Skip to main content
Log in

Leveraging the analysis of parametric uncertainty for building energy model calibration

  • Research Article
  • Building Thermal, Lighting, and Acoustics Modeling
  • Published:
Building Simulation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Calibrated energy models are used for measurement and verification of building retrofit projects, predictions of savings from energy conservation measures, and commissioning building systems (both prior to occupancy and during real-time model based performance monitoring, controls and diagnostics). This paper presents a systematic and automated way to calibrate a building energy model. Efficient parameter sampling is used to analyze more than two thousand model parameters and identify which of these are critical (most important) for model tuning. The parameters that most affect the building’s energy end-use are selected and automatically refined to calibrate the model by applying an analytic meta-model based optimization. Real-time data from an office building, including weather and energy meter data in 2010, was used for the model calibration, while 2011 data was used for the model verification. The modeling process, calibration and verification results, as well as implementation issues encountered throughout the model calibration process from a user’s perspective are discussed. The total facility and plug electricity consumption predictions from the calibrated model match the actual measured monthly data within ±5%. The calibrated model gives 2.80% of Coefficient of Variation of Root Mean Squared Error (CV (RMSE)) and −2.31% of Normalized Mean Bias Error (NMBE) for the whole building monthly electricity use, which is acceptable based on the ASHRAE Guideline 14–2002. In this work we use EnergyPlus as a modeling tool, while the method can be used with other modeling tools equally as well.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aimdyn GoSUM Software (2010). Global Optimization, Sensitivity and Uncertainty in Models (GoSUM). Santa Barbara, USA: Aimdyn Inc. Available: http://aimdyn.com. Accessed Aug. 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • ASHRAE (2002). ASHRAE Guideline 14-2002: Measurement of Energy Demand and Savings. Atlanta, USA: American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers.

    Google Scholar 

  • ASHRAE (2010). ASHRAE Standard 90.1-2010 Energy Standard for Buildings Except Low-Rise Residential Buildings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Claridge DE (2004). Using simulation models for building commissioning. In: Proceedings of 4th International Conference for Enhanced Building Operations, Paris, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • DesignBuilder (2010). DesignBuilder 2.0. Avaialbe: http://www.designbuilder.co.uk.

    Google Scholar 

  • DOE (2012). 2011 Building Energy Data Book. Available: http://buildingsdatabook.eren.doe.gov/docs/DataBooks/2011_BEDB.pdf. Accessed Nov. 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dudley JH, Black D, Apte M, Piette MA, Berkeley P (2010). Comparison of demand response performance with an energyplus model in a low energy campus building. In: Proceedings of ACEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings, Pacific Grove, CA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhower B, O’Neill Z, Narayanan S, Fonoberov VA, Mezic I (2012). A methodology for meta-model based optimization in building energy models. Energy and Buildings, 47: 292–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhower B, O’Neill Z, Fonoberov VA, Mezic I (2011). Uncertainty and sensitivity decomposition of building energy models. Journal of Building Performance Simulation, 5: 171–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EnergyPlus (2011). EnergyPlus 6.0. Available: http://apps1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/energyplus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Firth S, Lomas K, Wright A (2010). Targeted household energy- efficiency measures using sensitivity analysis. Building Research and Information, 38: 25–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haves P, Salsbury T, Claridge D, Liu M (2001). Use of whole building simulation in on-line performance assessment: Modeling and implementation issues. In: Proceedings of 7th International IBPSA Conference, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keranen H, Suur-Uski T, Vuolle M (2007). Calibration of building simulation model by using building automation system-A case study. In: Proceedings of CLIMA 2007-WellBeing Indoors. Helsinki, Finland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li G, Wang S-W, Rabitz H, Wang S, Jaffe P (2002). Global uncertainty assessments by high dimensional model representations (HDMR). Chemical Engineering Science, 57: 4445–4460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu G, Liu M (2011). A rapid calibration procedure and case study for simplified simulation models of commonly used HVAC systems. Building and Environment, 46: 409–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu M, Claridge DE, Bensouda N, Heinemeier K, Uk Lee S, Wei G (2003). High performance commercial building systems: Manual of procedures for calibrating simulations of building systems. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. Available: http//buildings.lbl.gov/cec/pubs/E5P23T2b.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mara T, Tarantola S (2008). Application of global sensitivity analysis of model output to building thermal simulations. Building Simulation, 1: 290–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill Z, Shashanka M, Pang X, Bailey T, Haves P (2011a). Real Time model-based energy diagnostics in buildings. In: Proceedings of 12th International IBPSA Conference, Sydney, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill Z, Eisenhower B, Yuan S, Bailey T, Narayanan S, Fonoberov V (2011b). Modeling and calibration of energy models for a DoD building. ASHRAE Transactions, 117(2): 358–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pan Y, Huang Z, Wu G, Chen C (2006). The application of building energy simulation and calibration in two high-rise commercial buildings in Shanghai. In: Proceedings 2nd National Conference of IBPSA-USA: SimBuild, Cambridge, MA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollack M, Roderick Y, McEwan D, Wheatley C (2009). Building simulation as an assisting tool in designing an energy efficient building: A case study. In: Proceedings of 11th International IBPSA Conference (pp. 1191–11980), Glasgow, Scotland, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raftery P, Keane M, O’Donnell J (2011a). Calibrating whole building energy models: An evidence-based methodology. Energy and Buildings, 43: 2356–2364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raftery P, Keane M, O’Donnell J (2011b). Calibrating whole building energy models: Detailed case study using hourly measured data. Energy and Buildings, 43: 3666–3679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahni N, Ramdani N, Candau Y, Dalicieux P (1997). Application of group screening to dynamic building energy simulation models. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 57: 285–304.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ramirez R, Sebold F, Mayer T, Ciminelli M, Abrishami M (2005). A building simulation palooza: The California CEUS project and DrCEUS. In: Proceedings of 9th International IBPSA Conference, Montreal, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddy TA, Maor I, Sun J, Panjapornpon C (2006). ASHRAE Research Project 1051-RP Final Report: Procedures for Reconciling Computer-Calculated Results with Measured Energy Data.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddy TA (2006). Literature review on calibration of building energy simulation programs: Uses, problems, procedures, uncertainty and tools. ASHRAE Transactions, 112(1): 226–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saltelli A, Chan K, Scott EM (2000). Sensitivity Analysis. West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Sobol I, Kucherenko S (2009). Derivative based global sensitivity measures and their link with global sensitivity indices. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 79: 3009–3017.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Spitler, J, Fisher D, Zietlow D (1989). A primer on the use of influence coefficients in building simulation. In: Proceedings of International IBPSA Conference (pp. 299–304), Vancouver, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Struck C, Hensen J, Kotek P (2009). On the application of uncertainty and sensitivity analysis with abstract building performance simulation tools. Journal of Building Physics, 33: 5–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun J, Reddy TA, 2006. Calibration of building energy simulation programs using the analytical optimization approach (RP-1051). HVAC&R Research, 12: 177–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • USGBC (2010). US Green Building Council, LEED for New Construction & Major Renovations v3.0. Available: http://www.usgbc.org.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venancio R, Pedrini A (2009). The influence of design decisions on energy consumption and thermal performance: The case of UFRN Campus, Brazil. In: Proceedings of 11th International IBPSA Conference (pp. 136–143), Glasgow, Scotland, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wetter M, Wright J (2003). Comparison of a generalized pattern search and a genetic algorithm optimization method. In: Proceedings of 8th International IBPSA Conference (pp. 1401–1408), Eindhoven, Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox S, Marion W (2008). Users Manual for TMY3 Data Sets. NREL Technical Report: NREL/TP-581-43156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoon J, Lee EJ, Claridge DE (2003). Calibration procedure for energy performance simulation of a commercial building. Journal of Solar Energy Engineering, 125: 251–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zheng O’Neill.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

O’Neill, Z., Eisenhower, B. Leveraging the analysis of parametric uncertainty for building energy model calibration. Build. Simul. 6, 365–377 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-013-0125-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-013-0125-8

Keywords

Navigation