Skip to main content

The Mechanism for Allocating Limited Working Memory Resources in Multitasking

Neuroscience Bulletin volume 38, pages 829–833 (2022)Cite this article

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Wheeler ME, Treisman AM. Binding in short-term visual memory. J Exp Psychol Gen 2002, 131: 48–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Luria R, Vogel EK. Shape and color conjunction stimuli are represented as bound objects in visual working memory. Neuropsychologia 2011, 49: 1632–1639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ku YX, Yuan TF. “transient” or “persistent” coding for working memory. Neurosci Bull 2020, 36: 1233–1235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Luck SJ, Vogel EK. The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions. Nature 1997, 390: 279–281.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Vogel EK, Woodman GF, Luck SJ. Storage of features, conjunctions, and objects in visual working memory. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 2001, 27: 92–114.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Alvarez GA, Cavanagh P. The capacity of visual short-term memory is set both by visual information load and by number of objects. Psychol Sci 2004, 15: 106–111.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Awh E, Barton B, Vogel EK. Visual working memory represents a fixed number of items regardless of complexity. Psychol Sci 2007, 18: 622–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bays PM, Husain M. Dynamic shifts of limited working memory resources in human vision. Science 2008, 321: 851–854.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Markov YA, Utochkin IS, Brady TF. Real-world objects are not stored in holistic representations in visual working memory. J Vis 2021, 21: 18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Anderson DE, Vogel EK, Awh E. Precision in visual working memory reaches a stable plateau when individual item limits are exceeded. J Neurosci 2011, 31: 1128–1138.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Baddeley A. Working memory: Theories, models, and controversies. Annu Rev Psychol 2012, 63: 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wood JN. When do spatial and visual working memory interact? Atten Percept Psychophys 2011, 73: 420–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Roland PE. Cortical organization of voluntary behavior in man. Hum Neurobiol 1985, 4: 155–167.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Klingberg T. Concurrent performance of two working memory tasks: Potential mechanisms of interference. Cereb Cortex 1998, 8: 593–601.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Klingberg T, Roland PE. Interference between two concurrent tasks is associated with activation of overlapping fields in the cortex. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 1997, 6: 1–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Just MA, Carpenter PA, Keller TA, Emery L, Zajac H, Thulborn KR. Interdependence of nonoverlapping cortical systems in dual cognitive tasks. NeuroImage 2001, 14: 417–426.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Watanabe K, Funahashi S. Neural mechanisms of dual-task interference and cognitive capacity limitation in the prefrontal cortex. Nat Neurosci 2014, 17: 601–611.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Dai J, Brooks DI, Sheinberg DL. Optogenetic and electrical microstimulation systematically bias visuospatial choice in primates. Curr Biol 2014, 24: 63–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Funahashi S, Bruce CJ, Goldman-Rakic PS. Visuospatial coding in primate prefrontal neurons revealed by oculomotor paradigms. J Neurophysiol 1990, 63: 814–831.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Rigotti M, Barak O, Warden MR, Wang XJ, Daw ND, Miller EK. The importance of mixed selectivity in complex cognitive tasks. Nature 2013, 497: 585–590.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Xu YJ, Liu X, Cao X, Huang CP, Liu EK, Qian S, et al. Artificial intelligence: A powerful paradigm for scientific research. Innovation (N Y) 2021, 2: 100179.

Download references

Acknowledgements

This insight was supported by the Shenzhen Oversea Innovation Team Project (KQTD20180413181834876), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (U20A2017), the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Science (XDBS01030100), and the Shenzhen-Hong Kong Institute of Brain Science–Shenzhen Fundamental Research Institutions (NYKFKT2019009), China.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Research Center for Medical Artificial Intelligence, Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, 518055, China

    Lu Gan, Jinglong Wu & Shintaro Funahashi

  2. CAS Key Laboratory of Brain Connectome and Manipulation, the Brain Cognition and Brain Disease Institute, Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, 518055, China

    Ji Dai

  3. Shenzhen-Hong Kong Institute of Brain Science-Shenzhen Fundamental Research Institutions, Shenzhen, 518055, China

    Ji Dai

  4. University of The Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China

    Ji Dai

Authors
  1. Lu Gan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jinglong Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ji Dai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Shintaro Funahashi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Ji Dai or Shintaro Funahashi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gan, L., Wu, J., Dai, J. et al. The Mechanism for Allocating Limited Working Memory Resources in Multitasking. Neurosci. Bull. 38, 829–833 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12264-022-00853-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12264-022-00853-6