Skip to main content

A BIM-GIS integrated pre-retrofit model for building data mapping

Abstract

In response to rising energy costs and the impetus to reduce environmental impacts, upgrading the large building stock that is responsible for 40% of the total energy consumption to maximum energy efficiency is becoming an important task. Despite the many benefits associated with retrofit projects, they are still only slowly being implemented because of the many challenges that exist. One of these challenges is optimizing the decision between renovation scenarios based on economic and environmental goals, which can be made possible with an accurate pre-retrofit model. The intention of this paper is to introduce a pre-retrofit model that efficiently obtains and integrates multiple forms of building data as a critical step to develop a comprehensive understanding of a building to be renovated. Opportunities for utilizing building information modeling (BIM) and geographical information systems (GIS) for retrofitting projects were explored through the study of a historical campus building. With the use of as-is geometric data and as-is data, building data maps were obtained. The next step of this study is to use the model to conduct scenarios comparison and optimize renovation decision based on economic and environmental goals.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Achour K, Benkhelif (2001). A new approach to 3D reconstruction without camera calibration. Pattern Recognition, 34: 2467–2476.

    MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Addison AC, Gaiani M (2000). Virtualized architectural heritage: New tools and techniques tools for building virtual heritage. IEEE MultiMedia, 7(2): 26–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Amstalden RW, Kost M, Nathani C, Imboden DM (2007). Economic potential of energy-efficient retrofitting in the Swiss residential building sector: The effects of policy instruments and energy price expectations. Energy Policy, 35: 1819–1829.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Arias P, Ordóñez C, Lorenzo H, Herraez J (2006). Methods for documenting historical agro-industrial buildings: A comparative study and a simple photogrammetric method. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 7: 350–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Asadi E, Gameiro da Silva GM, Antunes CH, Dias L (2012). Multiobjective optimization for building retrofit strategies: A model and an application. Energy and Buildings, 44: 81–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ascione F, de Rossi F, Vanoli GP (2011). Energy retrofit of historical buildings: theoretical and experimental investigations for the modelling of reliable performance scenarios. Energy and Buildings, 43: 1925–1936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. ASHRAE (2010). ASHRAE ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 62.1-2010, Ventilation for Acceptable Indoor Air Quality. Atlanta: ASHRAE.

  8. Autodesk (2005). Autodesk Revit White Paper. Available at http://www.tpm.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/AGC_Guide_to_BIM.pdf. Accessed 24 Jul 2015.

  9. Balaras CA, Droutsa K, Argiriou AA, Asimakopoulos DN (2000). Potential for energy conservation in apartment buildings. Energy and Buildings, 31: 143–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ben H, Steemers K (2014). Energy retrofit and occupant behaviour in protected housing: A case study of the Brunswick Centre in London. Energy and Buildings, 80: 120–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Berardi U (2015). The development of a monolithic aerogel glazed window for an energy retrofitting project. Applied Energy, 154: 603–615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bernstein HM (2010). The Green Outlook 2011: Green Trends Driving Growth through 2015. New York: McGraw-Hill Construction.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bhatla A, Choe SY, Fierro O, Leite F (2012). Evaluation of accuracy of as-built 3D modeling from photos taken by handheld digital cameras. Automation in Construction, 28: 116–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Caputo P, Costa G, Ferrari S (2013). A supporting method for defining energy strategies in the building sector at urban scale. Energy Policy, 55: 261–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Cellura M, Di Gangi A, Longo S, Orioli A (2013). An Italian input–output model for the assessment of energy and environmental benefits arising from retrofit actions of buildings. Energy and Buildings, 62: 97–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Che L, Gao Z, Chen D, Nyugen T-H (2010). Using building information modeling for measuring the efficiency of building energy performance. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Computing in Civil and Building Engineering, Nottingham, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Dai F, Lu M (2010). Assessing the accuracy of applying photogrammetry to take geometric measurements on building products. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 136: 242–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. de Wilde P, Tian W, Augenbroe G (2011). Longitudinal prediction of the operational energy use of buildings. Building and Environment, 46: 1670–1680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. East WE, Nisbet N, Wix J (2010). Lightweight capture of as-built construction information. In: Dikbas A, Ergen E, Girtili H (eds), Managing IT in Construction. Istanbul: CRC Press, pp. 53–62.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Eastman C, Teicholz P, Sacks R, Liston K (2011). BIM Handbook: A Guide to Building Information Modeling for Owners, Managers, Designers, Engineers and Contractors, 2nd edn. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  21. EIA (2013). International Energy Outlook 2013. US Energy Information Administration. Available at http://www.eia.gov/forecasts/ieo/pdf/0484 (2013).pdf. Accessed 3 Jun 2014.

  22. EU (2012). European Parliament Report on the Energy Roadmap 2050. https://ec.europa.eu/energy/sites/ener/files/documents/2012_energy_roadmap_2050_en_0.pdf. Accessed 24 Feb 2016.

  23. Fracastoro GV, Serraino M (2011). A methodology for assessing the energy performance of large scale building stocks and possible applications. Energy and Buildings, 43: 844–852.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Fröhlich C, Mettenleiter M (2004). Terrestrial laser scanning-new perspectives in 3D surveying. In: Proceedings of ISPRS Workshop of Laser-Scanners for Forest and Landscape Assessment, Freiburg, Germany, pp. 7–13.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ganci G, Handley H (1998). Automation in videogrammetry. Available at http://www.geodetic.com/f.ashx/papers/Automationin-Videogrammetry.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Gao T, Akinci B, Ergan S, Garrett JH (2012). Constructing as-is BIMs from progressive scan data. Gerontechnology, 11: 75.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Göçer Ö, Hua Y, Göçer K (2015). Completing the missing link in building design process: Enhancing post-occupancy evaluation method for effective feedback for building performance. Building and Environment, 89: 14–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Goldstein K, Blasnik M, Heaney M, Polly B, Christensen C, Norford L (2014). Developing a pre-retrofit energy consumption metric to model post-retrofit energy savings: Phase one of a three-phase research initiative. Energy and Buildings, 80: 556–561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Gu N, London K (2010). Understanding and facilitating BIM adoption in the AEC industry. Automation in Construction, 19: 988–999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Güçyeter B, Günaydin HM (2012). Optimization of an envelope retrofit strategy for an existing office building. Energy and Buildings, 55: 647–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Henriques CO, Coelho DH, Antunes CH (2015). A multi-objective input-output model to assess E4 impacts of building retrofitting measures to improve energy efficiency. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 21: 483–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Heo Y, Choudhary R, Augenbroe GA (2012). Calibration of building energy models for retrofit analysis under uncertainty. Energy and Buildings, 47: 550–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Heo Y, Zavala VM (2012). Gaussian process modeling for measurement and verification of building energy savings. Energy and Buildings, 53: 7–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Hua Y, Göçer Ö, Göçer K (2014). Spatial mapping of occupant satisfaction and indoor environment quality in a LEED certified campus building. Building and Environment, 79: 124–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Jean-Angelo B (2004). Integration of laser scanning and close-range photogrammetry—The last decade and beyond. In: Proceedings of XXth International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing (ISPRS) Congress. Commission VII, Istanbul, Turkey, pp. 972–983.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Kern F (2001). Supplementing laser scanner geometric data with photogrammetric images for modeling. In: Proceedings of XVIIIth International CIPA Symposium on Surveying and Documentation of Historic Buildings, Monuments Sites: Traditional and Modern Methods, Potsdam, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Klein L, Li N, Becerik-Gerber B (2012). Imaged-based verification of as-built documentation of operational buildings. Automation in Construction, 21: 161–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Kumbaroglu G, Madlener R (2012). Evaluation of economically optimal retrofit investment options for energy savings in buildings. Energy and Buildings, 49: 327–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Kwok SSK, Yuen RKK, Lee EWM (2011). An intelligent approach to assessing the effect of building occupancy on building cooling load prediction. Building and Environment, 46: 1681–1690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Laefer DF, Truong-Hong L, Fitzgerald M (2011). Processing of terrestrial laser scanning point cloud data for computational modelling of building facades. Recent Patents on Computer Science, 4: 16–29.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Lerma JL, Navarro S, Cabrelles M, Villaverde V (2010). Terrestrial laser scanning and close range photogrammetry for 3D archaeological documentation: The Upper Palaeolithic Cave of Parpalló as a case study. Journal of Archaeological Science, 37: 499–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Ma Z, Cooper P, Daly D, Ledo L (2012). Existing building retrofits: Methodology and state-of-the-art. Energy and Buildings, 55: 889–902.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Mavromatidis G, Acha S, Shah N (2013). Diagnostic tools of energy performance for supermarkets using Artificial Neural Network algorithms. Energy and Buildings, 62: 304–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Miller E, Buys L (2008). Retrofitting commercial office buildings for sustainability: Tenants’ perspectives. Journal of Property Investment & Finance, 26: 552–561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. National Trust for Historic Preservation (2011). The greenest building: Qualifying the environmental value of building reuse. Preservation Green Lab, National Trust for Historic Preservatio, USA.

  46. Olgyay V, Seruto C (2010). Whole-building retrofits: A gateway to climate stabilization. ASHRAE Transactions, 116(2): 244–251.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Peng E, Li L (2010). Camera calibration using one-dimensional information and its applications in both controlled and uncontrolled environments. Pattern Recognition, 43: 1188–1198.

    MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Poel B, van Cruchten G, Balaras CA (2007). Energy performance assessment of existing dwellings. Energy and Buildings, 39: 393–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Polly B, Gestwick M, Bianchi M, Anderson R, Horowitz S, Christensen C, Judkoff R (2011). A Method for Determining Optimal Residential Energy Efficiency Retrofit Packages. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Available at http://www.osti.gov/bridge. Accessed 3 Dec 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Rodríguez J, Marín MT, Arias P, Ordóñez C, Herráez J (2008). Flat elements on buildings using close-range photogrammetry and laser distance measurement. Optics and Lasers in Engineering, 46: 541–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Rönnholm P, Honkavaara E, Litkey P, Hyyppä H, Hyyppä J (2007). Integration of laser scanning and photogrammetry. In: Proceedings of ISPRS Workshop on Laser Scanning 2007 and SilviLaser 2007, Espoo, Finland, pp. 355–362.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Rysanek AM, Choudhary R (2013). Optimum building energy retrofits under technical and economic uncertainty. Energy and Buildings, 57: 324–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Stazi F, Vegliò A, Di Perna C, Munafò P (2013). Experimental comparison between 3 different traditional wall constructions and dynamic simulations to identify optimal thermal insulation strategies. Energy and Buildings, 60: 429–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Styliadis AD (2007). Digital documentation of historical buildings with 3-d modeling functionality. Automation in Construction, 16: 498–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Swan LG, Ugursal VI, Beausoleil-Morrison I (2011). Occupant related household energy consumption in Canada: Estimation using a bottom-up neural-network technique. Energy and Buildings, 43: 326–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Tang P, Huber D, Akinci B, Lipman R, Lytle A (2010). Review Automatic reconstruction of as-built building information models from laser-scanned point clouds: A review of related techniques. Automation in Construction, 19: 829–843.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Tommerup H, Svendsen S (2006). Energy savings in Danish residential building stock. Energy and Buildings, 38: 618–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. United Nations (2007). Human Development Report of United Nations 2007/2008, United Nations Development Programme, USA, available at http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/reports/268/hdr_20072008_en_complete.pdf. Accessed 3 Jun 2014.

  59. Verbeeck G, Hens H (2005). Energy savings in retrofitted dwellings: Economically viable? Energy and Buildings, 37: 747–754.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Verbruggen A (2008). Retrofit of a century old land-house to a lowenergy house. International Journal of Environmental Technology and Management, 9: 402–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Wang B, Xia X (2015). Optimal maintenance planning for building energy efficiency retrofitting from optimization and control system perspectives. Energy and Buildings, 96: 299–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Woo J, Wilsmann J, Kang D (2010). Use of as-built building information modeling. In: Proceedings of Construction Research Congress 2010: Innovation for Reshaping Construction Practice, Banff, Canada, pp. 538–547.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  63. Yalcintas M (2008). Energy-savings predictions for building-equipment retrofits. Energy and Buildings, 40: 2111–2120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Yang X, Liu Y, Ergan S, Akinci B, Leicht R, Messner JI (2013). Lessons learned from developing immersive virtual mock-ups to support energy-efficient retrofit decision making. In: Proceedings of ASCE International Workshop on Computing in Civil Engineering, Los Angeles, California, pp. 210–217.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  65. Yu S-M, Tu Y, Luo C (2011). Green retrofitting costs and benefits: A new research agenda. Working Paper Series, Institute of Real Estate Studies, National University of Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Özgür Göçer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Göçer, Ö., Hua, Y. & Göçer, K. A BIM-GIS integrated pre-retrofit model for building data mapping. Build. Simul. 9, 513–527 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-016-0293-4

Download citation

Keywords

  • pre-retrofitting
  • as-is built modeling
  • post-occupancy evaluation
  • building information modeling (BIM)
  • geographical information systems (GIS)
  • data mapping