Cardiac Progenitor Cell–Derived Extracellular Vesicles Reduce Infarct Size and Associate with Increased Cardiovascular Cell Proliferation

Abstract

Cell transplantation studies have shown that injection of progenitor cells can improve cardiac function after myocardial infarction (MI). Transplantation of human cardiac progenitor cells (hCPCs) results in an increased ejection fraction, but survival and integration are low. Therefore, paracrine factors including extracellular vesicles (EVs) are likely to contribute to the beneficial effects. We investigated the contribution of EVs by transplanting hCPCs with reduced EV secretion. Interestingly, these hCPCs were unable to reduce infarct size post-MI. Moreover, injection of hCPC-EVs did significantly reduce infarct size. Analysis of EV uptake showed cardiomyocytes and endothelial cells primarily positive and a higher Ki67 expression in these cell types. Yes-associated protein (YAP), a proliferation marker associated with Ki67, was also increased in the entire infarcted area. In summary, our data suggest that EV secretion is the driving force behind the short-term beneficial effect of hCPC transplantation on cardiac recovery after MI.

Introduction

Cardiovascular disease is one of the most prevalent causes of mortality in the world, and myocardial infarction (MI) attributes to almost one third of its deaths [1]. Though many of the risk factors leading to MI can be treated to prevent recurrence, the tissue damage remains untreatable to date. The loss of cardiomyocytes is permanent, reducing cardiac output and ultimately leading to end-stage heart failure. To prevent heart failure, therapies aiming to reduce damage to the injured myocardial wall and/or replace the lost cardiomyocytes have been explored. One approach to repair cardiac tissue was to inject human heart–derived cardiac progenitor cells (hCPCs) into the border zone of the infarction. Since hCPCs are able to differentiate into cardiomyocytes, endothelial cells, and smooth muscle cells in vitro [2, 3], they are likely candidates to replenish the infarcted heart with new cardiovascular cells. Transplantation of hCPCs into the infarct border zone has indeed been shown to lead to a sustained stabilization in cardiac function up to 3 months post-MI and was accompanied by a significant increase in the number of murine vessels in the infarct border zone [4]. However, only a small percentage of the injected hCPCs remained in the mouse heart 3 months after transplantation [4]. Two weeks after transplantation, an increase in vessel density was already discerned, with no evidence of vascular differentiation yet of the injected progenitor cells [5]. Most interestingly, an effect on cardiac function was observed as early as 2 days post-MI [4]. These observations suggest that hCPCs positively influence the post-MI environment through the secretion of paracrine factors, instead of direct differentiation into cardiovascular cells that rebuild the myocardial wall. This is further supported by our observation that extracellular vesicles (EVs) isolated from hCPCs have a great pro-angiogenic potential in vitro and in vivo [6, 7], due to the presence of several pro-angiogenic factors in and on these EVs, of which extracellular matrix metalloproteinase inducer (EMMPRIN) is a major determinant [6, 7].

EVs form a population comprising a multitude of microvesicles, of which the smallest is termed exosomes, ranging from 50 to 150 nm in size. Exosomes have a lipid bilayer membrane and their content includes mRNAs, miRNAs, and proteins [8,9,10]. EVs are able to influence many aspects of cell behavior, such as migration and proliferation, modulate the immune response, and can signal over both short and long distances [6, 11,12,13]. These influential characteristics make EVs promising as therapy after MI, since after injection, they potentially can affect the cardiovascular cells in the damaged and ischemic area.

Another effect of hCPC transplantation is an increase in the number of PCNA-expressing cells in the mouse myocardium [5]. Inducing proliferation of the surviving endogenous cardiomyocytes can also lead to restoration of cardiac contractility. Unfortunately, although proliferation of cardiomyocytes is observed in neonates, this capacity reduces dramatically shortly after birth [14]. Until recently, the adult mammalian heart was considered a post-mitotic organ [15], but Bergmann et al. showed that cardiomyocyte turnover was present in the adult heart, albeit at only 0.3–1% per year [16, 17]. The transcription factor Meis1 has been shown to be involved in the decrease in cardiomyocyte proliferation after birth [18], while other studies have shown the involvement of the Hippo pathway in cardiomyocyte proliferation [19, 20]. Inhibition of Hippo pathway components leads to activation of YAP, which induces proliferation of cardiomyocytes [21, 22].

Since hCPC transplantation after MI improves cardiac function within 48 h after injection [4], which is too early to be the result of hCPC differentiation [5], hCPC transplantation does increase the number of PCNA-expressing cells in the mouse myocardium [5], and hCPCs secrete EVs that are pro-angiogenic [6, 7], the aim of this study is to determine if hCPC-secreted EVs are responsible for the early beneficial effects after hCPC transplantation.

Materials and Methods

Cell Culture

Primary hCPC isolation of human heart tissue was performed as previously described [23, 24]. Human heart tissue was obtained based on individual informed consent, after approval by the Medical Ethics committee of the Leiden University Medical Center. The investigation conforms with the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki. For the isolation of EVs, hCPCs (fetal CPCs, HFH17.1) were cultured for 4 days in medium containing EV-depleted serum as described before [7]. Human microvascular endothelial cells (HMEC-1, ATCC), used for functional assessment of the hCPC-EV activity [6], were isolated as previously described [25, 26] and cultured on fibronectin-coated flasks in MCDB131 medium (without L-glutamine) with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 10 ng/mL epidermal growth factor (EGF), 1 μg/mL hydrocortisone, 10 mM glutamine, and 1% penicillin/streptomycin. All cells were cultured at 37 °C with 5% CO2.

EV Isolation and Labelling

After culturing hCPCs for 4 days, conditioned medium was harvested, and hCPC-EVs were isolated by differential centrifugation with a final step at 110,000×g, as described previously [7]. Density separation was performed by sucrose gradient. EVs were mixed into the bottom layer containing 2.5 M sucrose, followed by a layered gradient ranging from 2 to 0.4 M sucrose. The gradient was centrifuged for 16 h at 190,000×g, divided in 12 fractions, washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), centrifuged 70 min at 110,000×g, and used for Western blot analysis. To label EVs, PKH26 or PKH67 (Sigma) was incubated with isolated EVs according to the manufacturer’s protocol. After a 10-min incubation, labelling was stopped by adding FBS (ultra-EV free, centrifuged overnight at 160,000×g), and EVs were isolated by a sucrose gradient as described above. The fraction containing EVs was washed with PBS and centrifuged for 70 min at 110,000×g. Pellet was resuspended in PBS and diluted to a concentration of 0.8 μg/μL based on EV protein, assessed by BCA assay (Thermo Fischer).

Characterization of EVs

EV characterization was performed by loading 10 μL of EV-isolate, corrected for equal cell numbers, onto a 10% SDS-PAGE gel and Western blot analysis for flotillin-1 (rabbit, SC-25506, Santa Cruz), CD9 (sc-53,679, Santa Cruz), CD63 (CBL-553, Millipore), CD81, ALIX, TSG101, and EMMPRIN (10R-CD147alphaHu, Fitzgerald) [27]. Purity of EV isolates was confirmed by absence of calnexin (mouse, SC-80645, Santa Cruz) and underrepresentation of AGO. EV size was analyzed with qNano (Izon) to confirm size distribution and concentration, and TEM was used to visualize the vesicles. EV functionality was confirmed using a scratch assay [7]. A scratch was made in a monolayer of HMEC-1 cells and any floating cells were removed. Medium was replaced by basal MCDB131 with or without the addition of 5 μg/mL EVs (determined by BCA assay, Thermo Fischer), or equal volumes of EV-isolate (corrected for equal cell numbers). Percentage closure was determined after 24 h.

Rab27A and Rab27B Knockdown

Knockdown of Rab27A and Rab27B was established via lentiviral-mediated shRNA (TRCN0000380306, TRCN0000294016, MISSION library, Sigma). As a control, cells were transduced with a shRNA targeting luciferase (SHC007, MISSION library). Medium was changed after 16 h and the cells were subjected to puromycin selection for 48 h. Knockdown was verified by qPCR. RNA was isolated using TriPure (Sigma), according to manufacturer’s specifications. cDNA was synthesized with the RevertAid First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Thermo Scientific) using 1 μg of RNA. Expression levels of Rab27A and Rab27B were assessed by quantitative real-time PCR using SYBR-green mastermix (Bio-Rad Laboratories). Housekeeping genes GAPDH, β-actin, and ARP were used to normalize expression levels. For further EV analysis (Western Blot, qNano, scratch analysis), volumes of EV isolates were corrected for number of cells.

Myocardial Infarction by Ligation of the Left Anterior Descending Artery

All animal experiments were approved by the Animal Ethical Experimentation Committee of the Leiden University Medical Center and carried out in accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Male NOD-SCID mice, 10–12 weeks old, were anesthetized by intraperitoneal injection (i.p.) of 200 μL anesthesia mixture (0.05 mg/mL dexmedetomidine, 0.01 mg/mL fentanyl, and 1 mg/mL midazolam) and subsequently intubated. The left anterior descending artery (LAD) was permanently ligated as described previously [28]. After 15 min, PBS, 0.5*106 hCPCs, or 8 μg of purified EVs were injected into the border zone of the infarction, with two injections of 5 μL on each side of the ligation. Injections were randomly assigned. The mice were awakened by i.p. injection of an antagonist mixture (100 μL, 0.08 mg/mL flumazenil, 0.4 mg/mL atipamezole, 0.025 mg/mL buprenorfine). PBS-injected mice were used as control group for all experimental conditions to reduce animal numbers. Mice were excluded from further analysis in case of irregularities during surgery that could affect infarct size including lack of blanching of the cardiac tissue after ligation or when the location of the suture was incorrect. Number of animals per experiment is shown in figure legends.

TTC Staining

After 2 days, the animals received a lethal dose of anesthesia, after which the hearts were flushed with Evans-blue to identify the transfused area. Subsequently, the hearts were collected, sliced into 1 mm slices, and stained with 1% TTC in Sorensen buffer. Slices were imaged with AxioCamICc3 and infarct size was analyzed with ImageJ (v1.50f). Infarct size was analyzed by measuring total left ventricular area and infarcted area and calculating the infarct as a percentage of total left ventricular area. Analyses were performed blinded.

Immunostaining

Hearts destined for immunohistochemical analysis were incubated overnight in 15% sucrose solution, embedded in optimal cutting temperature (OCT) compound, and stored at − 80 °C. Cryosections of 7 μm were cut transversally from apex to the site of ligation, with 280 μm intervals after every 33 sections. Sections were dried and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde before staining. The following antibodies were used for staining the sections: α-Ki67 (rabbit, AB9260, Millipore), α-MF20 (mouse, DSHB), α-αSMA (mouse, A2547, Sigma), α-cTNI (goat, 4 T21/2, HyTest), α-CD31 (goat, SC-1506, Santa Cruz), α-YAP (rabbit, 4912, Cell Signaling), and α-Endoglin (goat, AF1097, R&D systems). The α-YAP antibody was amplified using TSA amplification (Thermo Fisher). After incubation with the appropriate secondary antibody, the sections were counterstained with DAPI and mounted with Fluoromount (Sigma). The sections were imaged using a Leica microscope and scanned with Pannoramic Slide Scanner (3D Histech). Analysis was performed with ImageJ software.

Quantification of Proliferative Markers

To determine where in the heart EVs induce proliferation markers, the total number of Ki67 and YAP-expressing cells was determined in sections at levels 3 until 8 of a pilot group (see Fig. 3a). The total number of positive nuclei was counted in the infarct area plus border zone, corrected for infarct size. Since levels 5 and 6 showed the highest uptake of EVs and numbers of positive cells, quantification of proliferating cell types in sections of levels 5 and 6 was performed in all the hearts. An area of 1.2 mm2 in the border zone was analyzed, spanning the entire width of the ventricle. Cells with Ki67-positive nuclei were categorized based on co-staining with cell type–specific markers and morphology into cardiomyocytes, endothelial cells, and other/interstitial cells. Endoglin was analyzed as total area of endoglin signal in the sections corrected for total cardiac area. All analyses were performed blinded for treatment.

Statistical Analysis

All data are presented as mean ± SEM. The statistical difference between two groups was analyzed using an unpaired Student’s t test, with Welch’s correction in case of unequal variances. For three or more groups, one-way ANOVA was used, with Bonferroni as post hoc test. Level of significance was set at p < 0.05.

Results

Infarct Size Is Not Affected After Injection of hCPCs with Reduced Vesicle Secretion

Transplantation of hCPC resulted in beneficial effects on the heart after MI [4]. Interestingly, EVs secreted by hCPCs were shown to possess pro-angiogenic activity [7]; hence, paracrine factors may represent an important component of the beneficial effects of cardiac progenitor cell transplantation on the heart after MI. Therefore, our first aim was to examine to what extend the secretion of EVs by hCPCs contributes to this effect. Rab27A and Rab27B are part of the EV secretion pathway, and loss of these proteins has been documented to affect EV secretion [29]. To this end, we transduced hCPCs with lentiviruses expressing shRNA for Rab27A and Rab27B or a scrambled control (sControl). qPCR analysis revealed efficient knockdown of Rab27A and Rab27B (Fig. 1a). To determine if the knockdown influenced the EV secretion of hCPCs, conditioned medium of sControl-hCPCs, Rab27A KD-hCPCs, and Rab27B KD-hCPCs was processed for EV isolation by ultracentrifugation. EV-isolates were resuspended in equal volumes and corrected for the number of cells the conditioned medium was derived from. We confirmed the presence of extracellular vesicles in the conditioned medium of sControl-hCPCs with Western blot for EV markers and by determining the density of vesicles (Supplemental Fig. 1A, B). qNano technology revealed a population of vesicles within a size range of 50–150 nm, with a mean diameter ± 100 nm (Supplemental Fig. 1C), suggesting the presence of exosome-like vesicles, which could be confirmed by EM (Supplemental Fig. 1D) [10, 27]. In the EV-isolates of Rab27A KD-hCPCs, the number of secreted vesicles was decreased, while Rab27B knockdown did not affect vesicle secretion (Fig. 1b). Although Rab27A knockdown increased the mRNA levels of Rab27B, this did not restore the number of secreted EVs to sControl-hCPC levels (Fig. 1a, b). Western blot analysis for exosomal-enriched protein Flot-1 confirmed a drastic reduction of the amount of EVs in the EV isolates upon Rab27A knockdown, while no difference was seen in the EV isolates from Rab27B KD-hCPCs compared to sControl-hCPCs (Fig. 1c). We have previously reported that migration of endothelial cells was increased after stimulation with EVs from hCPCs [7]. Therefore, we examined whether migration of HMEC-1 cells was attenuated when subjected to EV-isolates from the Rab27A KD-hCPCs, compared the sControl-hCPCs. Indeed, isolations from Rab27A KD-hCPCs were unable to stimulate the migration of HMEC-1 cells in a scratch assay to the same extend as sControl-hCPC (Fig. 1d).

Fig. 1
figure1

Rab knockdown reduces the secretion of EVs as well as their positive effect in vitro and in vivo. a Rab knockdown analysis by qPCR. Both Rab27A and Rab27B are effectively knocked down after lentiviral shRNA transduction. b qNano analysis of vesicles in the EV isolate by sControl-hCPCs, and hCPCs with Rab27A and Rab27B knockdown. Only Rab27A KD reduces the number of EVs compared to sControl-hCPCs. c Western blot for flotillin-1 confirms reduction of EVs by Rab27A knockdown, while no effect is seen with Rab27B knockdown. d Effect of EV isolate on migration of endothelial cells after scratch assay. EV isolate from Rab27A KD has reduced capacity to induce migration compared to sControl-hCPCs EV isolate (EV isolates of equal cell numbers). e, f Both sControl-hCPCs (e) and Rab27 KD-hCPCs (f) are observed in the heart after 48 h (blue: DAPI, green: human Lamin A/C, red: PECAM-1, yellow: cardiac troponin I (cTNI)). g Representative pictures of TTC analysis after injection of PBS, sControl-hCPCs, and Rab27A KD-hCPCs. h Quantification of the infarcted area in hearts injected with PBS, sControl-hCPCs, and Rab27A-KD hCPCs (PBS, n = 9; control-hCPC, n = 4; Rab27A KD-hCPC, n = 5)

To determine if the EV secretion is responsible for the cardioprotective effect of hCPCs after myocardial infarction, we injected either sControl-hCPCs or Rab27A KD-hCPCs into the infarct border zone after induction of MI. Immunohistological analysis after 48 h showed the presence of both sControl-hCPCs (Fig. 1e) and Rab27A KD-hCPCs (Fig. 1f) in the heart. To determine the effect on infarct size, we performed a TTC staining and observed that sControl-hCPCs significantly reduced the infarct size when compared to PBS injections (Fig. 1g, h). This effect was not present upon injection of Rab27A KD-hCPCs, suggesting that the vesicles secreted by hCPCs are a major contributor to the reduction of infarct size by hCPCs.

hCPC-Derived EVs Reduce Infarct Size

Since Rab27A KD-hCPCs did not reduce infarct size, suggesting a role for the extracellular vesicles, we next sought to directly analyze the effect of hCPC-derived EVs upon injection into the infarcted myocardium. Prior to injecting the EVs, we confirmed the presence of a population of EVs of ± 120 nm in size with a density of approximately 1.12 g/mL (data not shown). Furthermore, functional activity of EVs was evaluated by performing a scratch assay, which revealed that these EVs stimulated the migration of HMEC-1, as we previously reported [6] (Fig. 2a). EVs were subsequently injected into the border zone of the infarction, 15 min after permanent ligation of the LAD, and the infarct size was analyzed after 48 h (Fig. 2b). As shown by TTC analysis (Fig. 2c), PBS-injected hearts displayed a mean infarct size of 42.9% ± 4.4, while the infarct size in hearts injected with EVs was 26.75% ± 2.2 (Fig. 2d), indicating that hCPC-EVs reduce the extent of damage shortly after MI.

Fig. 2
figure2

hCPC-derived EVs reduce infarct size. a EVs stimulate wound closure in a HMEC-1 scratch assay. Percentage of closure of the wounded area was determined after 24 h. b Timeline of in vivo procedures. c Representative images of TTC stained hearts injected with PBS or exosomes, 48 h after MI. White area represents the infarcted region. d Quantification of the infarcted area as a percentage of the total area of the left ventricle (n = 9)

EV Uptake by Cardiovascular Cells Post-MI in the Myocardium

To understand how EVs could exert their effect shortly after MI, we determined which of the cardiovascular cells present within the injured myocardium internalize EVs. Therefore, we injected EVs labeled with PKH67 or PKH26 into mouse hearts that underwent MI and analyzed the distribution of the fluorescently labeled EVs in combination with cell type–specific immunofluorescent analysis (Fig. 3a). After EV labeling, sucrose gradient separation was used to prevent free label injections into the myocardium. As can be appreciated, EV fluorescence was spread from the site of injection towards the apex, showing a large area of EV uptake from levels 3 to 8 (Fig. 3b). The total area of EV dye uptake extended to over 2700 μm. Most EVs were taken up by cells in the border zone, close to the anticipated sites of injection (levels 5 and 6). To determine which cell types contained EVs, we analyzed high-magnification images (Fig. 3c). The dominant target cells for hCPC-derived EVs were endothelial cells and cardiomyocytes, although some interstitial cells also seemed to be positive for EV uptake (Fig. 3d, single channel pictures in Supplemental Fig. 2). Thus, EVs are effectively taken up by cardiomyocytes and endothelial cells after injection into the ischemic left ventricle.

Fig. 3
figure3

EV distribution in the heart. a Schematic representation of the analysis of infarcted heart. Blue arrows indicate the EV injection site. b Analysis of the entire heart showed the uptake of PKH67 from the loaded EVs in the heart from level 3 to 7/8. White arrows point at positive cells. c Higher magnification of insert in B, showing uptake of EVs in the infarct zone. d Higher magnification of insert in C, which shows uptake of EVs by cardiomyocytes (arrows) and endothelial cells (arrowheads)

EVs Increased the Number of Ki67- and YAP-Expressing Cells in the Left Ventricle

Since EV injection reduced infarct size, we analyzed the EV-positive area in more detail. We first assessed proliferation of cells within the infarcted area by determining the number of Ki67-positive cells. Interestingly, we found Ki67 expression not only within the PKH-positive cells but also more present in cells in the vicinity of the EV signal (Fig. 4a). Quantification of these cells, by counting the number of positive nuclei in relation to the infarct area, showed a significant increase in the number of Ki67-positive nuclei in the hearts receiving hCPC-derived EVs compared to PBS-injected heart (Fig. 4b). Number of positive cells was corrected for infarct size in order to correct for differences in cardiac size. Next, we analyzed which of the cell types found in the border zone of the infarct were Ki67 positive. As shown in Fig. 4c, we found Ki67-positive nuclei in cardiomyocytes, endothelial cells, and other/interstitial cells, which is in agreement with the cell types we identified before. Since the largest increase in proliferation was seen in layers 5 and 6 (Supplemental Fig. 3), we quantified the specific number of different cell types in the border zone of the infarct in these levels. As can be seen in Fig. 4d, hCPC-EV injection resulted in a significant increase in Ki67-positive cardiomyocytes compared to PBS control (mean ± st.dev, 226.5 ± 74.31 vs 94.17 ± 43.20, p < 0.05). A similar effect was seen for endothelial cells, where EV injection increased the number of Ki67-positive cells from 36.17 ± 17.88 to 177.0 ± 110.9 (p < 0.05) (Fig. 4e). The difference in Ki67-positive cells in other cell types did not reach statistical significance (PBS, 215.2 ± 56.53 vs EV, 411.7 ± 228.4) (Fig. 4f).

Fig. 4
figure4

hCPC-derived EVs induce Ki67 expression in the left ventricle after MI. a Ki67 (red) in the heart in the presence of EVs (green). Nuclei are stained with DAPI (blue). b Quantification of Ki67-positive cells in the infarct and border zone, relative to the area of the infarct, shows that EVs increase the number of Ki67-positive cells (n = 3). c Ki67 staining in the heart after EV injection shows proliferation in various cell types (arrows: positive cardiomyocytes; arrowheads: positive endothelial cells; circled arrowheads: other cells). Smaller pictures show examples of individual cell types. Cardiomyocytes were identified through autofluorescence. df Graphs depicting the number of proliferating cardiomyocytes (d), endothelial cells (e), and other cells (f) in the heart, in layers 5 and 6, after EV and PBS injection. A significant increase was found in cardiomyocyte proliferation (n = 3)

In order to investigate how EVs can increase Ki67 after MI, we looked into the association with activation of YAP. In tumor and progenitor cells, it is shown that Ki67 correlates to YAP expression and furthermore, a decrease in YAP causes a decrease in Ki67 levels and a decrease in proliferation [30,31,32]. Therefore, we explored whether EV treatment affects YAP levels. Interestingly, we observed an increase in nuclear YAP in the border zone in the vicinity of the EV signal (Fig. 5a, single channels Supplemental Fig. 4), and a significant increase of total YAP in the infarcted area (Fig. 5b). In summary, injection of hCPC-EVs increases Ki67 and YAP signaling in the heart, of which the former is predominantly increased in cardiomyocytes and endothelial cells.

Fig. 5
figure5

YAP expression after MI. a Representative pictures of YAP expression in the border zone of PBS and EV injected hearts. b Quantitative analysis shows that the number of YAP-positive cells is higher in the infarct zone of hearts injected with hCPC-EVs compared to PBS-injected hearts. Numbers of positive cells are normalized for infarct size and shown as number of cells per percentage infarct

Endoglin Level in the Heart Is Influenced by EVs

Since we observed an increase in endothelial cell proliferation, we next questioned whether hCPC-EV treatment affected endothelial activation. We have previously shown that EVs from hCPCs are a very potent stimulant of angiogenesis [7]. Since changes in vascular density are not yet measurable at this short-time point post-MI, we turned to endoglin as a well-known factor in inducing angiogenesis and a marker of active endothelial cells [33] and determined whether endoglin expression was changed after hCPC-EV injection. As shown in Fig. 6a, endoglin is clearly present in hCPC-EVs, confirming their pro-angiogenic profile. Next, we analyzed if endoglin expression was increased in the injured myocardium after hCPC-EV injection. We observed an increase in endoglin expression in the infarct border zone in the area of EV uptake, when compared to control (Fig. 6b, c). Higher magnification showed mainly endothelial cells and small vessels with a strong endoglin signal. Endoglin staining also partially colocalized with EV uptake, suggesting delivery of endoglin by EVs (Fig. 6d). Although the difference in total endoglin levels did not reach significance, it does suggest that EVs, through delivery of endoglin itself and other pro-angiogenic stimuli, cause an increase in endoglin levels.

Fig. 6
figure6

Endoglin levels in the heart. a Endoglin is present in EVs from hCPCs, two individual isolations are shown. b After injection of PKH-labeled EVs, areas positive for EV uptake are also highly positive for endoglin, compared to PBS injection. c Quantification of endoglin levels in the entire heart after PBS or EV injection. d Endoglin signal is mainly found in endothelial cells and cells positive for EV uptake

Discussion

Cell transplantation has been extensively studied over the last decade as a regenerative therapy for the heart. The transplantation of hCPCs has been shown to increase cardiac function, induce neovascularization and, in some cases, provide new cardiomyocytes [3, 4, 34]. However, in the last few years, it has become clear that this beneficial effect on heart performance is mainly due to the paracrine factors secreted by these cells [35]. In this study, we show that EVs from hCPCs can decrease infarct size by inducing proliferative markers and by altering the angiogenic state of the tissue, as shown by the presence of endoglin positive–activated blood vessels.

Several studies have shown that injection of hCPCs exerts beneficial effects after MI and that hCPCs are able to differentiate to cardiomyocytes and endothelial cells in the mouse heart [3, 4, 34]. Even as soon as 2 days post-MI, when hCPC differentiation is still absent, a positive effect is already seen, suggesting the effect of paracrine factors [5]. Therefore, we set out to discern between the effect of hCPCs and their secreted EVs on short-term cardiac regeneration and infarct size. Knockdown of Rab27A in hCPCs, previously shown to affect EV secretion in tumor cells [29], also reduced the number of EVs secreted from hCPCs. The observed increase in Rab27B was not sufficient to rescue the EV secretion, showing that Rab27A is crucial in the secretion pathway in hCPCs. This dependence on Rab27A has also been seen in other cells [36]. The in vitro effect on endothelial cell migration was reduced when stimulated with the EV isolate from Rab27A knockdown cells, confirming a loss of paracrine effects. Injection of the cells into the murine heart after MI showed that normal hCPCs can decrease the infarct size after 2 days, which confirms the effect on cardiac function seen before [4]. In contrast, we could not find a decrease in infarct size with RAB27A KD-hCPCs, showing that on the short term, the paracrine factors are a major contributor to the cardioprotective effect.

It has been shown that paracrine factors from, e.g., mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) and cardiac progenitor cells have beneficial effects after MI. Injection of the conditioned medium from MSCs has confirmed this hypothesis by showing a decrease in infarct size and increase in cardiac function [37, 38]. Since hCPCs are part of the cardiac cell lineage, their paracrine factors could be more tailored towards cardiac regeneration. For example, conditioned medium of hCPCs has been shown to induce angiogenesis and migration of hCPCs [39]. Following this, multiple studies have shown that injection of EVs—of several cell sources—is capable of reducing cardiac infarction in mice and rats more than 1 week after MI induction [40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49]. The first large animal experiment using cardiosphere-derived EVs revealed a reduction in infarct size in an acute MI setting; however, it failed to show an improvement in cardiac function in a chronic model [50]. A short-term effect on infarct size, within 48 h, has only been illustrated with EVs from human MSCs [51]. Arslan and colleagues observed that the decrease in infarct size coincided with an increase in pAkt and pGSKβ signaling, known mediators in survival pathways of the cells. Here, we demonstrate that EVs from hCPCs are also capable of reducing the infarct size after 48 h. This is in corroboration with the results on cardiac functions after injection of hCPCs and supports the theory that paracrine factors are a major effector of cell therapy [4, 5].

Proliferation of cardiac cells after MI can prevent the extent of the damage and result in a preservation and regeneration of contractile force. So far, proliferation has only been seen after treatment with ES-derived EVs and hypoxic MSC EVs [45, 52]. Khan et al. have shown an increase in proliferation of resident c-kit positive cells, via phospho-histone 3 staining [45], upon EV injection. Zhu et al. showed that MSC EV-treated hearts had an increase in overall proliferation by Ki67 staining, but could not find a significant increase in cardiomyocyte proliferation [52]. We show here that injection of EVs from hCPCs leads to stimulation of expression of proliferative markers in the heart after MI and that this effect is already present after 48 h. After EV injection, an overall increase in proliferation could be observed in the infarcted and border zone area of the hearts. In particular around the area of EV uptake, the increase in proliferation, shown by Ki67 staining, was striking. Moreover, detailed analysis showed a specific increase in cardiomyocyte and endothelial cell proliferation, suggesting that these cell types are mainly being affected by the injected EVs. Interestingly, Ki67 was shown to correlate with YAP levels and a decrease in YAP expression levels caused a reduction in Ki67 [30,31,32]. In corroboration with the increase in Ki67 we observe in our EV-injected hearts, we also observed an increase in YAP in the vicinity of EV uptake. This is in line with reports showing that YAP is involved in cell growth [21, 53] and that EVs are able to activate YAP signaling [54, 55]. Interestingly, Yap is part of the Hippo pathway and deficiencies in Hippo signaling have shown to be beneficial in heart failure [19]. Moreover, analysis of miRNAs involved in cardiomyocyte proliferation showed that the majority inhibit the Hippo pathway and lead to nuclear YAP localization [56]. The increase in YAP we see therefore implies a link to proliferation and cardiac regeneration. However, to establish a direct correlation between cardiomyocyte proliferation and hCPC-EVs with regard to YAP signaling, in-depth in vitro experiments will be required. Since the Hippo-YAP pathway is also related to angiogenesis [57], and we observe an increase in Ki67-expressing endothelial cells, the increase in YAP after EV treatment could also affect endothelial function and neo-vascularization. Altogether, our results indicate that hCPC-EVs are capable of increasing proliferative markers in the cardiac tissue.

Since we have observed the increase in Ki67 also in endothelial cells, we raised the question whether angiogenesis was also affected by the hCPC-EVs here, since we have shown previously that hCPC-EVs are very potent inducers of angiogenesis [6, 7]. This increase in angiogenesis was seen in vitro as well as in vivo and shown to be dependent on EMMPRIN. Therefore, since we analyzed the effects after 48 h, we investigated the activation of endothelial cells after hCPC-EV injection through endoglin. Endoglin, a co-receptor for the TGF-β/ALK1 signaling pathway, is a known pro-angiogenic factor and is present on activated endothelial cells [33, 58]. We found that endoglin is present on the hCPC-EVs and that the endoglin signal was increased in and around the area of hCPC-EV uptake after hCPC-EV injection. This signal was mainly seen in endothelial cells and small vessels, suggesting primarily endothelial activation of the smaller capillaries. Although the quantification did not reach statistical significance, probably due to the already activated post-MI responses, the observation of the increased endoglin signal indicates more local and small vessel activation. This suggests that hCPC-EVs can activate endoglin in the cardiac cells and could thereby increase the activation of endothelial cells.

The intricacy of their content, consisting of several (mi)RNAs and proteins, and the effectiveness of EVs make them interesting potential therapies. Their ability to convey several signals and to be taken up by virtually any cell is an indispensable quality for an effective regenerative therapy, and makes them very suitable as an off-the-shelf treatment. We show that hCPC-secreted EVs likely contribute to the reduced cardiac deterioration observed in pre-clinical cell transplantation studies. They increase proliferation in the left ventricle and promote cardiomyocyte proliferative markers in the border zone. Furthermore, they can influence angiogenesis by stimulation of pro-angiogenic factors such as endoglin. Further research into the mechanisms by which the EVs exert this effect would provide better insight into the therapeutic range of the EVs. Altogether, hCPC-EVs exert cardioprotective effects shortly after MI, making them promising novel therapeutic agents.

Abbreviations

EGF:

Epidermal growth factor

EMMPRIN:

Extracellular matrix metalloproteinase inducer

EV:

Extracellular vesicles

hCPCs:

Human cardiac progenitor cells

MSC:

Mesenchymal stromal cells

MI:

Myocardial infarction

OCT:

Optimal cutting temperature compound

PBS:

Phosphate-buffered saline

Rab27A knock down:

Rab27A KD

sControl:

Scrambled control

YAP:

Yes-associated protein

References

  1. 1.

    (2018). WHO | Global Health Observatory (GHO) data. WHO.

  2. 2.

    Goumans, M.-J., de Boer, T. P., Smits, A. M., et al. (2007). TGF-beta1 induces efficient differentiation of human cardiomyocyte progenitor cells into functional cardiomyocytes in vitro. Stem Cell Research, 1, 138–149.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Smith, R. R., Barile, L., Cho, H. C., et al. (2007). Regenerative potential of cardiosphere-derived cells expanded. Circulation, 115, 896–908.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Smits, A. M., van Laake, L. W., den Ouden, K., et al. (2009). Human cardiomyocyte progenitor cell transplantation preserves long-term function of the infarcted mouse myocardium. Cardiovascular Research, 83, 527–535.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    den Haan, M. C., Grauss, R. W., Smits, A. M., et al. (2012). Cardiomyogenic differentiation-independent improvement of cardiac function by human cardiomyocyte progenitor cell injection in ischaemic mouse hearts. Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, 16, 1508–1521.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Vrijsen, K. R., Sluijter, J. P. G., Schuchardt, M. W. L., et al. (2010). Cardiomyocyte progenitor cell-derived exosomes stimulate migration of endothelial cells. Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, 14, 1064–1070.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Vrijsen, K. R., Maring, J. A., Chamuleau, S. A. J., et al. (2016). Exosomes from cardiomyocyte progenitor cells and mesenchymal stem cells stimulate angiogenesis via EMMPRIN. Advanced Healthcare Materials, 5, 2555–2565.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Thery C, Clayton A, Amigorena S, et al (2001) Isolation and characterization of exosomes from cell culture supernatants and biological fluids. In: Current Protocols in Cell Biology. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., pp. 1–29.

  9. 9.

    Valadi, H., Ekstrom, K., Bossios, A., et al. (2007). Exosome-mediated transfer of mRNAs and microRNAs is a novel mechanism of genetic exchange between cells. Nature Cell Biology, 9, 654–659.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Sluijter, J. P. G., Davidson, S. M., Boulanger, C. M., et al. (2018). Extracellular vesicles in diagnostics and therapy of the ischaemic heart: Position paper from the working group on Cellular Biology of the Heart of the European Society of Cardiology. Cardiovascular Research, 114, 19–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Qu, J.-L., Qu, X.-J., Zhao, M.-F., et al. (2009). Gastric cancer exosomes promote tumour cell proliferation through PI3K/Akt and MAPK/ERK activation. Digestive and Liver Disease, 41, 875–880.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Wolfers, J., Lozier, A., Raposo, G., et al. (2001). Tumor-derived exosomes are a source of shared tumor rejection antigens for CTL cross-priming. Nature Medicine, 7, 297–303.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Zomer, A., Maynard, C., Verweij, F. J., et al. (2015). In vivo imaging reveals extracellular vesicle-mediated phenocopying of metastatic behavior. Cell, 161, 1046–1057.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Porrello, E. R., Mahmoud, A. I., Simpson, E., et al. (2011). Transient regenerative potential of the neonatal mouse heart. Science, 331, 1078–1080.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    De Falco, M., Cobellis, G., & De Luca, A. (2009). Proliferation of cardiomyocytes: A question unresolved. Frontiers in Bioscience (Elite Edition), 1, 528–536.

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Bergmann, O., Bhardwaj, R. D., Bernard, S., et al. (2009). Evidence for cardiomyocyte renewal in humans. Science, 324, 98–102.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Bergmann, O., Zdunek, S., Felker, A., et al. (2015). Dynamics of cell generation and turnover in the human heart. Cell, 161, 1566–1575.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Mahmoud, A. I., Kocabas, F., Muralidhar, S. A., et al. (2013). Meis1 regulates postnatal cardiomyocyte cell cycle arrest. Nature, 497, 249–253.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Heallen, T., Morikawa, Y., Leach, J., et al. (2013). Hippo signaling impedes adult heart regeneration. Development, 140, 4683–4690.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Xin, M., Kim, Y., Sutherland, L. B., et al. (2013). Hippo pathway effector Yap promotes cardiac regeneration. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110, 13839–13844.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Leach, J. P., Heallen, T., Zhang, M., et al. (2017). Hippo pathway deficiency reverses systolic heart failure after infarction. Nature, 550, 260–264.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Morikawa, Y., Heallen, T., Leach, J., et al. (2017). Dystrophin-glycoprotein complex sequesters Yap to inhibit cardiomyocyte proliferation. Nature, 547, 227–231.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Smits, A. M., van Vliet, P., Metz, C. H., et al. (2009). Human cardiomyocyte progenitor cells differentiate into functional mature cardiomyocytes: An in vitro model for studying human cardiac physiology and pathophysiology. Nature Protocols, 4, 232–243.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Smits, A. M., van Oorschot, A. A., & Goumans, M. J. (2012). Isolation and differentiation of human cardiomyocyte progenitor cells into cardiomyocytes. Methods in Molecular Biology, 879, 339–349.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Van Mil, A., Grundmann, S., Goumans, M. J., et al. (2012). MicroRNA-214 inhibits angiogenesis by targeting Quaking and reducing angiogenic growth factor release. Cardiovascular Research, 93, 655–665.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Tersteeg, C., Roest, M., Mak-Nienhuis, E. M., et al. (2012). A fibronectin-fibrinogen-tropoelastin coating reduces smooth muscle cell growth but improves endothelial cell function. Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, 16, 2117–2126.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Lötvall, J., Hill, A. F., Hochberg, F., et al. (2014). Minimal experimental requirements for definition of extracellular vesicles and their functions: A position statement from the International Society for Extracellular Vesicles. Journal of Extracellular Vesicles, 3, 26913.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    van Laake, L. W., Passier, R., Monshouwer-Kloots, J., et al. (2007). Monitoring of cell therapy and assessment of cardiac function using magnetic resonance imaging in a mouse model of myocardial infarction. Nature Protocols, 2, 2551–2567.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Ostrowski, M., Carmo, N. B., Krumeich, S., et al. (2010). Rab27a and Rab27b control different steps of the exosome secretion pathway. Nature Cell Biology, 12, 19-30–19-13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Boin, A., Couvelard, A., Couderc, C., et al. (2014). Proteomic screening identifies a YAP-driven signaling network linked to tumor cell proliferation in human schwannomas. Neuro-Oncology, 16, 1196–1209.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Yuan, Y., Zhong, W., Ma, G., et al. (2015). Yes-associated protein regulates the growth of human non-small cell lung cancer in response to matrix stiffness. Molecular Medicine Reports, 11, 4267–4272.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Zhang, Z.-W., Men, T., Feng, R.-C., et al. (2013). miR-375 inhibits proliferation of mouse pancreatic progenitor cells by targeting YAP1. Cellular Physiology and Biochemistry, 32, 1808–1817.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Lebrin, F., Goumans, M.-J., Jonker, L., et al. (2004). Endoglin promotes endothelial cell proliferation and TGF-beta/ALK1 signal transduction. The EMBO Journal, 23, 4018–4028.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Beltrami, A. P., Barlucchi, L., Torella, D., et al. (2003). Adult cardiac stem cells are multipotent and support myocardial regeneration. Cell, 114, 763–776.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Maxeiner, H., Krehbiehl, N., Müller, A., et al. (2010). New insights into paracrine mechanisms of human cardiac progenitor cells. European Journal of Heart Failure, 12, 730–737.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Bobrie, A., Krumeich, S., Reyal, F., et al. (2012). Rab27a supports exosome-dependent and -independent mechanisms that modify the tumor microenvironment and can promote tumor progression. Cancer Research, 72, 4920–4930.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Timmers, L., Lim, S. K., Arslan, F., et al. (2007). Reduction of myocardial infarct size by human mesenchymal stem cell conditioned medium. Stem Cell Research, 1, 129–137.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Timmers, L., Lim, S. K., Hoefer, I. E., et al. (2011). Human mesenchymal stem cell-conditioned medium improves cardiac function following myocardial infarction. Stem Cell Research, 6, 206–214.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    van Oorschot, A. A. M., Smits, A. M., Pardali, E., et al. (2011). Low oxygen tension positively influences cardiomyocyte progenitor cell function. Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, 15, 2723–2734.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Waters, R., Alam, P., Pacelli, S., et al. (2018). Stem cell-inspired secretome-rich injectable hydrogel to repair injured cardiac tissue. Acta Biomaterialia, 69, 95–106.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Yang, J., Li, Y., Xue, F., et al. (2017). Exosomes derived from cardiac telocytes exert positive effects on endothelial cells. American Journal of Translational Research, 9, 5375–5387.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Sharma, S., Mishra, R., Bigham, G. E., et al. (2017). A deep proteome analysis identifies the complete secretome as the functional unit of human cardiac progenitor cells. Circulation Research, 120, 816–834.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Barile, L., Lionetti, V., Cervio, E., et al. (2014). Extracellular vesicles from human cardiac progenitor cells inhibit cardiomyocyte apoptosis and improve cardiac function after myocardial infarction. Cardiovascular Research, 103, 530–541.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Ibrahim, A. G.-E., Cheng, K., & Marbán, E. (2014). Exosomes as critical agents of cardiac regeneration triggered by cell therapy. Stem Cell Reports, 2, 606–619.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Khan, M., Nickoloff, E., Abramova, T., et al. (2015). Embryonic stem cell-derived exosomes promote endogenous repair mechanisms and enhance cardiac function following myocardial infarction. Circulation Research, 117, 52–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Liu, H., Gao, W., Yuan, J., et al. (2015). Exosomes derived from dendritic cells improve cardiac function via activation of CD4(+) T lymphocytes after myocardial infarction. Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology, 91, 123–133.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Shao, L., Zhang, Y., Lan, B., et al. (2017). MiRNA-sequence indicates that mesenchymal stem cells and exosomes have similar mechanism to enhance cardiac repair. BioMed Research International, 2017, 4150705.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Vicencio, J. M., Yellon, D. M., Sivaraman, V., et al. (2015). Plasma exosomes protect the myocardium from ischemia-reperfusion injury. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 65, 1525–1536.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Yu, B., Kim, H. W., Gong, M., et al. (2014). Exosomes secreted from GATA-4 overexpressing mesenchymal stem cells serve as a reservoir of anti-apoptotic microRNAs for cardioprotection. International Journal of Cardiology, 182C, 349–360.

    Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Gallet, R., Dawkins, J., Valle, J., et al. (2017). Exosomes secreted by cardiosphere-derived cells reduce scarring, attenuate adverse remodelling, and improve function in acute and chronic porcine myocardial infarction. European Heart Journal, 38, 201–211.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Arslan, F., Lai, R. C., Smeets, M. B., et al. (2013). Mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes increase ATP levels, decrease oxidative stress and activate PI3K/Akt pathway to enhance myocardial viability and prevent adverse remodeling after myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury. Stem Cell Research, 10, 301–312.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Zhu J, Lu K, Zhang N, et al (2017) Myocardial reparative functions of exosomes from mesenchymal stem cells are enhanced by hypoxia treatment of the cells via transferring microRNA-210 in an nSMase2-dependent way. Artif Cells, Nanomedicine, Biotechnology, 1–12.

  53. 53.

    Watt, K. I., Harvey, K. F., & Gregorevic, P. (2017). Regulation of tissue growth by the mammalian hippo signaling pathway. Frontiers in Physiology, 8, 942.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Guo, S.-C., Tao, S.-C., Yin, W.-J., et al. (2017). Exosomes derived from platelet-rich plasma promote the re-epithelization of chronic cutaneous wounds via activation of YAP in a diabetic rat model. Theranostics, 7, 81–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Tao, S.-C., Yuan, T., Zhang, Y.-L., et al. (2017). Exosomes derived from miR-140-5p-overexpressing human synovial mesenchymal stem cells enhance cartilage tissue regeneration and prevent osteoarthritis of the knee in a rat model. Theranostics, 7, 180–195.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Diez-Cuñado, M., Wei, K., Bushway, P. J., et al. (2018). miRNAs that induce human cardiomyocyte proliferation converge on the hippo pathway. Cell Reports, 23, 2168–2174.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Park, J. A., & Kwon, Y.-G. (2018). Hippo-YAP/TAZ signaling in angiogenesis. BMB Reports, 51, 157–162.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Liu, Z., Lebrin, F., Maring, J. A., et al. (2014). ENDOGLIN is dispensable for vasculogenesis, but required for vascular endothelial growth factor-induced angiogenesis. PLoS One, 9, e86273.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research is funded by ZonMW - Translational Adult Stem cell research (TAS grant 116002016) and is part of the Project P1.04 SMARTCARE of the BioMedical Materials institute, co-funded by the Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs, Agriculture and Innovation. JS is supported by Horizon2020 ERC-2016-COG EVICARE (725229).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

JM, VV, AS, MG, and JS conceived and designed the experiments. JM and KL executed the experiments. EM, CD, AM, CW, VV, JD, and PV aided in the experiments and/or the interpretation of the data. JM analyzed and interpreted the data. The article was written by JM with AS, MG, and JS.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marie-José Goumans.

Ethics declarations

All institutional and national guidelines for the care and use of laboratory animals were followed and approved by the appropriate institutional committees.

No human studies were carried out by the authors for this article.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Associate Editor Junjie Xiao oversaw the review of this article

Electronic Supplementary Material

ESM 1

(DOCX 702 kb)

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Maring, J.A., Lodder, K., Mol, E. et al. Cardiac Progenitor Cell–Derived Extracellular Vesicles Reduce Infarct Size and Associate with Increased Cardiovascular Cell Proliferation. J. of Cardiovasc. Trans. Res. 12, 5–17 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12265-018-9842-9

Download citation

Keywords

  • Extracellular vesicles
  • Cardiac progenitor cells
  • Myocardial infarction
  • Proliferation
  • Cardiomyocytes
  • Angiogenesis
  • Endoglin