Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of coarse grid lattice Boltzmann and Navier Stokes for real time flow simulations in rooms

  • Research Article
  • Indoor/Outdoor Airflow and Air Quality
  • Published:
Building Simulation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Coarse grid lattice Boltzmann models (LBM) and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) are compared in building simulations. Three simulations are used to assess the different numerical models: (i) a 2D isothermal flow case, (ii) a 3D isothermal flow case and (iii) a 2D non-isothermal flow case. Both models predicted the correct flow patterns and temperature field and could be used for real time (RT), near real time (NRT) and faster than real time (FRT) simulations without loss of accuracy on multi-core processors. The results indicate that the coarse grid CFD is both faster and more time accurate than the LBM for unsteady simulations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ANSYS (2010). ANSYS Fluent User’s Guide.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beitelmal AH, Patel DC (2007). Thermo-fluids provisioning of a high perfrormance density data center. Distributed and Parallel Databases, 21: 227–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blay D, Mergui S, Niculae C (1992). Confined turbulent mixed convection in the presence of horizontal buoyant wall jet. Fundamentals of Mixed Convection, 213: 65–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen Q (2009). Ventilation performance for buildings: A method overview and recent applications. Building and Environment, 44: 848–858.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crouse B, Krafczyk M, Kuhner S, Rank E, Treeck CV (2002). Indoor air flow analysis based on lattice Boltzmann methods. Energy and Buildings, 34: 941–949.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch C (2007). Numerical Computation of Internal and External Flows: The Fundamentals of Computational Fluid Dynamics, 2nd edn. Burlington, USA: Butterworth-Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Imamura T, Suzuki K, Nakamura T, Yoshida M (2005). Acceleration of steady-state lattice Boltzmann simulations on non-uniform mesh using local time step method. Journal of Computational Physics, 202: 645–663.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhner S, Crouse B, Rank E (2004). From a product model to visualization: Simulation of indoor flows with lattice-Boltzmann methods. Computer Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 19: 411–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuznik F, Rusaouen G (2007). Numerical prediction of natural convection occuring in building components: A double-population lattice Boltzmann method. Numerical Heat Transfer, Part A, 52: 315–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li W, Wei X, Kaufman A (2003). Implementing lattice Boltzmann computation on graphics hardware. The visual Computer, 19: 444–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Megri AC, Haghighat F (2007). Zonal modeling for simulating indoor environment of buildings: Review, recent developments, and applications. HVAC&R Research, 13: 887–905.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen PV (1990). Specification of a two-dimensional test case. International Energy Agency, Energy Conservation in Buildings and Community Systems, Annex 20: Air Flow Pattern Within Buildings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen PV (2004). Computational fluid dynamics and room air movement. Indoor Air, 14(Suppl 7): 134–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OpenFoam (2012). OpenFoam User’s Guide, Release 2.1.1.

    Google Scholar 

  • PowerFlow (2009). PowerFlow User’s Guide, Release 4.2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qiu F, Zhao Y, Fan Z, Wei X, Lorenz H, Wang J, Yoakum-Stover S, Kaufman A, Mueller K (2004). Dispersion simulation and visualization for urban security. In: Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Visualization, Texas, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlichting H (1979). Boundary Layer Theory, 7th edn. New York: McGrawHill.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Stam J (1999). Stable fluids. In: Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 99, Los Angeles, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sukop MC, Thorne DT (2006). Lattice Boltzmann Modeling: An Introduction for Geoscientists and Engineers. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Susin RM, Lindner GA, Mariani VC, Mendonca KC (2009). Evaluating the influence of the width of inlet slot on the prediction of indoor airflow: Comparison with experimental data. Building and Environment, 44: 971–986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • VanGilder JW, Zhang X (2008). Coarse-grid CFD: The effect of grid size on data center modeling. ASHRAE Transactions, 114(2): 166–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei X, Zhao Y, Fan Z, Li W, Qiu W, Yoakum-Stover S, Kaufman AE (2004). Lattice-based flow field modeling. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 10: 719–729

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei X, Zhao Y, Fan Z, Li W, Yoakum-Stover S, Kaufman A (2003). Blowing in the wind. In: Proceedings of Eurographics/SIGGRAPH Symposium on Computer Animation, Aire-la-Ville, Switzerland, pp. 75–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenisch P, Van Treeck C, Rank E (2004). Interactive indoor air flow analysis using high performance computing and virtual reality techniques. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Air Distribution in Rooms (RoomVent2004), Coimbra, Portugal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu E, Zhu H, Liu X, Liu Y (2007). Simulation and interaction of fluid dynamics. Visual Computer, 23: 299–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Z, Zhang W, Zhai Z, Chen Q (2007). Evaluation of various turbulence models in predicting airflow and turbulence in enclosed environments by CFD: Part-2: Comparison with experimental data from literature. HVAC&R Research, 13: 871–886.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuo W, Chen Q (2009). Real-time or faster-than-real-time simulation of airflow in buildings. Indoor Air, 19: 33–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuo W, Chen Q (2010). Fast and informative flow simulations in a building using fast fluid dynamics model on graphics processing unit. Building and Environment, 45: 747–757.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Basman Elhadidi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Elhadidi, B., Khalifa, H.E. Comparison of coarse grid lattice Boltzmann and Navier Stokes for real time flow simulations in rooms. Build. Simul. 6, 183–194 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-013-0107-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-013-0107-x

Keywords

Navigation