EU of the European Parliament and of the council of 19 May 2010 on the energy performance of buildings.

    Google Scholar 

  • DIVISARE (2016). Cité à docks. Available at http://divisare.com/projects/199910-atelier-cattani-vincent-fillon-cite-a-docks. Accessed 27 Jul 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dumas A, Trancossi M, Madonia M, Coppola M (2014). Zero emission temporary habitation: A passive container house acclimatized by geothermal water. Journal of Solar Energy Engineering, 136(4): 044505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dupuis P, Barroso A, Canale L (2014). LED Lighting—Reduce the power consumption and increase the users comfort, In: Proceedings of 2014 IEEE Industry Application Society Annual Meeting, Vancouver, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ecoinvent Database (2007). Ecoinvent Database, version 2. Zürich: Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories.

    Google Scholar 

  • EnergyPlus (2016). Software description. Available at http://apps1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/energyplus/. Accessed 27 Jul 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • EC (2011). European Committee for Standardization EN 12464-1:2011, Light and Lighting—Lighting of Work Places—Part 1: Indoor Work Places.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eurostat (2012). Housing conditions. Available at http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Housing_conditions#Further_Eurostat_information. Accessed 27 Jul 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eurostat (2014). Freight transport statistics. Available at http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Freight_transport_statistics. Accessed 27 Jul 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabprefab (2016). LOT-EK MDU. Available at http://www.fabprefab.com/fabfiles/containerbay/059MDU-lotek/MDU-UCSB-newshome.htm. Accessed 27 Jul 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galli G, Vallati A, Recchiuti C, de Lieto Vollaro R, Botta F (2013). Passive cooling design options to improve thermal comfort in an urban district of Rome, under hot summer conditions. International Journal of Engineering and Technology, 5: 4495–4500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gugliermetti F, Bisegna F (2007). Saving energy in residential buildings: The use of fully reversible windows. Energy, 32: 1235–1247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammond GP, Jones CI (2008). Embodied energy and carbon in construction materials. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers—Energy, 161: 87–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hischier R, Weidema B, Althaus H-J, Bauer C, Doka G, Dones R, Frischknecht R, Hellweg S, Humbert S, Jungbluth N, Köllner T, Loerincik Y, Margni M, Nemecek T (2010). Implementation of life cycle impact assessment methods. Ecoinvent report No. 3. Dübendorf, Switzerland: Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories.

    Google Scholar 

  • Institut Bauen und Umwelt (2016). EPD, Product Category Rules Prefabricated building. Available at http://ibu-epd.com/en/epdprogram/product-category-rules-pcr. Accessed 27 July 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO (2006a). ISO 14040:2006, Environmental Management—Life Cycle Assessment—Principles and Framework. Geneva: International Standard Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO (2006b). ISO 14044:2006, Environmental Management—Life Cycle Assessment—Requirements and Guidelines. Geneva: International Standard Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jelle BP (2011). Traditional, state-of-the-art and future thermal building insulation materials and solutions—Properties, requirements and possibilities. Energy and Buildings, 43: 2549–2563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jelle BP, Hynd A, Gustavsen A, Arasteh D, Goudey H, Hart R (2012). Fenestration of today and tomorrow: A state-of-the-art review and future research opportunities. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, 96: 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Juntunen E, Tetri E, Tapaninen O, Yrjänä S, Kondratyev V, Sitomaniemi A, Siirtola H, Sarjanoja EM, Aikio J, Heikkinen V (2015). A smart LED luminaire for energy savings in pedestrian road lighting. Lighting Research and Technology, 47: 103–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamali M, Hewage K (2016). Life cycle performance of modular buildings: A critical review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 62: 1171–1183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim D (2008). Preliminary life cycle analysis of modular and conventional housing in Benton Harbor, Michigan. Master Thesis, University of Michigan, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolokotsa D, Rovas D, Kosmatopoulos E, Kalaitzakis K (2011). A roadmap towards intelligent net zero- and positive-energy buildings. Solar Energy, 85: 3067–3084.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li DHW, Yang L, Lam JC (2013a). Zero energy buildings and sustainable development implications—A review. Energy, 54: 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li DZ, Chen HX, Hui ECM, Zhang JB, Li QM (2013b). A methodology for estimating the life-cycle carbon efficiency of a residential building, Building and Environment 59: 448–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li H, Li GS, Wang LP, Liu ZX (2012). Green industrial buildings lighting design based on DIALux. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 214: 348–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mangkuto RA (2016). Validation of DIALux 4.12 and DIALux evo 4.1 against the Analytical Test Cases of CIE 171:2006. LEUKOS, 12: 139–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marszal AJ, Heiselberg P, Bourrelle JS, Musall E, Voss K, Sartori I, Napolitano A (2011). Zero Energy Building — A review of definitions and calculation methodologies, Energy and Buildings, 43: 971–979.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mateus R, Neiva S, Bragança L, Mendonça P, Macieira M (2013). Sustainability assessment of an innovative lightweight building technology for partition walls—Comparison with conventional technologies. Building and Environment, 67: 147–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maysenholder W (2008). Sound transmission loss of vacuum insulation panels. In: Proceedings of Acoustics 08 Paris, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merli Alcini C, Schiavoni S, Asdrubali F (2015). Simulation of daylighting conditions in a virtual underground city. Journal of Daylighting, 2: 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monahan J, Powell JC (2011). An embodied carbon and energy analysis of modern methods of construction in housing: A case study using a lifecycle assessment framework. Energy and Buildings, 43: 179–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moncaster AM, Symons KE (2013). A method and tool for “cradle to grave” embodied carbon and energy impacts of UK buildings in compliance with the new TC350standards. Energy and Buildings, 66: 514–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MVRDV (2016). Cancer Centre. Available at https://www.mvrdv.nl/projects/276-cancer-center-amsterdam. Accessed 27 Jul 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park J, Chae C, Kim SA (2014). Comparative study of housing life-cycle carbon emissions for the characteristics of structural materials. In: Proceedings of 2014 World Sustainable Building Conference, Barcelona, Spain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pisello AL, Castaldo VL, Pignatta G, Cotana F, Santamouris M (2015). Experimental in-lab and in-field analysis of waterproof membranes for cool roof application and urban heat island mitigation. Energy and Buildings, 114: 180–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plataforma arquitectura (2016). Casa Oruga, Available at http://www.plataformaarquitectura.cl/cl/02-271909/casa-oruga-sebasti an-irarrazaval-delpiano. Accessed 27 Jul 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramesh T, Prakash R, Shukl KK (2010). Life cycle energy analysis of buildings: An overview. Energy and Buildings, 42: 1592–1600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen B (2010). Sound insulation between dwellings—Requirements in building regulations in Europe. Applied Acoustics, 71: 373–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rockfon (2016). Product Datasheet. Available at http://www.rockfon.com. Accessed 27 Jul 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roes AL, Tabak LB, Shen L, Nieuwlaar E, Patel MK (2010). Influence of using nanobjects as filler on functionality-based energy use of nanocomposites. Journal of Nanoparticles Research, 12: 2011–2028.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossi B, Marique AF, Reiter S (2012). Life-cycle assessment of residential buildings in three different European locations, case study. Building and Environment, 51: 402–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salata F, Golasi I, Falanga G, Allegri M, de Lieto Vollaro E, Nardecchia F, Pagliaro F, Gugliermetti F, de Lieto Vollaro A (2015). Maintenance and energy optimization of lighting systems for the improvement of historic buildings: A case study. Sustainability, 7: 10770–10788.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sartori I, Napolitano A, Voss K (2012). Net zero energy buildings: A consistent definition framework. Energy and Buildings, 48: 220–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiavoni S, D’Alessandro F, Bianchi F, Asdrubali F (2016). Insulation materials for the building sector: A review and comparative analysis. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 62: 988–1011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen E, Hu J, Patel M (2014). Energy and visual comfort analysis of lighting and daylight control strategies. Building and Environment, 78: 155–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spillmann echsle architekten (2016). Freitag Flagship Store. Available at http://www.spillmannechsle.ch/wp/?p=140. Accessed 27 Jul 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spoladore A, Borelli D, Devia F, Mora F, Schenone C (2016). Model for forecasting residential heat demand based on natural gas consumption and energy performance indicators. Applied Energy, 182: 488–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sunny Design (2016). Sunny Design: Software description. Available at http://www.sunnydesignweb.com/sdweb/#/Home. Accessed 27 Jul 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yates D, Hughes L, Campbell A (2007). Sound insulation design of modular construction housing. In: Proceedings of 2007 Institute of Acoustics Spring Conference, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zissis G (2013). Light Sources and lighting: From technology to energy savings. In: Sabonnadière J-C (Ed), Low Emission Power Generation Technologies and Energy Management. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Engineering, University of Perugia, via G. Duranti 67, 06125, Perugia, Italy

    Samuele Schiavoni, Sara Sambuco & Antonella Rotili

  2. Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of Perugia, via G. Duranti 93, 06125, Perugia, Italy

    Francesco D’Alessandro

  3. Perugia, Italy

    Francesco Fantauzzi

Authors
  1. Samuele Schiavoni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sara Sambuco
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Antonella Rotili
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Francesco D’Alessandro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Francesco Fantauzzi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Samuele Schiavoni.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schiavoni, S., Sambuco, S., Rotili, A. et al. A nZEB housing structure derived from end of life containers: Energy, lighting and life cycle assessment. Build. Simul. 10, 165–181 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-016-0329-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-016-0329-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation