Building Simulation

, Volume 7, Issue 3, pp 263–275 | Cite as

CFD study of the effects of furniture layout on indoor air quality under typical office ventilation schemes

Research Article Indoor/Outdoor Airflow and Air Quality

Abstract

The relative freshness of indoor air in breathing zone can be measured by ventilation effectiveness. Numerous research articles in literature have investigated ventilation effectiveness under different ventilation schemes, different inlet/outlet positions, and different diffusor types. These researches seem to have a goal to find a solution to optimize ventilation effectiveness through manipulating ventilation system. In reality, however, the occupants of a rented office room have no right to manipulate the ventilation system; instead, they have to accept whatever rented to them. An important issue thus arises: how to improve ventilation effectiveness without changing ventilation system? This paper has built a CFD model about a typical office room, validated it by published experimental data in literature, and then applied it to twelve typical office situations/cases of different furniture layouts under different ventilation schemes. The simulation results of twelve cases show that furniture layout is an important factor in indoor airflow and temperature fields, and the quality of air in breathing zone can be significantly improved by adjusting furniture layout without making any change in ventilation system.

Keywords

furniture layout indoor air quality breathing zone ventilation effectiveness office CFD model 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Austin J, Brimblecombe P, Sturges W (2002). Air Pollution Science for the 21st Century. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
  2. Buratti C, Mariani R, Moretti E (2011). Mean age of air in a naturally ventilated office: Experimental data and simulations. Energy and Buildings, 43: 2021–2027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chen Q (1995). Comparison of different k-ɛ models for indoor airflow computations. Numerical Heat Transfer, 28: 353–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cheong KWD, Djunaedy E, Poh TK, Tham KW, Sekhar SC, Wong NH, Ullah MB (2003). Measurements and computations of contaminant’s distribution in an office environment. Building and Environment, 38: 135–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cheong KWD, Phua SY (2006). Development of ventilation design strategy for effective removal of pollutant in the isolation room of a hospital. Building and Environment, 41: 1161–1170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Coffey CJ, Hunt GR (2007). Ventilation effectiveness measures based on heat removal: Part 1. Definitions. Building and Environment, 42: 2241–2248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gee I (2001). Monitoring indoor air pollution. Indoor and Built Environment, 10: 123–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Halvonova B, Melikov A (2010). Performance of “ductless” personalized ventilation in conjunction with displacement ventilation: Impact of intake height. Building Environment, 45: 996–1005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kim KW, Kim S, Kim HJ, Park JC (2010). Formaldehyde and TVOC emission behaviors according to finishing treatment with surface materials using 20 L chamber and FLEC. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 177: 90–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lau J, Chen Q (2007). Floor-supply displacement ventilation for workshops. Building and Environment, 42: 1718–1730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lee KS, Zhang T, Jiang Z, Chen Q (2009). Comparison of airflow and contaminant distributions in rooms with traditional displacement ventilation and under-floor air distribution systems. ASHRAE Transactions, 115(2): 306–321.Google Scholar
  12. Li R, Sekhar S, Melikov A (2010). Thermal comfort and IAQ assessment of under-floor air distribution system integrated with personalized ventilation in hot and humid climate. Building Environment, 45: 1906–1913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Li X, Li D, Yang X, Yang J (2003). Total air age: An extension of the air age concept. Building and Environment, 38: 1263–1269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Li X, Zhao B (2004). Accessibility: A new concept to evaluate ventilation performance in a finite period of time. Indoor and Built Environment, 13:287–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lin Z, Chow TT, Fong KF, Tsang CF, Wang Q (2005). Comparison of performances of displacement and mixing ventilations. Part II: Indoor air quality. International Journal of Refrigeration, 28: 288–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lin Z, Jiang F, Chow TT, Tsang CF, Lu WZ (2006). CFD analysis of ventilation effectiveness in a public transport interchange. Building and Environment, 41: 254–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mortensen LH, Rode C, Peuhkuri R (2008). Investigation of airflow patterns in a microclimate by particle image velocimetry (PIV). Building and Environment, 43: 1929–1938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Pereira ML, Graudenz G, Tribess A, Morawska L (2009). Determination of particle concentration in the breathing zone for four different types of office ventilation systems. Building and Environment, 44: 904–911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rim D, Novoselac A (2010). Ventilation effectiveness as an indicator of occupant exposure to particles from indoor sources. Building and Environment, 45: 1214–1224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Tian L, Lin Z, Wang Q (2010). Comparison of gaseous contaminant diffusion under stratum ventilation and under displacement ventilation. Building and Environment, 45: 2035–2046.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Xamán J, Tun J, álvarez G, Chávez Y, Noh F (2009). Optimum ventilation based on the overall ventilation effectiveness for temperature distribution in ventilated cavities. International Journal of Thermal Sciences, 48: 1574–1585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Xing H, Hatton A, Awbi HB (2001). A study of the air quality in the breathing zone in a room with displacement ventilation. Building and Environment, 36: 809–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Yang W, Sohn J, Kim J, Son B, Park J (2009). Indoor air quality investigation according to age of the school buildings in Korea. Journal of Environmental Management, 90: 348–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Yin Y, Xu W, Gupta JK, Guity A, Marmion P, Manning A, Gulick B, Zhang X, Chen Q (2009). Experimental study on displacement and mixing ventilation systems for a patient ward. HVAC&R Research, 15: 1175–1191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Zhang T, Lee KS, Chen Q (2009). A simplified approach to describe complex diffusers in displacement ventilation for CFD simulations. Indoor Air, 19: 255–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Zhang Y, Li X, Wang X, Deng W, Qian K (2006). Spatial flow influence factor: A novel concept for indoor air pollutant control. Science in China Series E-Engineering & Materials Science, 49: 115–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Zoon WAC, Loomans MGLC, Hensen JLM (2011). Testing the effectiveness of operating room ventilation with regard to removal of airborne bacteria. Building and Environment, 46: 2570–2577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Tsinghua University Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Aerospace, Mechanical and Manufacturing EngineeringRMIT UniversityBundooraAustralia
  2. 2.Department of Building Science, School of ArchitectureTsinghua UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations