Building Simulation

, Volume 9, Issue 1, pp 75–87 | Cite as

Validation of numerical simulation tools for wind-driven natural ventilation design

Research Article Indoor/Outdoor Airflow and Air Quality

Abstract

This paper presents a validation of airflow network (AFN) and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations for a naturally ventilated office building using wind tunnel measurements as the reference for external pressure coefficients and effective airflow rate prediction. The CFD simulation model is also used to study the effect of partially open windows on the effective flow rate. This study also includes a design exercise for a naturally ventilated office building that analyses the differences in predicted average window open area for a typical weather year. The results obtained show that, for simple isolated buildings, CFD can predict pressure coefficients with less than 20% average error. For cases with interfering surrounding buildings or more complex building geometries the average error is less than 40%. Average errors in bulk flow rates are lower: typically less than 25%. The largest errors occur in effective flow rate predictions for cases where the openings are exposed to recirculations and shear driven flows.

Keywords

natural ventilation CFD simulation validation pressure coefficients airflow network 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson JD (1995). Computational Fluid Dynamics: The Basics with Applications. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  2. Asfour OS, Gadi MB (2007). A comparison between CFD and network models for predicting wind-driven ventilation in buildings. Building and Environment, 42: 4079–4085.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Awbi H (2003). Ventilation of Buildings. New York: Spon Press.Google Scholar
  4. Axley J (2007). Multizone airflow modeling in buildings: History and theory. HVAC&R Research, 13: 907–928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Belleri A, Lollini L, Dutton SM (2014). Natural ventilation design: An analysis of predicted and measured performance. Building and Environment, 81: 123–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bitsuamlak B (2006). Application of computational wind engineering: A practical perspective. In: Proceedings of 3rd National Conference in Wind Engineering, Kolkata, India.Google Scholar
  7. Blocken B (2014). 50 years of computational wind engineering: Past, present and future. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 129: 69–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Calautit JK, Hughes BR (2014). Wind tunnel and CFD study of the natural ventilation performance of a commercial multi-directional wind tower. Building and Environment, 80: 71–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. California Building Standards Commission (2013). California Building Standards Code, California Code of Regulations, Title 24.Google Scholar
  10. Carrilho da Graça G (2003). Simplified models for heat transfer in rooms. PhD Dissertation, University of California, San Diego, USA.Google Scholar
  11. Carrilho da Graça G, Linden PF, Haves P (2004). Design and testing of a control strategy for a large, naturally ventilated office building. Building Services Engineering Research and Technology, 25: 223–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Carrilho da Graça G, Martins NR, Horta CS (2012). Thermal and airflow simulation of a naturally ventilated shopping mall. Energy and Buildings, 50: 177–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Carrilho da Graça G, Daish NC, Linden PF (2015). A two-zone model for natural cross-ventilation. Building and Environment, 89: 72–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cermak JE (1971). Laboratory simulation of the atmospheric boundary layer. AIAA Journal, 9: 1746–1754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cermak JE (1975). Applications of fluid mechanics to wind engineering. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 97: 9–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cermak JE (1976). Aerodynamics of Buildings. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 8: 75–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. CHAM Ltd. (2012). PHOENICS 2011 (64bit Intel 17/06/2012). London.Google Scholar
  18. Chen Q (1995). Comparison of different k–e models for indoor air flow computations. Numerical Heat Transfer, Part B: Fundamentals, 28: 353–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Chen Q (2009). Ventilation performance prediction for buildings: A method overview and recent applications. Building and Environment, 44: 848–858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cheung JOP, Liu C-H (2011). CFD simulations of natural ventilation behaviour in high-rise buildings in regular and staggered arrangements at various spacings. Energy and Buildings, 43: 1149–1158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cochran L, Derickson R (2011). A physical modeler’s view of computational wind engineering. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 99: 139–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. CPP Wind (2015). CPP Wind Engineering & Air Quality Experts, CPP Wind Engineering & Air Quality Consulting for Building Design. Available at http://www.cppwind.com.Google Scholar
  23. Crawley DB, Lawrie LK, Winkelmann FC, Buhl WF, Joe Huang Y, Pedersen CO, Strand RK, Liesen RJ, Fisher DE, Witte MJ, Glazer J (2001). EnergyPlus: Creating a new-generation building energy simulation program. Energy and Buildings, 33: 319–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dutton SM, Banks D, Brunswick SL, Fisk WJ (2013). Health and economic implications of natural ventilation in California offices. Building and Environment, 67: 34–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Evola E, Popov V (2006). Computational analysis of wind driven natural ventilation in buildings. Energy and Buildings, 38: 491–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Franke J, Hellsten A, Schlünzen H, Carissimo B (2007). Best practice guideline for the CFD simulation of flows in the urban environment. Brussels: COST Office.Google Scholar
  27. Glória Gomes M, Moret Rodrigues A, Mendes P (2005). Experimental and numerical study of wind pressures on irregular-plan shapes. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 93: 741–756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Heiselberg P, Svidt K, Nielsen PV (2001). Characteristics of airflow from open windows. Building and Environment, 36: 859–869.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Heiselberg P, Bjørn E, Nielsen PV (2002). Impact of open windows on room air flow and thermal comfort. International Journal of Ventilation, 1: 91–100.Google Scholar
  30. Lo JL, Banks D, Novoselac A (2013). Combined wind tunnel and CFD analysis for indoor airflow prediction of wind-driven cross ventilation. Building and Environment, 60: 12–23.Google Scholar
  31. Jiang Y, Chen Q (2002). Effect of fluctuating wind direction on cross natural ventilation in buildings from large eddy simulation. Building and Environment, 37: 379–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Jiang Y, Alexander D, Jenkins H, Arthur R, Chen Q (2003). Natural ventilation in buildings: Measurement in a wind tunnel and numerical simulation with large-eddy simulation. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 91: 331–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Karava P, Stathopoulos T, Athienitis AK (2011). Airflow assessment in cross-ventilated buildings with operable facade elements. Building and Environment, 46: 266–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kato S, Murakami S, Mochida A, Akabayashi S-I, Tominaga Y (1992). Velocity-pressure field of cross ventilation with open windows analyzed by wind tunnel and numerical simulation. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 44: 2575–2586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kobayashi T, Sandberg M, Kotani H, Claesson L (2010). Experimental investigation and CFD analysis of cross-ventilated flow through single room detached house model. Building and Environment, 45: 2723–2734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Labat M, Woloszyn M, Garnier G, Roux JJ (2013). Assessment of the air change rate of airtight buildings under natural conditions using the tracer gas technique. Comparison with numerical modelling. Building and Environment, 60: 37–44.Google Scholar
  37. Linden PF (1999). The fluid mechanics of natural ventilation. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 31: 201–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Liu X, Niu J, Kwok KCS (2013). Evaluation of RANS turbulence models for simulating wind-induced mean pressures and dispersions around a complex-shaped high-rise building. Building Simulation, 6: 151–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Montazeri H, Blocken B (2013). CFD simulation of wind-induced pressure coefficients on buildings with and without balconies: Validation and sensitivity analysis. Building and Environment, 60: 137–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Nikas K-S, Nikolopoulos N, Nikolopoulos A (2010). Numerical study of a naturally cross-ventilated building. Energy and Buildings, 42: 422–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Nikolopoulos N, Nikolopoulos A, Larsen TS, Nikas K-SP (2012). Experimental and numerical investigation of the tracer gas methodology in the case of a naturally cross-ventilated building. Building and Environment, 56: 379–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Richards PJ, Norris SE (2011). Appropriate boundary conditions for computational wind engineering models revisited. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 99: 257–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Seifert J, Li Y, Axley J, Rösler M (2006). Calculation of wind-driven cross ventilation in buildings with large openings. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 94: 925–947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Seppänen O, Fisk WJ (2002). Association of ventilation system type with SBS symptoms in office workers. Indoor Air, 12: 98–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Shen X, Zhang G, Bjerg B (2012). Comparison of different methods for estimating ventilation rates through wind driven ventilated buildings. Energy and Buildings, 54: 297–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Teppner R, Langensteiner B, Meile W, Brenn G, Kerschbaumer S (2014). Air change rates driven by the flow around and through a building storey with fully open or tilted windows: An experimental and numerical study. Energy and Buildings, 76: 640–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Tominaga Y, Mochida A, Murakami S, Sawaki S (2008a). Comparison of various revised k–e models and LES applied to flow around a high-rise building model with 1:1:2 shape placed within the surface boundary layer. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 96: 389–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Tominaga Y, Mochida A, Yoshie R, Kataoka H, Nozu T, Yoshikawa M, Shirasawa T (2008b). AIJ guidelines for practical applications of CFD to pedestrian wind environment around buildings. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 96: 1749–1761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. United States Environmental Protection Agency (1981). Guideline for Fluid Modeling of Atmospheric Diffusion, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Report EPA-600/8-81-009.Google Scholar
  50. van Hooff T, Blocken B, Aanen L, Bronsema B (2011). A venturishaped roof for wind-induced natural ventilation of buildings: Wind tunnel and CFD evaluation of different design configurations. Building and Environment, 46: 1797–1807.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  51. van Hooff T, Blocken B (2013). CFD evaluation of natural ventilation of indoor environments by the concentration decay method: CO2 gas dispersion from a semi-enclosed stadium. Building and Environment, 61: 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wilcox S, Marion W (2008). User’s Manual for TMY3 Datasets, NREL/TP-581-43156. Colorado: National Renewable Energy Laboratory.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Zhang A, Gu M (2008). Wind tunnel tests and numerical simulations of wind pressures on buildings in staggered arrangement. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 96: 2067–2079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Zhou C, Wang Z, Chen Q, Jiang Y, Pei J (2014). Design optimization and field demonstration of natural ventilation for high-rise residential buildings. Energy and Buildings, 82: 457–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Tsinghua University Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nuno R. Martins
    • 1
  • Guilherme Carrilho da Graça
    • 1
  1. 1.Instituto Dom Luiz, Faculdade de CiênciasUniversidade de LisboaLisboaPortugal

Personalised recommendations