Building Simulation

, Volume 5, Issue 4, pp 315–324 | Cite as

Integration model of hygrothermal analysis with decay process for durability assessment of building envelopes

Research Article Building Thermal, Lighting, and Acoustics Modeling


In this study a numerical simulation model that integrates hygrothermal analysis with the decaying process of wood structures caused by moisture accumulation is presented. This simulation model can quantitatively predict both hygrothermal conditions within the building envelopes and the progress of decay in wood structures under variable conditions. The following are characteristics of the simulation model used in this study: (1) the development of wood decay represented by a differential equation with a variable of mass loss of wood substance and (2) the addition into moisture balance equations of biochemical reactions within wood decay. Hence, the simulation model enables assessment of the long-term performance of building envelopes with regard to both durability and drying potential. Rate constants of the wood decay and a coefficient of the moisture production for the model were determined by the mass loss data of small wood samples in decay tests using Fomitopsis palustris, a brown rot fungus. Additionally, numerical simulations using the model were implemented to understand both the decaying process and moisture accumulation within building envelopes. The results numerically demonstrated important phenomenon that the moisture production by biochemical reactions of wood decay helps to maintain the decaying process.


building envelope hygrothermal analysis durability assessment wood decay biochemical reaction 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. EN 133 (1991). Determination of toxic value of wood preservatives against wood destroying basidiomycetes cultured on agar medium. European Committee for Standardization, Brussel.Google Scholar
  2. Fukuda K, Okayasu Y, Haraguchi T (1981). Influence of temperature on the growth and wood-decomposing ability of wood-rotting fungi. Bulletin Experiment Forests Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, 17: 49–55.Google Scholar
  3. Gooding GV, Hodges CS, Ross EW (1966). Effect of temperature on growth and survival of Fomesannosus. Forest Science, 12: 325–333.Google Scholar
  4. Hens H (1996). Heat, air, and moisture transfer in insulated envelope parts. Task 1; modeling. Final Report, International Energy Agency, Energy Conservation in Buildings and Community System. Annex24: — Heat, Air, and Moisture Transfer in New and Retrofitted Building Envelope Parts.Google Scholar
  5. JIS K 1571 (2004). Test methods for determining the effectiveness of wood preservatives and their performance requirements. Japanese Standard Association, Japan.Google Scholar
  6. Krus M, Sedlbauer K (2005). Mould growth prediction by computational simulation. Annex41 Report “A1-T4-D-5-1.pdf” in Trondheim Meeting, Trondheim, Norway.Google Scholar
  7. Kumaran K, Lackey J, Normandin N, van Reenen D, Tariku F (2002). Hygrothermal properties of several building materials. Summary Report from Task 3 of MEWS Project (NRCC-45369).Google Scholar
  8. Nofal M, Kumaran MK (1999). Durability assessments of wood-frame construction using the concept of damage-functions. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference Durability of Building Materials and Components (pp. 766–799), Vancouver, Canada.Google Scholar
  9. Nofal M, Kumaran MK (2011). Biological damage function models for durability assessments of wood and wood-based products in building envelopes. European Journal of Wood and Wood Products, 69: 619–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Suzuki K (1994). Effect of cyclic change of temperature on fungal growth and mass loss. The International Research Group on Wood Preservation, Document No.IRG/WP 94-10065, Bali, Indonesia.Google Scholar
  11. Viitanen HA (1997). Modelling the time factor in the development of brown rot decay in pine and spruce sapwood — The effect of critical humidity and temperature conditions. Holzforschung, 51: 96–106.Google Scholar
  12. Viitanen H, Toratti T, Makkonen L, Peuhkuri R, Ojanen T, Ruokolainen L, Räisänen J (2010). Towards modeling of decay risk of wooden materials. European Journal of Wood and Wood Products, 68: 303–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Zabel RA, Morrell JJ (1992). Wood Microbiology — Decay and Its Prevention. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  14. Zelinka S, Derome, D, Glass S (2011). Combining hygrothermal and corrosion models to predict corrosion of metal fasteners embedded in wood. Building and Environment, 46: 2060–2068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Tsinghua University Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ashikaga Institute of TechnologyDivision of Architecture and Civil EngineeringAshikaga-City Tochigi-Pre.Japan
  2. 2.Faculty of AgricultureTokyo University of Agriculture and TechnologyTokyoJapan
  3. 3.Department of Environmental EngineeringBuilding Research InstituteIbarakiJapan

Personalised recommendations