BIOspektrum

, Volume 24, Issue 1, pp 23–26 | Cite as

Lactobacillus – Alleskönner für die Gesundheit?

Wissenschaft Lactobacillus – Mikrobe des Jahres 2018
  • 11 Downloads

Abstract

Be it intestinal health, skin care, reduction of allergies, or proven probiotics for health: almost everywhere we come across the lactic acid bacterium Lactobacillus. It seems this microorganism is an all-rounder. What is its impact on health and what scientific evidences can be found? An attempt to take stock.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. [1]
    Dominguez-Bello MG, De Jesus-Laboy KM, Shen N et al. (2016) Partial restoration of the microbiota of cesarean-born infants via vaginal microbial transfer. Nat Med 22:250–253CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Neu J, Rushing J (2011) Cesarean versus vaginal delivery: long term infant outcomes and the hygiene hypothesis. Clin Perinatol 38:321–331CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Kim SH, Jeung W, Choi I et al. (2016) Lactic acid bacteria improves Peyer’s patch cell-mediated immunoglobulin A and tight-junction expression in a destructed gut microbial environment. J Microbiol Biotechnol 26:1035–1045CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Zacharof MP, Lovitt RW (2012) Bacteriocins produced by lactic acid bacteria. A review article. APCBEE Procedia 2:50–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations and World Health Organization (2002). Guidelines for the Evaluation of Probiotics in Food. www.who.int/foodsafety /fs_ management/en/probiotic_guidelines.pdfGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Liévin-Le Moal V, Servin A (2014) Anti-infective activities of Lactobacillus strains in the human intestinal microbiota: from probiotics to gastrointestinal anti-infectious biotherapeutic agents. Clin Microbiol Rev 27:167–199CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Sanders ME, Benson A, Lebeer S et al. (2017) Shared mechanisms among probiotic taxa: implications for general probiotic claims. Curr Opin Biotechnol 49:207–216CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Ford AC, Quigley EM, Lacy BE et al. (2014) Efficacy of prebiotics, probiotics, and synbiotics in irritable bowel syndrome and chronic idiopathic constipation: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol 109:1547–1561CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Cryan JF, Dinan TD (2012) Mind-altering microorganisms: the impact of the gut microbiota on brain and behaviour. Nat Rev Neurosci 13:701–712CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Benton D, Williams C, Brown A (2007) Impact of consuming a milk drink containing a probiotic on mood and cognition. Eur J Clin Nutr 61:355–361CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Lang C, Böttner M, Holz C et al. (2010) Specific Lactobacillus/mutans Streptococcus co-aggregation. J Dent Res 89:175–179CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Holz C, Busjahn A, Mehling H et al. (2015) Significant reduction in Helicobacter pylori load in humans with nonviable Lactobacillus reuteri DSM17648: a pilot study. Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins 7:91–100CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Mehling H, Busjahn A (2013) Non-viable Lactobacillus reuteri DSMZ 17648 (Pylopass™) as a new approach to H. pylori control. Nutrients 5:3062–3072CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Bordin DS, Voynovan IN, Khomeriki SG et al. (2016) Efficacy and safety of Lactobacillus reuteri DSMZ17648 in patients infected with Helicobacter pylori. Lechaschi Vrach 5.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ORGANOBALANCE GmbH, Novozymes A/S, BerlinBerlinDeutschland

Personalised recommendations